Interventions to Increase Thriving Amongst Older People in Care Homes and Factors Contributing to Their Thriving Experience-A Scoping Review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Nursing Open Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70164
Ann-Sofie Silvennoinen, Harriet Finne-Soveri, Lisbeth Fagerström
{"title":"Interventions to Increase Thriving Amongst Older People in Care Homes and Factors Contributing to Their Thriving Experience-A Scoping Review.","authors":"Ann-Sofie Silvennoinen, Harriet Finne-Soveri, Lisbeth Fagerström","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim was to map and describe the state of knowledge regarding interventions to promote thriving amongst older people in care homes and the factors that affect their experience of thriving.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping review.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>A scoping review based on the methodological framework by Arksey and O'Malley and presented following the PAGER (Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for Practice, and Research recommendations) framework.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Five electronic databases were searched for studies published between 2012 and 2022. From a total of 185 studies found, 17 met the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study recognised five factors that contribute to thriving: the resident's attitude towards living in a care home, the quality of care and caregivers, activities and interactions with others, qualities of the physical environment and health. Two studies reporting interventions were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review highlights the scarcity of knowledge regarding older people's experience of thriving in care homes. The review results could contribute to our understanding of the factors involved and interventions needed to improve thriving.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession and/or patient care: </strong>The focus should be on education and the development of working methods that could improve thriving in care homes.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The Prisma ScR-checklist was used.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"12 3","pages":"e70164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim was to map and describe the state of knowledge regarding interventions to promote thriving amongst older people in care homes and the factors that affect their experience of thriving.

Design: A scoping review.

Review methods: A scoping review based on the methodological framework by Arksey and O'Malley and presented following the PAGER (Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for Practice, and Research recommendations) framework.

Data sources: Five electronic databases were searched for studies published between 2012 and 2022. From a total of 185 studies found, 17 met the inclusion criteria.

Results: This study recognised five factors that contribute to thriving: the resident's attitude towards living in a care home, the quality of care and caregivers, activities and interactions with others, qualities of the physical environment and health. Two studies reporting interventions were identified.

Conclusion: This scoping review highlights the scarcity of knowledge regarding older people's experience of thriving in care homes. The review results could contribute to our understanding of the factors involved and interventions needed to improve thriving.

Implications for the profession and/or patient care: The focus should be on education and the development of working methods that could improve thriving in care homes.

Reporting method: The Prisma ScR-checklist was used.

Patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在养老院中增加老年人繁荣的干预措施和促进他们繁荣体验的因素-范围审查。
目的:目的是绘制和描述有关干预措施的知识状态,以促进养老院中老年人的繁荣发展,以及影响他们繁荣发展的因素。设计:范围审查。综述方法:基于Arksey和O'Malley的方法论框架,并按照PAGER(模式、进展、差距、实践证据和研究建议)框架提出的范围综述。数据来源:检索了五个电子数据库,检索了2012年至2022年间发表的研究。在共发现的185项研究中,有17项符合纳入标准。结果:这项研究确认了促进健康的五个因素:居民对在养老院生活的态度、护理和护理人员的质量、活动和与他人的互动、物理环境的质量和健康。确认了两项报告干预措施的研究。结论:这一范围审查强调了关于老年人在养老院茁壮成长的经验的知识的稀缺性。审查结果有助于我们了解所涉及的因素和改善繁荣所需的干预措施。对专业和/或病人护理的影响:重点应该放在教育和工作方法的发展上,这些方法可以改善养老院的繁荣。报告方法:采用Prisma ScR-checklist。患者或公众捐款:没有患者或公众捐款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Information Generated by ChatGPT on Preventing Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Infections. Anxiety, Social Support and Coping Strategies in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Haemodialysis. Gentle Persuasive Approaches Dementia Education Improves Staff Self-Efficacy and Knowledge in a Post-Acute Care Hospital: A Quality Improvement Project. Latent Profile Analysis of Self-Management Ability and Its Influencing Factors in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. A Preliminary Exploration of the Behavioural Criteria of Ethical Care With Dementia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1