Novel protocol for prevention from hepatitis B reactivation following living‐donor liver transplantation

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Hepatology Research Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1111/hepr.14110
Takuma Izumi, Takeo Toshima, Shinji Itoh, Shohei Yoshiya, Yuki Bekki, Norifumi Iseda, Yuriko Tsutsui, Katsuya Toshida, Yuki Nakayama, Takuma Ishikawa, Tomoharu Yoshizumi
{"title":"Novel protocol for prevention from hepatitis B reactivation following living‐donor liver transplantation","authors":"Takuma Izumi, Takeo Toshima, Shinji Itoh, Shohei Yoshiya, Yuki Bekki, Norifumi Iseda, Yuriko Tsutsui, Katsuya Toshida, Yuki Nakayama, Takuma Ishikawa, Tomoharu Yoshizumi","doi":"10.1111/hepr.14110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimReactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) after liver transplantation (LT) remains a problem; thus, development of more effective HBV reactivation prophylaxis is desirable. We evaluated the efficacy of a combination of a long‐term nucleotide analog (NA), such as entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), and short‐term hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in preventing HBV reactivation and compared it with conventional HBV prophylaxis.MethodsBetween February 1999 and August 2023, 135 patients underwent living‐donor liver transplantation for liver cirrhosis or acute liver failure caused by HBV infection or received an LT from a hepatitis B core antibody‐positive donor. Recipients who had undergone LT were classified as being in the first or second era (namely until September 2017 and from October 2017), respectively, and outcomes of prophylaxis against HBV reactivation were compared between the two eras.ResultsIn the second era, recipients with HBV‐related disease or who had received hepatitis B core antibody‐positive liver received combination therapy with short‐term HBIG and an NA such as TAF and ETV long‐term. The duration of HBIG treatment was markedly shorter than in the first era in both categories of patients and HBIG could be discontinued in all cases. Surprisingly, we observed HBV reactivation in the first era, but not in the second era, in both groups.ConclusionsWe have established a protocol for prophylaxis against HBV reactivation using a combination of short‐term HBIG and long‐term NA. This protocol was found to be sufficient to prevent HBV reactivation after LT.","PeriodicalId":12987,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.14110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimReactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) after liver transplantation (LT) remains a problem; thus, development of more effective HBV reactivation prophylaxis is desirable. We evaluated the efficacy of a combination of a long‐term nucleotide analog (NA), such as entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), and short‐term hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in preventing HBV reactivation and compared it with conventional HBV prophylaxis.MethodsBetween February 1999 and August 2023, 135 patients underwent living‐donor liver transplantation for liver cirrhosis or acute liver failure caused by HBV infection or received an LT from a hepatitis B core antibody‐positive donor. Recipients who had undergone LT were classified as being in the first or second era (namely until September 2017 and from October 2017), respectively, and outcomes of prophylaxis against HBV reactivation were compared between the two eras.ResultsIn the second era, recipients with HBV‐related disease or who had received hepatitis B core antibody‐positive liver received combination therapy with short‐term HBIG and an NA such as TAF and ETV long‐term. The duration of HBIG treatment was markedly shorter than in the first era in both categories of patients and HBIG could be discontinued in all cases. Surprisingly, we observed HBV reactivation in the first era, but not in the second era, in both groups.ConclusionsWe have established a protocol for prophylaxis against HBV reactivation using a combination of short‐term HBIG and long‐term NA. This protocol was found to be sufficient to prevent HBV reactivation after LT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活体肝移植后预防乙型肝炎再激活的新方案
目的肝移植(LT)后乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)再活化仍是一个问题;因此,开发更有效的 HBV 再活化预防方法是可取的。我们评估了恩替卡韦(ETV)或替诺福韦阿拉非那胺(TAF)等长期核苷酸类似物(NA)与短期乙型肝炎免疫球蛋白(HBIG)联合使用预防 HBV 再激活的效果,并与传统的 HBV 预防方法进行了比较。方法1999年2月至2023年8月期间,135名患者因HBV感染引起的肝硬化或急性肝功能衰竭接受了活体肝移植,或接受了乙肝核心抗体阳性供体的LT。接受过LT的受者分别被划分为第一或第二时代(即2017年9月之前和2017年10月起),并比较了两个时代预防HBV再激活的结果。结果在第二时代,患有HBV相关疾病或接受过乙肝核心抗体阳性肝脏的受者接受短期HBIG和NA(如TAF和ETV)长期联合治疗。在这两类患者中,HBIG 治疗的持续时间明显短于第一个疗程,而且所有病例都可以停用 HBIG。令人惊讶的是,我们在第一阶段观察到了 HBV 再激活,但在第二阶段,两组患者均未观察到 HBV 再激活。我们发现,该方案足以预防 LT 后的 HBV 再激活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology Research
Hepatology Research 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
124
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Hepatology Research (formerly International Hepatology Communications) is the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology, and publishes original articles, reviews and short comunications dealing with hepatology. Reviews or mini-reviews are especially welcomed from those areas within hepatology undergoing rapid changes. Short communications should contain concise definitive information.
期刊最新文献
Distinct characteristics of MetALD (metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease with greater alcohol consumption) in the general population. Unveiling the dynamics of hepatitis C virus transmission among injection drug users and men who have sex with men: A comprehensive study in Japan. Issue Information Diagnostic accuracy of hepatitis E virus antibody tests: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Risk model for predicting failure to rescue after hepatectomy: Cohort study of 1371 consecutive patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1