Sharma's risk assessment score as a decision making tool to decide between total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty as a treatment option for elderly patients with fracture neck of femur. A prospective observational study

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2024.08.009
Mrinal Sharma
{"title":"Sharma's risk assessment score as a decision making tool to decide between total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty as a treatment option for elderly patients with fracture neck of femur. A prospective observational study","authors":"Mrinal Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The decision to do a total hip arthroplasty (THA) or a hemiarthroplasty (HA) in an elderly with a fracture neck of femur (FNOF) is commonly based upon the surgeon's preference, pre-anesthetic fitness, hospital setup, and intensive care backup. The author devised a Sharma's risk assessment score (SRAS), based upon all the common factors that affect the surgical outcomes following FNOF in the elderly, to help orthopedic surgeons decide between THA or HA as a treatment for FNOF.</p></div><div><h3>Material &amp; methods</h3><p>It was a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary-level institute. SRAS is based upon 10 parameters with each parameter having a max score of 4 and a minimum score of 1. So the maximum score a patient can score is 40 and the minimum a patient can score is 10. It was hypothesized that a patient with FNOF with a preop SRAS score &gt;20 if subjected to a (HA) and a patient with a preop SRAS score ≤ 20 if subjected to a (THA) would have better outcomes and low complication rates. Out of Eighty-eight patients with FNOF, 7 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 81 patients with FNOF were prospectively followed between May 2018 and May 2022 and segregated into two groups THA (n = 47) and HA(n = 34) based on the SRAS.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average length of follow-up was 2.6 years (6 months–4 years). The average SRAS was an average 25.7(21–32) in the HA group and 16.2 (11–20) in the THA group. Complications were seen in 12.7 % of the THA group and 17.6 % of the HA group. We had a 2.1 % 90-day mortality in the THA group and a 2.9 % 90-day mortality in the HA group. One year mortality in THA was 2.1 % and it was increased to 5.8 % in the HA group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>SRAS is a useful decision-making tool that would guide surgeons to decide between THA or HA as a treatment option for elderly FNOF and would help minimize post-operative complications and reduce mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Level 3 study</h3><p>Prospective observational study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X24002976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The decision to do a total hip arthroplasty (THA) or a hemiarthroplasty (HA) in an elderly with a fracture neck of femur (FNOF) is commonly based upon the surgeon's preference, pre-anesthetic fitness, hospital setup, and intensive care backup. The author devised a Sharma's risk assessment score (SRAS), based upon all the common factors that affect the surgical outcomes following FNOF in the elderly, to help orthopedic surgeons decide between THA or HA as a treatment for FNOF.

Material & methods

It was a prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary-level institute. SRAS is based upon 10 parameters with each parameter having a max score of 4 and a minimum score of 1. So the maximum score a patient can score is 40 and the minimum a patient can score is 10. It was hypothesized that a patient with FNOF with a preop SRAS score >20 if subjected to a (HA) and a patient with a preop SRAS score ≤ 20 if subjected to a (THA) would have better outcomes and low complication rates. Out of Eighty-eight patients with FNOF, 7 were lost to follow-up. The remaining 81 patients with FNOF were prospectively followed between May 2018 and May 2022 and segregated into two groups THA (n = 47) and HA(n = 34) based on the SRAS.

Results

The average length of follow-up was 2.6 years (6 months–4 years). The average SRAS was an average 25.7(21–32) in the HA group and 16.2 (11–20) in the THA group. Complications were seen in 12.7 % of the THA group and 17.6 % of the HA group. We had a 2.1 % 90-day mortality in the THA group and a 2.9 % 90-day mortality in the HA group. One year mortality in THA was 2.1 % and it was increased to 5.8 % in the HA group.

Conclusion

SRAS is a useful decision-making tool that would guide surgeons to decide between THA or HA as a treatment option for elderly FNOF and would help minimize post-operative complications and reduce mortality.

Level 3 study

Prospective observational study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
夏尔马风险评估评分作为一种决策工具,用于决定股骨颈骨折老年患者选择全髋关节置换术还是半髋关节置换术。前瞻性观察研究
目的 对于股骨颈骨折(FNOF)的老年人,决定进行全髋关节置换术(THA)还是半髋关节置换术(HA)通常取决于外科医生的偏好、麻醉前的身体状况、医院设置和重症监护后备人员。作者根据影响老年人股骨颈骨折术后手术效果的所有常见因素,设计了沙马风险评估评分(SRAS),以帮助骨科医生决定采用 THA 还是 HA 作为治疗股骨颈骨折的方法。SRAS 基于 10 个参数,每个参数的最高分是 4 分,最低分是 1 分,因此患者的最高分是 40 分,最低分是 10 分。根据假设,如果 FNOF 患者术前 SRAS 评分为 20 分,则采用(HA)手术;如果采用(THA)手术,则术前 SRAS 评分≤20 分的患者将获得更好的治疗效果,并发症发生率也会更低。在 88 位 FNOF 患者中,有 7 位失去了随访机会。在2018年5月至2022年5月期间,对剩余的81名FNOF患者进行了前瞻性随访,并根据SRAS将其分为THA(47人)和HA(34人)两组。HA组的平均SRAS为25.7(21-32),THA组为16.2(11-20)。并发症在 THA 组中占 12.7%,在 HA 组中占 17.6%。THA 组 90 天死亡率为 2.1%,HA 组 90 天死亡率为 2.9%。结论SRAS是一种有用的决策工具,可指导外科医生决定采用THA还是HA作为老年FNOF的治疗方案,并有助于最大限度地减少术后并发症和降低死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
期刊最新文献
The short-term outcomes of cementless collared triple-tapered stem for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients ≥70-years old Anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing inpatient total knee arthroplasty: A matched analysis Effect of vehicular vibrations on L-4 lumbar vertebrae – A finite element study Hidden costs of first choice alternatives: A financial model of thromboprophylaxis and prosthetic joint infection prophylaxis in total knee arthroplasty Is limb overcorrection following total knee arthroplasty compromising functional outcome?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1