Real-world outcomes in patients with hereditary angioedema prescribed lanadelumab versus other prophylaxis.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by painful, debilitating, and potentiallyfatal swelling attacks. Lanadelumab is approved as long-term prophylaxis (LTP) in patients with HAE. However, realworld data on LTP use in patients with HAE are limited. OBJECTIVE To describe clinical characteristics, attack history, and quality of life (QoL) of patients with HAE type I/II whowere receiving lanadelumab or other LTPs. METHODS Data were drawn from the Adelphi HAE Disease Specific Program, a cross-sectional survey of HAE physicians conducted in the United States from July to November 2021. Physician-reported disease characteristics, HAE attack frequency, and QoL were compared among patients receiving lanadelumab or other LTPs for at least 12 months. RESULTS Physicians reported data for 144 patients, of whom 29 had received lanadelumab and 115 had received another prophylaxis for at least 12 months. The mean +/- standard deviation number of attacks in the previous 12 months was loweramong patients receiving lanadelumab than other LTPs (2.3 +/- 3.1 versus 3.4 +/- 2.8, respectively; p = 0.075). Although bothgroups had similar current disease activity and severity, more patients receiving lanadelumab versus other LTPs had high disease activity (51.7% versus 12.5%, respectively; p < 0.0001) and disease severity rated as severe (51.7% versus 16.1%, respectively; p = 0.0001) at diagnosis. Physicians reported that more patients who received lanadelumab had good or very good QoL(72.4%) than those receiving other LTPs (36.5%) (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION Analysis of these findings suggests lower attack frequency, lower symptomatic impact, and better QoL inpatients treated with lanadelumab than another prophylaxis in a real-world setting.