Security and Privacy Perspectives of People Living in Shared Home Environments

Nandita Pattnaik, Shujun Li, Jason R. C. Nurse
{"title":"Security and Privacy Perspectives of People Living in Shared Home Environments","authors":"Nandita Pattnaik, Shujun Li, Jason R. C. Nurse","doi":"arxiv-2409.09363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Security and privacy perspectives of people in a multi-user home are a\ngrowing area of research, with many researchers reflecting on the complicated\npower imbalance and challenging access control issues of the devices involved.\nHowever, these studies primarily focused on the multi-user scenarios in\ntraditional family home settings, leaving other types of multi-user home\nenvironments, such as homes shared by co-habitants without a familial\nrelationship, under-studied. This paper closes this research gap via\nquantitative and qualitative analysis of results from an online survey and\ncontent analysis of sampled online posts on Reddit. It explores the complex\nroles of shared home users, which depend on various factors unique to the\nshared home environment, e.g., who owns what home devices, how home devices are\nused by multiple users, and more complicated relationships between the landlord\nand people in the shared home and among co-habitants. Half (50.7%) of our\nsurvey participants thought that devices in a shared home are less secure than\nin a traditional family home. This perception was found statistically\nsignificantly associated with factors such as the fear of devices being\ntampered with in their absence and (lack of) trust in other co-habitants and\ntheir visitors. Our study revealed new user types and relationships in a\nmulti-user environment such as ExternalPrimary-InternalPrimary while analysing\nthe landlord and shared home resident relationship with regard to shared home\ndevice use. We propose a threat actor model for shared home environments, which\nhas a focus on possible malicious behaviours of current and past co-habitants\nof a shared home, as a special type of insider threat in a home environment. We\nalso recommend further research to understand the complex roles co-habitants\ncan play in navigating and adapting to a shared home environment's security and\nprivacy landscape.","PeriodicalId":501541,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Security and privacy perspectives of people in a multi-user home are a growing area of research, with many researchers reflecting on the complicated power imbalance and challenging access control issues of the devices involved. However, these studies primarily focused on the multi-user scenarios in traditional family home settings, leaving other types of multi-user home environments, such as homes shared by co-habitants without a familial relationship, under-studied. This paper closes this research gap via quantitative and qualitative analysis of results from an online survey and content analysis of sampled online posts on Reddit. It explores the complex roles of shared home users, which depend on various factors unique to the shared home environment, e.g., who owns what home devices, how home devices are used by multiple users, and more complicated relationships between the landlord and people in the shared home and among co-habitants. Half (50.7%) of our survey participants thought that devices in a shared home are less secure than in a traditional family home. This perception was found statistically significantly associated with factors such as the fear of devices being tampered with in their absence and (lack of) trust in other co-habitants and their visitors. Our study revealed new user types and relationships in a multi-user environment such as ExternalPrimary-InternalPrimary while analysing the landlord and shared home resident relationship with regard to shared home device use. We propose a threat actor model for shared home environments, which has a focus on possible malicious behaviours of current and past co-habitants of a shared home, as a special type of insider threat in a home environment. We also recommend further research to understand the complex roles co-habitants can play in navigating and adapting to a shared home environment's security and privacy landscape.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生活在共享家庭环境中的人们对安全和隐私的看法
多用户家庭中人们的安全和隐私视角是一个日益增长的研究领域,许多研究人员对复杂的权力不平衡和相关设备具有挑战性的访问控制问题进行了反思。然而,这些研究主要集中在传统家庭环境中的多用户场景,而对其他类型的多用户家庭环境,如没有家庭关系的共同居住者共享的家庭,研究不足。本文通过对一项在线调查的结果进行定量和定性分析,以及对 Reddit 上的在线帖子进行内容分析,填补了这一研究空白。本文探讨了合租家庭用户的复杂角色,这些角色取决于合租家庭环境的各种独特因素,例如,谁拥有哪些家庭设备、多个用户如何使用家庭设备、房东与合租家庭中的人之间以及共同居住者之间更复杂的关系。一半(50.7%)的调查参与者认为,与传统的家庭住宅相比,合租住宅中的设备安全性较低。在统计中发现,这种看法与担心设备在自己不在家时被篡改、对其他共同居住者及其访客(缺乏)信任等因素密切相关。我们的研究揭示了多用户环境中的新用户类型和关系,如外部主要用户-内部主要用户,同时分析了房东和合住者在合住设备使用方面的关系。我们提出了共享家庭环境的威胁行为者模型,重点关注共享家庭当前和过去共同居住者的可能恶意行为,将其视为家庭环境中的一种特殊内部威胁。我们还建议开展进一步研究,以了解共同居住者在导航和适应共享家庭环境的安全和隐私环境方面可能扮演的复杂角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Equimetrics -- Applying HAR principles to equestrian activities AI paintings vs. Human Paintings? Deciphering Public Interactions and Perceptions towards AI-Generated Paintings on TikTok From Data Stories to Dialogues: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Generative AI Agents and Data Storytelling in Enhancing Data Visualisation Comprehension Exploring Gaze Pattern in Autistic Children: Clustering, Visualization, and Prediction Revealing the Challenge of Detecting Character Knowledge Errors in LLM Role-Playing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1