Clinical efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL European Journal of Medical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1186/s40001-024-02046-5
Shao-Wei Lo, Tsung-Hsuan Hung, Yen-Tsen Lin, Chun-Shen Lee, Chiung-Yu Chen, Ching-Ju Fang, Pei-Chun Lai
{"title":"Clinical efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis","authors":"Shao-Wei Lo, Tsung-Hsuan Hung, Yen-Tsen Lin, Chun-Shen Lee, Chiung-Yu Chen, Ching-Ju Fang, Pei-Chun Lai","doi":"10.1186/s40001-024-02046-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We searched four databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared FMT with a control intervention in patients with IBS. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool was chosen for appraisal. Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted. Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence (CoE). We included 12 RCTs with a total of 615 participants. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference between the FMT and control groups in terms of clinical responses (relative risk [RR] = 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–2.33) and changes in IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) scores (standardised mean difference [SMD] = − 0.31, 95% CI − 0.72 to 0.09) and IBS Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) scores (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI − 0.09 to 0.69). Subgroup analysis revealed that in studies with low RoB and using endoscopy, nasojejunal tube and rectal enema delivery, FMT led to a significant improvement in clinical responses and changes in IBS-SSS and IBS-QOL scores. TSA suggested that the current evidence is inconclusive and that the CoE is very low. This study suggests that patients with IBS may benefit from FMT especially when it is administered via endoscopy, nasojejunal tube or rectal enema. However, the certainty of evidence is very low. Further research is needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of FMT for IBS treatment. Trial Registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42020211002.","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-024-02046-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We searched four databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared FMT with a control intervention in patients with IBS. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool was chosen for appraisal. Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted. Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the certainty of evidence (CoE). We included 12 RCTs with a total of 615 participants. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference between the FMT and control groups in terms of clinical responses (relative risk [RR] = 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–2.33) and changes in IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) scores (standardised mean difference [SMD] = − 0.31, 95% CI − 0.72 to 0.09) and IBS Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) scores (SMD = 0.30, 95% CI − 0.09 to 0.69). Subgroup analysis revealed that in studies with low RoB and using endoscopy, nasojejunal tube and rectal enema delivery, FMT led to a significant improvement in clinical responses and changes in IBS-SSS and IBS-QOL scores. TSA suggested that the current evidence is inconclusive and that the CoE is very low. This study suggests that patients with IBS may benefit from FMT especially when it is administered via endoscopy, nasojejunal tube or rectal enema. However, the certainty of evidence is very low. Further research is needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of FMT for IBS treatment. Trial Registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42020211002.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粪便微生物群移植治疗肠易激综合征的临床疗效和安全性:系统综述、荟萃分析和试验序列分析
本研究旨在评估粪便微生物群移植(FMT)治疗肠易激综合征(IBS)的有效性和安全性。我们在四个数据库中检索了对肠易激综合征患者进行 FMT 与对照干预比较的随机对照试验 (RCT)。我们选择了修订版 Cochrane 偏倚风险 (RoB) 工具进行评估。采用试验序列分析(TSA)进行了元分析。采用建议评估发展与评价分级法(GRADE)评估证据的确定性(CoE)。我们纳入了 12 项 RCT,共有 615 名参与者。元分析表明,在临床反应(相对风险 [RR] = 1.44,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.88-2.33)和肠易激综合征严重程度评分系统 (IBS-SSS) 评分变化(标准化平均差 [SMD] = - 0.31,95% CI - 0.72 至 0.09)以及肠易激综合征生活质量 (IBS-QOL) 评分(SMD = 0.30,95% CI - 0.09 至 0.69)方面,FMT 组和对照组之间没有显著差异。亚组分析显示,在RoB较低、使用内窥镜、鼻空肠管和直肠灌肠给药的研究中,FMT可显著改善临床反应以及IBS-SSS和IBS-QOL评分的变化。TSA 认为,目前的证据尚无定论,且 CoE 很低。这项研究表明,肠易激综合征患者可能从 FMT 中获益,尤其是通过内窥镜、鼻空肠管或直肠灌肠进行治疗时。然而,证据的确定性很低。要确认FMT治疗肠易激综合征的有效性和安全性,还需要进一步的研究。试验注册:PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42020211002。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Shugan Hewei formula combined with rabeprazole in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with primary liver cancer with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a comparative analysis of different perfusion chemotherapeutic regimens Clinical efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis Fungi identified via next-generation sequencing in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid among patients with COVID-19: a retrospective study Intraoperative pneumatic tourniquet application reduces soft-tissue microcirculation, but without affecting wound healing in calcaneal fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1