A retrospective comparative study of extensive sinus membrane perforations repairing using collagen membranes with pouch and nonpouch techniques

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.019
Liang Xia DDS, MD , Zonghe Xu DDS, MD , Duohong Zou DDS, PhD
{"title":"A retrospective comparative study of extensive sinus membrane perforations repairing using collagen membranes with pouch and nonpouch techniques","authors":"Liang Xia DDS, MD ,&nbsp;Zonghe Xu DDS, MD ,&nbsp;Duohong Zou DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.oooo.2024.08.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of employing collagen membranes with pouch and nonpouch techniques to repair extensive maxillary sinus membrane perforation.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Patients who experienced extensive maxillary sinus membrane perforation (&gt;10 mm) during lateral window maxillary sinus floor elevation (LWMSFE) were included and treated with either the pouch or nonpouch techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The number of patients treated with the pouch technique and those treated with the nonpouch technique was 10 each. For the pouch and nonpouch techniques, the mean vertical bone height gain were 17.04 ± 1.64 mm and 16.42 ± 2.41 mm; the mean bone density were 720.10 ± 20.58 HU and 692.85 ± 40.03 HU; and the mean bone augmentation volume were 2720.07 ± 680.58 mm<sup>3</sup> and 3238.84 ± 781.02 mm<sup>3</sup>. The mean vertical bone height gain, bone density, and bone augmentation volume were not statistically different between two techniques (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). No implant was observed for loss during the follow-up period of 8-12 months after crown placement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The success of the pouch and nonpouch techniques in repairing extensive membrane perforation is evident in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes. Regardless of whether the pouch or nonpouch technique is used; secure and stable implant restoration results can be achieved after the maxillary sinus membrane perforation is repaired.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49010,"journal":{"name":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","volume":"139 2","pages":"Pages 166-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212440324004589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of employing collagen membranes with pouch and nonpouch techniques to repair extensive maxillary sinus membrane perforation.

Study design

Patients who experienced extensive maxillary sinus membrane perforation (>10 mm) during lateral window maxillary sinus floor elevation (LWMSFE) were included and treated with either the pouch or nonpouch techniques.

Results

The number of patients treated with the pouch technique and those treated with the nonpouch technique was 10 each. For the pouch and nonpouch techniques, the mean vertical bone height gain were 17.04 ± 1.64 mm and 16.42 ± 2.41 mm; the mean bone density were 720.10 ± 20.58 HU and 692.85 ± 40.03 HU; and the mean bone augmentation volume were 2720.07 ± 680.58 mm3 and 3238.84 ± 781.02 mm3. The mean vertical bone height gain, bone density, and bone augmentation volume were not statistically different between two techniques (P > .05). No implant was observed for loss during the follow-up period of 8-12 months after crown placement.

Conclusions

The success of the pouch and nonpouch techniques in repairing extensive membrane perforation is evident in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes. Regardless of whether the pouch or nonpouch technique is used; secure and stable implant restoration results can be achieved after the maxillary sinus membrane perforation is repaired.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用胶原蛋白膜修复广泛性鼻窦膜穿孔的回顾性比较研究(带袋和不带袋技术
评估采用胶原蛋白膜和无膜袋技术修复广泛性上颌窦膜穿孔的临床和放射学效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology
Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
1217
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology is required reading for anyone in the fields of oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology or advanced general practice dentistry. It is the only major dental journal that provides a practical and complete overview of the medical and surgical techniques of dental practice in four areas. Topics covered include such current issues as dental implants, treatment of HIV-infected patients, and evaluation and treatment of TMJ disorders. The official publication for nine societies, the Journal is recommended for initial purchase in the Brandon Hill study, Selected List of Books and Journals for the Small Medical Library.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to 'Cocamidopropyl betaine: another possible oral healthcare chemical associated with plasma cell lesions of the oral cavity'[Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology Volume 140, Issue 2, (2025), Pages 218-226]. Corrigendum to 'What's in your toothpaste? A review of toothpaste ingredients and rationale for their use or avoidance' [Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology Volume 140, Issue 6, (2025), Pages 807-812]. Table of Contents Editorial Board Society Page
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1