Bird Name-a-thon: Categorizing English bird names using crowdsourcing

Erin S. Morrison, Guinevere P. Pandolfi, Stepfanie M. Aguillon, Jarome R. Ali, Olivia Archard, Daniel T Baldassarre, Illeana Baquero, Kevin F.P. Bennett, Kevin M. Bonney, Riley Bryant, Rosanne M. Catanach, Therese A. Catanach, Ida Chavoshan, Sarah N. Davis, Brooke D. Goodman, Eric R. Gulson-Castillo, Matthew Hack, Jocelyn Hudon, Gavin M. Leighton, Kira M. Long, Ziqi Ma, Dakota E. McCoy, J. F. McLaughlin, Gaia Rueda Moreno, Talia M. Mota, Lara Noguchi, Ugo Nwigwe, Teresa Pegan, Kaiya Provost, Shauna Ann Rasband, Jessie F Salter, Lauren C. Silvernail, Jared A. Simard, Heather R. Skeen, Juliana Soto-Patino, Young Ha Suh, Qingyue Wang, Matthew E. Warshauer, Sissy Yan, Betsy Zalinski, Ziqi Zhao, Allison J. Shultz
{"title":"Bird Name-a-thon: Categorizing English bird names using crowdsourcing","authors":"Erin S. Morrison, Guinevere P. Pandolfi, Stepfanie M. Aguillon, Jarome R. Ali, Olivia Archard, Daniel T Baldassarre, Illeana Baquero, Kevin F.P. Bennett, Kevin M. Bonney, Riley Bryant, Rosanne M. Catanach, Therese A. Catanach, Ida Chavoshan, Sarah N. Davis, Brooke D. Goodman, Eric R. Gulson-Castillo, Matthew Hack, Jocelyn Hudon, Gavin M. Leighton, Kira M. Long, Ziqi Ma, Dakota E. McCoy, J. F. McLaughlin, Gaia Rueda Moreno, Talia M. Mota, Lara Noguchi, Ugo Nwigwe, Teresa Pegan, Kaiya Provost, Shauna Ann Rasband, Jessie F Salter, Lauren C. Silvernail, Jared A. Simard, Heather R. Skeen, Juliana Soto-Patino, Young Ha Suh, Qingyue Wang, Matthew E. Warshauer, Sissy Yan, Betsy Zalinski, Ziqi Zhao, Allison J. Shultz","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.13.612884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Common names of species are important for communicating with the general public. In principle, these names should provide an accessible way to engage with and identify species. The official common names of species have historically been labile without standard guidelines, even within a language. Currently, there is no systematic assessment of how often common names communicate identifiable and biologically relevant characteristics about species. This is a particular issue in ornithology, where common names are used more often than scientific names for species of birds in written and spoken English, even by professional researchers. To gain a better understanding of the types of terminology used in the common names of species and their frequency of use, we used a crowdsourcing approach and recruited a total of 85 professional ornithologists and non-professional participants to classify unique descriptors in the English common names of all recognized bird species from around the world. Each species' common name was assigned to one of ten categories associated with aspects of avian biology, ecology, or human culture. Across 10,906 species of birds, 89% had names describing the biology of the species, while the remaining 11% of species had names derived from human cultural references or local non-English languages. Species with common names based on features of avian biology were more likely to share an evolutionary history or be from the same geographic region, in comparison to species with common names derived from human culture. The crowdsourced data collection also revealed that many common names contained specialized or historic terminology unknown to many of the participants. As the first comprehensive assessment of the state of terminology in English common names of birds, the dataset sheds light on historical approaches to nomenclature and provides insight into how the general public currently engages with species through their names.","PeriodicalId":501575,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Zoology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.13.612884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Common names of species are important for communicating with the general public. In principle, these names should provide an accessible way to engage with and identify species. The official common names of species have historically been labile without standard guidelines, even within a language. Currently, there is no systematic assessment of how often common names communicate identifiable and biologically relevant characteristics about species. This is a particular issue in ornithology, where common names are used more often than scientific names for species of birds in written and spoken English, even by professional researchers. To gain a better understanding of the types of terminology used in the common names of species and their frequency of use, we used a crowdsourcing approach and recruited a total of 85 professional ornithologists and non-professional participants to classify unique descriptors in the English common names of all recognized bird species from around the world. Each species' common name was assigned to one of ten categories associated with aspects of avian biology, ecology, or human culture. Across 10,906 species of birds, 89% had names describing the biology of the species, while the remaining 11% of species had names derived from human cultural references or local non-English languages. Species with common names based on features of avian biology were more likely to share an evolutionary history or be from the same geographic region, in comparison to species with common names derived from human culture. The crowdsourced data collection also revealed that many common names contained specialized or historic terminology unknown to many of the participants. As the first comprehensive assessment of the state of terminology in English common names of birds, the dataset sheds light on historical approaches to nomenclature and provides insight into how the general public currently engages with species through their names.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鸟类命名竞赛:利用众包对英文鸟类名称进行分类
物种的通用名称对于与公众沟通非常重要。原则上,这些名称应能为人们提供一种接触和识别物种的便捷方式。物种的官方俗名历来易变,没有标准指南,即使在同一种语言中也是如此。目前,还没有系统地评估常用名称在多大程度上传达了物种的可识别性和生物相关特征。这在鸟类学中是一个特殊的问题,在鸟类物种的书面和口语英语中,即使是专业研究人员也更经常使用俗名而不是学名。为了更好地了解物种俗名中使用的术语类型及其使用频率,我们采用了众包方法,共招募了 85 位专业鸟类学家和非专业参与者,对全球所有公认鸟类物种英文俗名中的独特描述词进行分类。每个物种的俗名都被归入与鸟类生物学、生态学或人类文化相关的十个类别之一。在 10906 种鸟类中,89% 的鸟类名称描述了该物种的生物学特征,其余 11% 的鸟类名称来自人类文化或当地非英语语言。根据鸟类生物学特征命名的物种与根据人类文化命名的物种相比,更有可能具有共同的进化史或来自同一地理区域。众包数据收集还显示,许多俗名包含许多参与者不知道的专业或历史术语。作为首次对鸟类英文俗名中的术语状况进行的全面评估,该数据集揭示了历史上的命名方法,并让人们深入了解公众目前是如何通过名称与物种打交道的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bird Name-a-thon: Categorizing English bird names using crowdsourcing Nutritional analysis of commercially available, complete plant- and meat-based dry dog foods in the UK Trace Elements in Fish: Assessment of bioaccumulation and associated health risks. Effects of fasting on heat-stressed broiler chickens: part I- growth performance, meat quality, gut histomorphological and microbial responses Additions to the list of arthropods of Reunion Island
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1