Effectiveness of Cool and Green Roofs Inside and Outside Buildings in the Brazilian Context

IF 3.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.3390/su16188104
Taylana Piccinini Scolaro, Enedir Ghisi, Cristina Matos Silva
{"title":"Effectiveness of Cool and Green Roofs Inside and Outside Buildings in the Brazilian Context","authors":"Taylana Piccinini Scolaro, Enedir Ghisi, Cristina Matos Silva","doi":"10.3390/su16188104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies have assessed the thermal performance of green and cool roofs. However, few have comprehensively addressed Brazilian buildings and climates, considering indoor and outdoor environments. Considering three Brazilian cities, this study aims to assess the performance of green and cool roofs compared with traditional fibre cement roofs in a typical multifamily residential building. Energy consumption, thermal comfort, and outside surface temperature were assessed using computer simulation. The results show that the cool roofs performed better in cities with warmer climates (e.g., Cfa and Aw), reducing electricity consumption by up to 24.8% compared with traditional roofs. Green roofs are better suited for colder climates (e.g., Cfb), with up to 28.2% energy savings. Green roofs provided the highest percentage of thermal comfort hours in all climates. Cool and green roofs provided hourly reductions in outside roof surface temperature of up to 16.5 °C and 28.4 °C, respectively, compared with the traditional roof. This work reinforces that the choice between these two roof types for each city depends on the parameter used for comparison. Based on the relevant information applied to Brazilian buildings and representative climates presented, this work provided recommendations for urban planning policies and building regulations in Brazil.","PeriodicalId":22183,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several studies have assessed the thermal performance of green and cool roofs. However, few have comprehensively addressed Brazilian buildings and climates, considering indoor and outdoor environments. Considering three Brazilian cities, this study aims to assess the performance of green and cool roofs compared with traditional fibre cement roofs in a typical multifamily residential building. Energy consumption, thermal comfort, and outside surface temperature were assessed using computer simulation. The results show that the cool roofs performed better in cities with warmer climates (e.g., Cfa and Aw), reducing electricity consumption by up to 24.8% compared with traditional roofs. Green roofs are better suited for colder climates (e.g., Cfb), with up to 28.2% energy savings. Green roofs provided the highest percentage of thermal comfort hours in all climates. Cool and green roofs provided hourly reductions in outside roof surface temperature of up to 16.5 °C and 28.4 °C, respectively, compared with the traditional roof. This work reinforces that the choice between these two roof types for each city depends on the parameter used for comparison. Based on the relevant information applied to Brazilian buildings and representative climates presented, this work provided recommendations for urban planning policies and building regulations in Brazil.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西建筑内外凉爽屋顶和绿色屋顶的功效
有几项研究对绿色屋顶和凉爽屋顶的热性能进行了评估。然而,很少有研究对巴西的建筑和气候进行全面评估,同时考虑到室内和室外环境。考虑到巴西的三个城市,本研究旨在评估绿色凉爽屋顶与传统纤维水泥屋顶在典型多户住宅建筑中的性能比较。通过计算机模拟对能耗、热舒适度和室外表面温度进行了评估。结果显示,凉爽屋顶在气候较温暖的城市(如 Cfa 和 Aw)表现更佳,与传统屋顶相比,最多可减少 24.8% 的耗电量。绿色屋顶更适合气候寒冷的城市(如 Cfb),可节能 28.2%。在所有气候条件下,绿色屋顶提供的热舒适时间比例最高。与传统屋顶相比,凉爽屋顶和绿色屋顶每小时可使屋顶外表面温度分别降低 16.5 ℃ 和 28.4 ℃。这项研究进一步证明,每个城市在这两种屋顶类型之间的选择取决于用于比较的参数。根据应用于巴西建筑物和代表性气候的相关信息,这项工作为巴西的城市规划政策和建筑法规提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainability
Sustainability ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
20.50%
发文量
14120
审稿时长
17.72 days
期刊介绍: Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050) is an international and cross-disciplinary scholarly, open access journal of environmental, cultural, economic and social sustainability of human beings, which provides an advanced forum for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, communications and short notes, and there is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research relating to natural sciences, social sciences and humanities in as much detail as possible in order to promote scientific predictions and impact assessments of global change and development. Full experimental and methodical details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing EV Powertrain Performance and Sustainability through Constraint Prioritization in Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Semi-Active Bidirectional DC-DC Converter with HESS Fairness in E-Recruitment: Examining Procedural Justice Perceptions and Job Seekers’ Intentions The Impact of Waste Application on the Reclamation and Biological Life of Degraded Soils Influence of Terrain on Windblown Sand Flow Field Characteristics around Railway Culverts Improvement of Spatio-Temporal Inconsistency of Time Series Land Cover Products
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1