Construction and Evaluation of a Predictive Model for Grassroots Nurses’ Risk Perception of “Internet + Nursing Services”: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.2147/jmdh.s474769
Peiran Guo, Yuting Tan, Li Feng, Cui Liu, Jin Sun, Rong Cheng, Yanling Xiao, Xingxin Zhan, Lingjie Yang, Zhixia Zhang
{"title":"Construction and Evaluation of a Predictive Model for Grassroots Nurses’ Risk Perception of “Internet + Nursing Services”: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Peiran Guo, Yuting Tan, Li Feng, Cui Liu, Jin Sun, Rong Cheng, Yanling Xiao, Xingxin Zhan, Lingjie Yang, Zhixia Zhang","doi":"10.2147/jmdh.s474769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> The development of “Internet + nursing services” can effectively solve the problem of population aging, and grassroots nurses are the primary providers of such services in rural areas. This study aimed to analyze the factors affecting grassroots nurses’ risk perception of “Internet + nursing services” and construct a predictive model.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> A multicenter cross-sectional study of 2220 nurses from 27 secondary hospitals and 36 community health centers in Hubei Province was conducted from August to December 2023 using a multi-stage cluster sampling method. Information was collected through a structured anonymous questionnaire. A Chi-square test, a Welch <em>t</em>-test, and binary logistic regression analyses were employed to determine independent risk factors for grassroots nurses’ risk perception of “Internet + nursing services”, and a nomogram was constructed. Receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curves were plotted to evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and clinical effectiveness of the nomogram.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 2050 valid questionnaires were collected, demonstrating that 51.95% of grassroots nurses thought that “Internet + nursing services” was a medium-high risk. Age, other sources of income, knowledge about “Internet + nursing services”, personal safety, physical function, occupational exposure, social psychosocial, and time risk (<em>P</em>&lt; 0.05) were independent risk factors for grassroots nurses’ risk perception. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram was 0.939. The calibration and decision curve analyses demonstrated good calibration ability and clinical application values.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The prediction model constructed in this study has good prediction ability. Most grassroots nurses believe that “Internet + nursing services” are risky and influenced by several factors. It is suggested that the government and hospitals should formulate a unified charging standard, improve the safety guarantee, and gradually eliminate the concerns of grassroots nurses.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> grassroots nurse, Internet + nursing services, risk perception, predictive model<br/>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s474769","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The development of “Internet + nursing services” can effectively solve the problem of population aging, and grassroots nurses are the primary providers of such services in rural areas. This study aimed to analyze the factors affecting grassroots nurses’ risk perception of “Internet + nursing services” and construct a predictive model.
Patients and Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional study of 2220 nurses from 27 secondary hospitals and 36 community health centers in Hubei Province was conducted from August to December 2023 using a multi-stage cluster sampling method. Information was collected through a structured anonymous questionnaire. A Chi-square test, a Welch t-test, and binary logistic regression analyses were employed to determine independent risk factors for grassroots nurses’ risk perception of “Internet + nursing services”, and a nomogram was constructed. Receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curves were plotted to evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and clinical effectiveness of the nomogram.
Results: A total of 2050 valid questionnaires were collected, demonstrating that 51.95% of grassroots nurses thought that “Internet + nursing services” was a medium-high risk. Age, other sources of income, knowledge about “Internet + nursing services”, personal safety, physical function, occupational exposure, social psychosocial, and time risk (P< 0.05) were independent risk factors for grassroots nurses’ risk perception. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram was 0.939. The calibration and decision curve analyses demonstrated good calibration ability and clinical application values.
Conclusion: The prediction model constructed in this study has good prediction ability. Most grassroots nurses believe that “Internet + nursing services” are risky and influenced by several factors. It is suggested that the government and hospitals should formulate a unified charging standard, improve the safety guarantee, and gradually eliminate the concerns of grassroots nurses.

Keywords: grassroots nurse, Internet + nursing services, risk perception, predictive model
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基层护士对 "互联网+护理服务 "风险认知预测模型的构建与评估:多中心横断面研究
目的:发展 "互联网+护理服务 "可有效解决人口老龄化问题,而基层护士是农村地区 "互联网+护理服务 "的主要提供者。本研究旨在分析影响基层护士对 "互联网+护理服务 "风险认知的因素,并构建预测模型:采用多阶段整群抽样法,于 2023 年 8 月至 12 月对湖北省 27 家二级医院和 36 家社区卫生服务中心的 2220 名护士进行了多中心横断面研究。通过结构化匿名问卷收集信息。采用Chi-square检验、Welch t检验和二元Logistic回归分析确定基层护士对 "互联网+护理服务 "风险感知的独立风险因素,并构建提名图。绘制了接收者操作特征曲线、校正曲线和决策曲线,以评价提名图的区分度、校正性和临床有效性:共回收有效问卷 2050 份,51.95%的基层护士认为 "互联网+护理服务 "属于中高风险。年龄、其他收入来源、对 "互联网+护理服务 "的了解程度、人身安全、身体功能、职业暴露、社会心理、时间风险(P< 0.05)是影响基层护士风险认知的独立风险因素。提名图的接收者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.939。校准和决策曲线分析表明该模型具有良好的校准能力和临床应用价值:本研究构建的预测模型具有良好的预测能力。大多数基层护士认为 "互联网+护理服务 "存在风险,受多种因素影响。关键词:基层护士;互联网+护理服务;风险认知;预测模型
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and Stakeholder Views of Community-Based Allied Health on Acute Care Utilization: A Mixed Methods Review. Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Transformative Approach to the Detection of Prediabetes. Effect of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Genome Variability for the Development of Coronary Heart Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Bibliometric Analysis. Mapping the Future: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA in Colorectal Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1