{"title":"A retrospective comparative study of extensive sinus membrane perforations repairing using collagen membranes with pouch and nonpouch techniques","authors":"Liang Xia DDS, MD , Zonghe Xu DDS, MD , Duohong Zou DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of employing collagen membranes with pouch and nonpouch techniques to repair extensive maxillary sinus membrane perforation.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Patients who experienced extensive maxillary sinus membrane perforation (>10 mm) during lateral window maxillary sinus floor elevation (LWMSFE) were included and treated with either the pouch or nonpouch techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The number of patients treated with the pouch technique and those treated with the nonpouch technique was 10 each. For the pouch and nonpouch techniques, the mean vertical bone height gain were 17.04 ± 1.64 mm and 16.42 ± 2.41 mm; the mean bone density were 720.10 ± 20.58 HU and 692.85 ± 40.03 HU; and the mean bone augmentation volume were 2720.07 ± 680.58 mm<sup>3</sup> and 3238.84 ± 781.02 mm<sup>3</sup>. The mean vertical bone height gain, bone density, and bone augmentation volume were not statistically different between two techniques (<em>P</em> > .05). No implant was observed for loss during the follow-up period of 8-12 months after crown placement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The success of the pouch and nonpouch techniques in repairing extensive membrane perforation is evident in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes. Regardless of whether the pouch or nonpouch technique is used; secure and stable implant restoration results can be achieved after the maxillary sinus membrane perforation is repaired.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49010,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","volume":"139 2","pages":"Pages 166-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324004589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of employing collagen membranes with pouch and nonpouch techniques to repair extensive maxillary sinus membrane perforation.
Study design
Patients who experienced extensive maxillary sinus membrane perforation (>10 mm) during lateral window maxillary sinus floor elevation (LWMSFE) were included and treated with either the pouch or nonpouch techniques.
Results
The number of patients treated with the pouch technique and those treated with the nonpouch technique was 10 each. For the pouch and nonpouch techniques, the mean vertical bone height gain were 17.04 ± 1.64 mm and 16.42 ± 2.41 mm; the mean bone density were 720.10 ± 20.58 HU and 692.85 ± 40.03 HU; and the mean bone augmentation volume were 2720.07 ± 680.58 mm3 and 3238.84 ± 781.02 mm3. The mean vertical bone height gain, bone density, and bone augmentation volume were not statistically different between two techniques (P > .05). No implant was observed for loss during the follow-up period of 8-12 months after crown placement.
Conclusions
The success of the pouch and nonpouch techniques in repairing extensive membrane perforation is evident in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes. Regardless of whether the pouch or nonpouch technique is used; secure and stable implant restoration results can be achieved after the maxillary sinus membrane perforation is repaired.
期刊介绍:
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology is required reading for anyone in the fields of oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology or advanced general practice dentistry. It is the only major dental journal that provides a practical and complete overview of the medical and surgical techniques of dental practice in four areas. Topics covered include such current issues as dental implants, treatment of HIV-infected patients, and evaluation and treatment of TMJ disorders. The official publication for nine societies, the Journal is recommended for initial purchase in the Brandon Hill study, Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library.