Altered learning from positive feedback in adolescents with anorexia nervosa

IF 2.6 4区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1017/s1355617724000237
Blair Uniacke, Wouter van den Bos, Joseph Wonderlich, Jessica Ojeda, Jonathan Posner, Joanna E. Steinglass, Karin Foerde
{"title":"Altered learning from positive feedback in adolescents with anorexia nervosa","authors":"Blair Uniacke, Wouter van den Bos, Joseph Wonderlich, Jessica Ojeda, Jonathan Posner, Joanna E. Steinglass, Karin Foerde","doi":"10.1017/s1355617724000237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is characterized by severe restriction of calorie intake, which persists despite serious medical and psychological sequelae of starvation. Several prior studies have identified impaired feedback learning among individuals with AN, but whether it reflects a disturbance in learning from positive feedback (i.e., reward), negative feedback (i.e., punishment), or both, and the extent to which this impairment is related to severity and duration of illness, has not been clarified. Method: Participants were female adolescents with AN (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 76) and healthy teen volunteers (HC; <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 38) between the ages of 12–18 years who completed a probabilistic reinforcement learning task. A Bayesian reinforcement learning model was used to calculate separate learning rates for positive and negative feedback. Exploratory analyses examined associations between feedback learning and duration of illness, eating disorder severity, and self/parent reports of reward and punishment sensitivity. Results: Adolescents with AN had a significantly lower rate of learning from positive feedback relative to HC. Patients and HC did not differ in learning from negative feedback or on overall task performance measures. Feedback learning parameters were not significantly associated with duration of illness, eating disorder severity, or questionnaire-based reports of reward and punishment sensitivity. Conclusion: Adolescents with AN showed a circumscribed deficit in learning from reward that was not associated with duration of illness or reported sensitivity to reward or punishment. Subsequent longitudinal research should explore whether differences in learning from positive feedback relate to course of illness in youth with AN.","PeriodicalId":49995,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617724000237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is characterized by severe restriction of calorie intake, which persists despite serious medical and psychological sequelae of starvation. Several prior studies have identified impaired feedback learning among individuals with AN, but whether it reflects a disturbance in learning from positive feedback (i.e., reward), negative feedback (i.e., punishment), or both, and the extent to which this impairment is related to severity and duration of illness, has not been clarified. Method: Participants were female adolescents with AN (n = 76) and healthy teen volunteers (HC; n = 38) between the ages of 12–18 years who completed a probabilistic reinforcement learning task. A Bayesian reinforcement learning model was used to calculate separate learning rates for positive and negative feedback. Exploratory analyses examined associations between feedback learning and duration of illness, eating disorder severity, and self/parent reports of reward and punishment sensitivity. Results: Adolescents with AN had a significantly lower rate of learning from positive feedback relative to HC. Patients and HC did not differ in learning from negative feedback or on overall task performance measures. Feedback learning parameters were not significantly associated with duration of illness, eating disorder severity, or questionnaire-based reports of reward and punishment sensitivity. Conclusion: Adolescents with AN showed a circumscribed deficit in learning from reward that was not associated with duration of illness or reported sensitivity to reward or punishment. Subsequent longitudinal research should explore whether differences in learning from positive feedback relate to course of illness in youth with AN.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经性厌食症青少年从正反馈中学习的能力发生改变
目的:神经性厌食症(AN)的特点是严重限制卡路里摄入量,尽管饥饿会带来严重的医学和心理后遗症,但患者仍会持续厌食。之前的一些研究发现,神经性厌食症患者的反馈学习能力受损,但这是否反映了他们从正反馈(即奖励)、负反馈(即惩罚)或两者中学习的障碍,以及这种障碍在多大程度上与病情严重程度和病程长短有关,尚未得到澄清。研究方法参与者为患有自闭症的女性青少年(76人)和健康青少年志愿者(38人),年龄在12-18岁之间,完成一项概率强化学习任务。使用贝叶斯强化学习模型分别计算正反馈的学习率。探索性分析检验了反馈学习与病程、饮食失调严重程度以及自我/父母报告的奖惩敏感性之间的关联。结果显示青少年厌食症患者从积极反馈中学习的比率明显低于正常人。在负反馈学习或整体任务表现测量方面,患者与正常人没有差异。反馈学习参数与病程、进食障碍严重程度或基于问卷的奖惩敏感性报告无明显关联。结论患有自闭症的青少年在反馈学习方面表现出局限性的缺陷,这种缺陷与病程长短或报告的奖惩敏感性无关。后续的纵向研究应探讨从积极反馈中学习的差异是否与患有AN的青少年的病程有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
185
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society is the official journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, an organization of over 4,500 international members from a variety of disciplines. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society welcomes original, creative, high quality research papers covering all areas of neuropsychology. The focus of articles may be primarily experimental, applied, or clinical. Contributions will broadly reflect the interest of all areas of neuropsychology, including but not limited to: development of cognitive processes, brain-behavior relationships, adult and pediatric neuropsychology, neurobehavioral syndromes (such as aphasia or apraxia), and the interfaces of neuropsychology with related areas such as behavioral neurology, neuropsychiatry, genetics, and cognitive neuroscience. Papers that utilize behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological measures are appropriate. To assure maximum flexibility and to promote diverse mechanisms of scholarly communication, the following formats are available in addition to a Regular Research Article: Brief Communication is a shorter research article; Rapid Communication is intended for "fast breaking" new work that does not yet justify a full length article and is placed on a fast review track; Case Report is a theoretically important and unique case study; Critical Review and Short Review are thoughtful considerations of topics of importance to neuropsychology and include meta-analyses; Dialogue provides a forum for publishing two distinct positions on controversial issues in a point-counterpoint format; Special Issue and Special Section consist of several articles linked thematically; Letter to the Editor responds to recent articles published in the Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society; and Book Review, which is considered but is no longer solicited.
期刊最新文献
Adherence to high-frequency ecological momentary assessment in persons with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. The Grenada Learning and Memory Scale: Psychometric features and normative data in Caribbean preschool children. Beyond brain injury: Examining the neuropsychological and psychosocial sequelae of post-traumatic epilepsy. Psychometric and adherence considerations for high-frequency, smartphone-based cognitive screening protocols in older adults. Comparing and linking the Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1