Evaluation of deep learning based dose prediction in head and neck cancer patients using two different types of input contours

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1002/acm2.14519
Masahide Saito, Noriyuki Kadoya, Yuto Kimura, Hikaru Nemoto, Ryota Tozuka, Keiichi Jingu, Hiroshi Onishi
{"title":"Evaluation of deep learning based dose prediction in head and neck cancer patients using two different types of input contours","authors":"Masahide Saito, Noriyuki Kadoya, Yuto Kimura, Hikaru Nemoto, Ryota Tozuka, Keiichi Jingu, Hiroshi Onishi","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study evaluates deep learning (DL) based dose prediction methods in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients using two types of input contours.Materials and methodsSeventy‐five HNC patients undergoing two‐step volumetric‐modulated arc therapy were included. Dose prediction was performed using the AIVOT prototype (AiRato.Inc, Sendai, Japan), a commercial software with an HD U‐net‐based dose distribution prediction system. Models were developed for the initial plan (46 Gy/23Fr) and boost plan (24 Gy/12Fr), trained with 65 cases and tested with 10 cases. The 8‐channel model used one target (PTV) and seven organs at risk (OARs), while the 10‐channel model added two dummy contours (PTV ring and spinal cord PRV). Predicted and deliverable doses, obtained through dose mimicking on another radiation treatment planning system, were evaluated using dose‐volume indices for PTV and OARs.ResultsFor the initial plan, both models achieved approximately 2% prediction accuracy for the target dose and maintained accuracy within 3.2 Gy for OARs. The 10‐channel model outperformed the 8‐channel model for certain dose indices. For the boost plan, both models exhibited prediction accuracies of approximately 2% for the target dose and 1 Gy for OARs. The 10‐channel model showed significantly closer predictions to the ground truth for D50% and Dmean. Deliverable plans based on prediction doses showed little significant difference compared to the ground truth, especially for the boost plan.ConclusionDL‐based dose prediction using the AIVOT prototype software in HNC patients yielded promising results. While additional contours may enhance prediction accuracy, their impact on dose mimicking is relatively small.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study evaluates deep learning (DL) based dose prediction methods in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients using two types of input contours.Materials and methodsSeventy‐five HNC patients undergoing two‐step volumetric‐modulated arc therapy were included. Dose prediction was performed using the AIVOT prototype (AiRato.Inc, Sendai, Japan), a commercial software with an HD U‐net‐based dose distribution prediction system. Models were developed for the initial plan (46 Gy/23Fr) and boost plan (24 Gy/12Fr), trained with 65 cases and tested with 10 cases. The 8‐channel model used one target (PTV) and seven organs at risk (OARs), while the 10‐channel model added two dummy contours (PTV ring and spinal cord PRV). Predicted and deliverable doses, obtained through dose mimicking on another radiation treatment planning system, were evaluated using dose‐volume indices for PTV and OARs.ResultsFor the initial plan, both models achieved approximately 2% prediction accuracy for the target dose and maintained accuracy within 3.2 Gy for OARs. The 10‐channel model outperformed the 8‐channel model for certain dose indices. For the boost plan, both models exhibited prediction accuracies of approximately 2% for the target dose and 1 Gy for OARs. The 10‐channel model showed significantly closer predictions to the ground truth for D50% and Dmean. Deliverable plans based on prediction doses showed little significant difference compared to the ground truth, especially for the boost plan.ConclusionDL‐based dose prediction using the AIVOT prototype software in HNC patients yielded promising results. While additional contours may enhance prediction accuracy, their impact on dose mimicking is relatively small.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用两种不同类型的输入轮廓对基于深度学习的头颈癌患者剂量预测进行评估
本研究评估了基于深度学习(DL)的头颈癌(HNC)患者剂量预测方法,该方法使用了两种输入轮廓。剂量预测使用 AIVOT 原型(AiRato.Inc,日本仙台)进行,这是一款基于 HD U 网的剂量分布预测系统的商业软件。为初始计划(46 Gy/23Fr)和增强计划(24 Gy/12Fr)开发了模型,用 65 个病例进行了训练,并用 10 个病例进行了测试。8 通道模型使用一个目标(PTV)和七个危险器官(OAR),而 10 通道模型增加了两个假轮廓(PTV 环和脊髓 PRV)。结果在初始计划中,两个模型对靶区剂量的预测准确率都达到了约 2%,对 OAR 的预测准确率都保持在 3.2 Gy 以内。在某些剂量指数上,10 通道模型优于 8 通道模型。在增强计划中,两种模型对目标剂量的预测准确率均为约 2%,对 OAR 的预测准确率均为 1 Gy。10 通道模型对 D50% 和 Dmean 的预测明显更接近地面实况。基于预测剂量的可交付计划与地面实况相比差异不大,尤其是在提升计划方面。虽然附加轮廓可提高预测准确性,但其对剂量模拟的影响相对较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1