Exploring academic and clinical nurses’ perspectives on evidence-based nursing course for undergraduates from perspectives of academic-practice partnerships: a qualitative study

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2024-09-15 DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-02223-1
Guiyun Wang, Yuting Xia, Qirong Chen, Xirongguli Halili, Hui Huang
{"title":"Exploring academic and clinical nurses’ perspectives on evidence-based nursing course for undergraduates from perspectives of academic-practice partnerships: a qualitative study","authors":"Guiyun Wang, Yuting Xia, Qirong Chen, Xirongguli Halili, Hui Huang","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02223-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To explore nurses’ perceptions of evidence-based nursing courses for undergraduates through academic-practice partnerships. A deductive thematic analysis based on the practice-academic logic model. Fifteen academic and clinical nurses were interviewed between November and December 2023, either online or through face-to-face meetings. Each interview lasted 20–30 min. The interview outline was constructed based on the practice-academic partnership logic model, which was followed during the process of recorded, analyzed, and checked. Themes identified include inputs (e.g., stakeholder commitment), activities (e.g., communication), outputs (e.g., nursing projects), and outcomes (e.g., improved competence). These themes highlight the various aspects and outcomes of academic-practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing courses. Effective academic-practice partnerships are crucial for developing evidence-based nursing courses, leading to positive educational and professional outcomes. Nurses’ perceptions provide valuable guidelines for developing effective evidence-based nursing courses. No patient or public users participated in this study.","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02223-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore nurses’ perceptions of evidence-based nursing courses for undergraduates through academic-practice partnerships. A deductive thematic analysis based on the practice-academic logic model. Fifteen academic and clinical nurses were interviewed between November and December 2023, either online or through face-to-face meetings. Each interview lasted 20–30 min. The interview outline was constructed based on the practice-academic partnership logic model, which was followed during the process of recorded, analyzed, and checked. Themes identified include inputs (e.g., stakeholder commitment), activities (e.g., communication), outputs (e.g., nursing projects), and outcomes (e.g., improved competence). These themes highlight the various aspects and outcomes of academic-practice partnerships in evidence-based nursing courses. Effective academic-practice partnerships are crucial for developing evidence-based nursing courses, leading to positive educational and professional outcomes. Nurses’ perceptions provide valuable guidelines for developing effective evidence-based nursing courses. No patient or public users participated in this study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从学术与实践合作的角度探讨学术和临床护士对本科生循证护理课程的看法:一项定性研究
探讨护士对通过学术-实践合作为本科生开设循证护理课程的看法。基于实践-学术逻辑模型进行演绎式主题分析。2023 年 11 月至 12 月期间,15 名学术和临床护士接受了在线或面对面访谈。每次访谈持续 20-30 分钟。访谈提纲是根据实践-学术合作逻辑模型构建的,在记录、分析和检查过程中遵循了这一逻辑模型。确定的主题包括投入(如利益相关者的承诺)、活动(如沟通)、产出(如护理项目)和结果(如能力的提高)。这些主题突出了循证护理课程中学术与实践合作的各个方面和成果。有效的学术与实践合作对于开发循证护理课程至关重要,可带来积极的教育和专业成果。护士的看法为开发有效的循证护理课程提供了宝贵的指导。本研究没有病人或公众用户参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Coping strategies of intensive care units nurses in alarm management: a qualitative research study. Cultural translation of the ethical dimension: a study on the reliability and validity of the Chinese nurses' professional ethical dilemma scale. Effectiveness of donning and doffing personal protective equipment education using video debriefing among Korean undergraduate nursing students. Relationship between perceived value, attitudes, and academic motivation in distance learning among nursing students in rural areas. Testing the validity and reliability of the Korean nursing surveillance scale: a methodological study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1