Nurse experiences and perspectives with missed nursing care during COVID‐19: A qualitative study

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70042
Monica Rochman, Austin Mount‐Campbell, Catherine Shull Fernald
{"title":"Nurse experiences and perspectives with missed nursing care during COVID‐19: A qualitative study","authors":"Monica Rochman, Austin Mount‐Campbell, Catherine Shull Fernald","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimThis study aimed to determine clinical nurse and nurse manager perspectives on missed nursing care (MNC) during the COVID‐19 pandemic.DesignThis study utilized a qualitative exploratory descriptive design.MethodsData were obtained through focus groups and virtual interviews. Purposive sampling was used to select nurse and nurse manager participants in COVID‐19 units and the Emergency Department in one large healthcare organization in the northeastern United States of America.ResultsA total of 15 nurses and nurse managers participated in the study. Results revealed five categories: medication delivery, turning patients, double checks, communication and rapport, and patient surveillance.ConclusionsA variety of factors contributed to the perceptions and experiences of MNC of COVID‐19 patients during the early stage of the pandemic. The COVID‐19 crisis put additional and unparalleled pressure on a strained nursing workforce. Hospital leaders are responsible for ensuring their frontline nurses have the resources they need to feel supported in their roles regardless of the presenting circumstances.Implications for the ProfessionNurse leaders should employ evidence‐based strategies such as promoting and championing teamwork to support staff and reduce incidences of MNC during crises. Our current work may serve as a basis for informing future revisions of pre‐pandemic measurement tools when applied in a pandemic‐specific context.Reporting MethodsThis manuscript adheres to the standards for reporting qualitative research (SRQR); a synthesis of recommendations.Public ContributionThere was not patient or public contribution for this study.","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimThis study aimed to determine clinical nurse and nurse manager perspectives on missed nursing care (MNC) during the COVID‐19 pandemic.DesignThis study utilized a qualitative exploratory descriptive design.MethodsData were obtained through focus groups and virtual interviews. Purposive sampling was used to select nurse and nurse manager participants in COVID‐19 units and the Emergency Department in one large healthcare organization in the northeastern United States of America.ResultsA total of 15 nurses and nurse managers participated in the study. Results revealed five categories: medication delivery, turning patients, double checks, communication and rapport, and patient surveillance.ConclusionsA variety of factors contributed to the perceptions and experiences of MNC of COVID‐19 patients during the early stage of the pandemic. The COVID‐19 crisis put additional and unparalleled pressure on a strained nursing workforce. Hospital leaders are responsible for ensuring their frontline nurses have the resources they need to feel supported in their roles regardless of the presenting circumstances.Implications for the ProfessionNurse leaders should employ evidence‐based strategies such as promoting and championing teamwork to support staff and reduce incidences of MNC during crises. Our current work may serve as a basis for informing future revisions of pre‐pandemic measurement tools when applied in a pandemic‐specific context.Reporting MethodsThis manuscript adheres to the standards for reporting qualitative research (SRQR); a synthesis of recommendations.Public ContributionThere was not patient or public contribution for this study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护士在 COVID-19 期间错过护理的经历和观点:定性研究
目的 本研究旨在确定临床护士和护士长对 COVID-19 大流行期间护理工作缺失(MNC)的看法。在美国东北部一家大型医疗机构的 COVID-19 单位和急诊科中,采用了有目的的抽样方法来选择护士和护士管理人员。结果显示了五个类别:给药、为病人翻身、双重检查、沟通与默契以及病人监护。结论 在大流行病的早期阶段,多种因素促成了 COVID-19 病人对 MNC 的看法和体验。COVID-19 危机给紧张的护理人员队伍带来了前所未有的额外压力。医院领导有责任确保他们的一线护士拥有所需的资源,使其在任何情况下都能感受到支持。我们目前的工作可作为未来修订大流行前测量工具的基础,以便在大流行的特定背景下应用。报告方法本手稿遵循定性研究报告标准(SRQR);建议综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
期刊最新文献
The mediating role of psychological resilience in the effect of strength of religious faith on coping with stress in people with type 2 diabetes: A SEM analysis Nurse experiences and perspectives with missed nursing care during COVID‐19: A qualitative study A comparison of work characteristics and health status between Korean and US hospital nurses Practicing nurses' and nursing students' perceptions of climate change: A scoping review Health literacy and diabetes information preferences among Chinese immigrants: An Australian cross‐sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1