A systematic evaluation of the performance and properties of the UK Biobank Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) Release.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0307270
Deborah J Thompson,Daniel Wells,Saskia Selzam,Iliana Peneva,Rachel Moore,Kevin Sharp,William A Tarran,Edward J Beard,Fernando Riveros-Mckay,Carla Giner-Delgado,Duncan Palmer,Priyanka Seth,James Harrison,Marta Futema,,Gil McVean,Vincent Plagnol,Peter Donnelly,Michael E Weale
{"title":"A systematic evaluation of the performance and properties of the UK Biobank Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) Release.","authors":"Deborah J Thompson,Daniel Wells,Saskia Selzam,Iliana Peneva,Rachel Moore,Kevin Sharp,William A Tarran,Edward J Beard,Fernando Riveros-Mckay,Carla Giner-Delgado,Duncan Palmer,Priyanka Seth,James Harrison,Marta Futema,,Gil McVean,Vincent Plagnol,Peter Donnelly,Michael E Weale","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0307270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We assess the UK Biobank (UKB) Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) Release, a set of PRSs for 28 diseases and 25 quantitative traits that has been made available on the individuals in UKB, using a unified pipeline for PRS evaluation. We also release a benchmarking software tool to enable like-for-like performance evaluation for different PRSs for the same disease or trait. Extensive benchmarking shows the PRSs in the UKB Release to outperform a broad set of 76 published PRSs. For many of the diseases and traits we also validate the PRS algorithms in a separate cohort (100,000 Genomes Project). The availability of PRSs for 53 traits on the same set of individuals also allows a systematic assessment of their properties, and the increased power of these PRSs increases the evidence for their potential clinical benefit.","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We assess the UK Biobank (UKB) Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) Release, a set of PRSs for 28 diseases and 25 quantitative traits that has been made available on the individuals in UKB, using a unified pipeline for PRS evaluation. We also release a benchmarking software tool to enable like-for-like performance evaluation for different PRSs for the same disease or trait. Extensive benchmarking shows the PRSs in the UKB Release to outperform a broad set of 76 published PRSs. For many of the diseases and traits we also validate the PRS algorithms in a separate cohort (100,000 Genomes Project). The availability of PRSs for 53 traits on the same set of individuals also allows a systematic assessment of their properties, and the increased power of these PRSs increases the evidence for their potential clinical benefit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对英国生物库多基因风险评分 (PRS) 发布的性能和特性进行系统评估。
我们评估了英国生物库(UKB)发布的多基因风险评分(PRS),这是一套针对 28 种疾病和 25 个定量性状的多基因风险评分,已在英国生物库的个体中发布,采用了统一的多基因风险评分评估流程。我们还发布了一个基准软件工具,可对同一疾病或性状的不同 PRS 进行类似性能评估。广泛的基准测试表明,UKB Release 中的 PRS 优于已发布的 76 种 PRS。对于许多疾病和性状,我们还在一个单独的群组(10 万基因组项目)中验证了 PRS 算法。针对同一组个体的 53 个性状的 PRS 也允许对其特性进行系统性评估,这些 PRS 的能力的提高增加了其潜在临床益处的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
"What does this mean for our future?" uncertainty management in mothers' narratives about the diagnosis and birth of their child with Down syndrome. A multimodal understanding of the role of sound and music in gendered toy marketing. Evaluation of the Vaginal Panel Realtime PCR kit (Vircell, SL) for diagnosing vaginitis: A comparative study with routinely used diagnostics. Fault-tolerant partition resolvability of cycle with chord. Few-shot learning for inference in medical imaging with subspace feature representations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1