Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Nursing Students' Perceptions Following a Guided Learning Activity.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Educator Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1097/nne.0000000000001736
Heather Hawk,Michael Coriasco,Jeffrey R Jones
{"title":"Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis of Nursing Students' Perceptions Following a Guided Learning Activity.","authors":"Heather Hawk,Michael Coriasco,Jeffrey R Jones","doi":"10.1097/nne.0000000000001736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nUnderstanding the functionality, benefits, and limitations of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is important for nurses and nursing students.\r\n\r\nPURPOSE\r\nThis study explored nursing students' perspectives on GAI after a guided learning activity in which students used a chatbot to answer a clinical question.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA qualitative approach using reflective thematic analysis of written reflections was conducted with 19 nursing students in a nursing baccalaureate completion program.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nStudent reflections demonstrated 4 themes: surprisingly familiar; the importance of critical thinking and external validation; a good summary lacking depth and nuance; and cautious optimism. Two subthemes were also identified: validation is time-consuming and a new perspective.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nLearning activities using GAI influence students' knowledge and attitudes and instill critical awareness of the advantages and limitations of this technology. Additional emphasis on bias in GAI is needed when teaching about AI.","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000001736","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Understanding the functionality, benefits, and limitations of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is important for nurses and nursing students. PURPOSE This study explored nursing students' perspectives on GAI after a guided learning activity in which students used a chatbot to answer a clinical question. METHODS A qualitative approach using reflective thematic analysis of written reflections was conducted with 19 nursing students in a nursing baccalaureate completion program. RESULTS Student reflections demonstrated 4 themes: surprisingly familiar; the importance of critical thinking and external validation; a good summary lacking depth and nuance; and cautious optimism. Two subthemes were also identified: validation is time-consuming and a new perspective. CONCLUSIONS Learning activities using GAI influence students' knowledge and attitudes and instill critical awareness of the advantages and limitations of this technology. Additional emphasis on bias in GAI is needed when teaching about AI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生成式人工智能:对护理专业学生在指导学习活动后的看法进行反思性专题分析。
背景了解生成式人工智能(GAI)的功能、益处和局限性对护士和护理专业学生非常重要。目的本研究探讨了护理专业学生在使用聊天机器人回答临床问题的指导性学习活动后对 GAI 的看法。结果学生的反思显示了 4 个主题:令人惊讶的熟悉感;批判性思维和外部验证的重要性;缺乏深度和细微差别的良好总结;谨慎乐观。结论使用 GAI 的学习活动会影响学生的知识和态度,并灌输对该技术优势和局限性的批判意识。在教授人工智能时,需要进一步强调 GAI 中的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Educator
Nurse Educator 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.
期刊最新文献
Aligning the Clinical Judgment Management Model With Clinical Concept Mapping. Redesigning Communities of Interest Meetings for Accreditation. Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Academic Evidence-Based Practice Workshop With Faculty Certification. Building Competence in Interprofessional Partnerships in a DNP Program. Developing Nursing Competencies With Health Occupations Students of America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1