Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support in ostomy patients and their caregivers.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1177/13591053241278169
Paolo Iovino,Ilaria Marcomini,Laura Rasero,Duilio Fiorenzo Manara,Ercole Vellone,Giulia Villa
{"title":"Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support in ostomy patients and their caregivers.","authors":"Paolo Iovino,Ilaria Marcomini,Laura Rasero,Duilio Fiorenzo Manara,Ercole Vellone,Giulia Villa","doi":"10.1177/13591053241278169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the importance of social support in ostomy care, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) does not appear to be validated in the context of ostomy care. This study evaluated the psychometric characteristics of MSPSS in ostomy patients and their informal caregivers. The MSPSS was tested in a sample of 775 participants with confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency reliability was assessed with the ordinal Omega coefficient. Criterion-related validity was ascertained via hypothesis testing by correlating the scores of the MSPSS with other measures. MSPSS for patients and caregivers has a three-factor structure with a good fit. Internal consistency reliability of the factors was excellent. Concurrent validity was supported by the negative correlations between MSPSS scores with depression and stoma-related QoL, and the positive correlations with perceived mutuality. Our research indicates that the MSPSS is a sound measure of social support for ostomy patients and their caregivers.","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241278169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the importance of social support in ostomy care, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) does not appear to be validated in the context of ostomy care. This study evaluated the psychometric characteristics of MSPSS in ostomy patients and their informal caregivers. The MSPSS was tested in a sample of 775 participants with confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency reliability was assessed with the ordinal Omega coefficient. Criterion-related validity was ascertained via hypothesis testing by correlating the scores of the MSPSS with other measures. MSPSS for patients and caregivers has a three-factor structure with a good fit. Internal consistency reliability of the factors was excellent. Concurrent validity was supported by the negative correlations between MSPSS scores with depression and stoma-related QoL, and the positive correlations with perceived mutuality. Our research indicates that the MSPSS is a sound measure of social support for ostomy patients and their caregivers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
造口患者及其护理人员感知社会支持多维量表的心理测量特征。
尽管社会支持在造口护理中非常重要,但感知社会支持多维量表(MSPSS)似乎尚未在造口护理中得到验证。本研究评估了 MSPSS 在造口患者及其非正式护理人员中的心理测量特征。通过确认性因素分析,对 775 名参与者的样本进行了 MSPSS 测试。内部一致性可靠性通过序数欧米茄系数进行评估。通过将 MSPSS 的得分与其他测量指标进行相关性假设检验,确定了标准相关有效性。针对患者和护理人员的 MSPSS 具有拟合良好的三因素结构。各因子的内部一致性可靠性极佳。MSPSS 评分与抑郁和造口相关 QoL 之间的负相关以及与感知到的相互性之间的正相关证明了并发有效性。我们的研究表明,MSPSS 是衡量造口患者及其护理人员社会支持的可靠指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
"We didn't even have time to worry about our mental health." Long-term impact of the pandemic on nursing professionals' experiences. Reporting heterogeneity in the associations between personality and health problems: Anchoring self-reports with health vignettes. Compassion in Italian palliative care: Investigating healthcre professionals' perspectives using focus groups. Identifying the ways in which tobacco cessation interventions have been tailored for sexual and gender minority individuals: A systematic review. Birth by emergency caesarean delivery: Perspectives of Wāhine Māori in Aotearoa New Zealand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1