'Ancestral future': On consumption, ethics and the Anthropocene

IF 3 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS Futures Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2024.103478
Isleide Arruda Fontenelle
{"title":"'Ancestral future': On consumption, ethics and the Anthropocene","authors":"Isleide Arruda Fontenelle","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2024.103478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Along with a growing debate around the emergence of a new time on Earth, called the Anthropocene, a critical perspective has emerged in the field of Human and Social Sciences that questions the terms of this nomination, including its temporality, its view of humanity as species, its capitalist impetus and its colonialist position. In this essay, I seek to materialize this critical view by analysing how corporate discourse has promoted \"ethical solutions\" for the Anthropocene, particularly in the sphere of consumption. Taking <em>The Fable of the Bees of</em> Bernard Mandeville as a starting point, I show that in the context of capitalism, consumption is based on the logic of excess and the promise of unlimited satisfaction, which is opposed to what the time of catastrophes demands. In dialogue with a prolific interdisciplinary academic production on another way of understanding the Anthropocene, I argue that it is not possible to think about an ethical consumption in the Anthropocene. I propose a return to the ancestral future of Indigenous peoples as a means to envision another ethics, one in which the critique of consumption does not evolve into an implicit endorsement of it or its future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328724001617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Along with a growing debate around the emergence of a new time on Earth, called the Anthropocene, a critical perspective has emerged in the field of Human and Social Sciences that questions the terms of this nomination, including its temporality, its view of humanity as species, its capitalist impetus and its colonialist position. In this essay, I seek to materialize this critical view by analysing how corporate discourse has promoted "ethical solutions" for the Anthropocene, particularly in the sphere of consumption. Taking The Fable of the Bees of Bernard Mandeville as a starting point, I show that in the context of capitalism, consumption is based on the logic of excess and the promise of unlimited satisfaction, which is opposed to what the time of catastrophes demands. In dialogue with a prolific interdisciplinary academic production on another way of understanding the Anthropocene, I argue that it is not possible to think about an ethical consumption in the Anthropocene. I propose a return to the ancestral future of Indigenous peoples as a means to envision another ethics, one in which the critique of consumption does not evolve into an implicit endorsement of it or its future.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
祖先的未来":关于消费、伦理和人类世
随着围绕地球上出现了一个新时代--"人类世"--的讨论日益增多,在人文和社会科学领域出现了一种批判性观点,质疑这一提名的条件,包括其时间性、对人类作为物种的看法、其资本主义推动力及其殖民主义立场。在这篇文章中,我试图通过分析企业话语如何促进人类世的 "伦理解决方案",特别是在消费领域,来具体落实这一批判性观点。我以伯纳德-曼德维尔的《蜜蜂寓言》为出发点,说明在资本主义背景下,消费是基于过剩的逻辑和无限满足的承诺,这与灾难时代的要求是相对立的。通过与另一种理解 "人类世 "的多产跨学科学术成果进行对话,我认为不可能在 "人类世 "中思考道德消费。我建议回到土著人民祖先的未来,以此来设想另一种伦理,在这种伦理中,对消费的批判不会演变成对消费或其未来的默许。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Futures
Futures Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures
期刊最新文献
The politics of transdisciplinary research on societal transitions Narratives, expectations, and policy criteria for a democratic and socially engaging energy transition Exploring urban novel ecosystems: Understandings, insights and recommendations for future research and practice Future cities' theories for sustainable future: A systematic literature review Planetary scale climatic change through bioengineering the microbial world. A technofix imaginary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1