The impact of descriptor identicalness on investors' judgements of managers’ opportunistic estimation choices

IF 3.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Accounting Organizations and Society Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.aos.2024.101575
{"title":"The impact of descriptor identicalness on investors' judgements of managers’ opportunistic estimation choices","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.aos.2024.101575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We conduct two experiments to examine how descriptor identicalness influences investors' assessments of managers' opportunistic estimation choices. We manipulate the identicalness of descriptors (<em>identical</em> versus <em>non-identical</em>) and managers' opportunistic estimation choices (<em>more</em> versus <em>less opportunistic</em>). We find that investors are better able to integrate information when managers use identical descriptors in their disclosures than when managers use non-identical descriptors. We also find that investors who observe identical descriptors tend to make <em>less</em> favorable investment judgments when managers' estimation choices are more (versus less) opportunistic, whereas those presented with non-identical descriptors are less likely to discern between more and less opportunistic estimation choices. Lastly, our supplemental analyses indicate that descriptor identicalness facilitates information integration, which in turn moderates the impact of managers' estimation choices on investors’ credibility assessments and subsequent investment judgments. Our findings have important implications for regulators, managers, and investors, shedding light on how investors use and incorporate accounting disclosures into their investment decision-making processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48379,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Organizations and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Organizations and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368224000357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We conduct two experiments to examine how descriptor identicalness influences investors' assessments of managers' opportunistic estimation choices. We manipulate the identicalness of descriptors (identical versus non-identical) and managers' opportunistic estimation choices (more versus less opportunistic). We find that investors are better able to integrate information when managers use identical descriptors in their disclosures than when managers use non-identical descriptors. We also find that investors who observe identical descriptors tend to make less favorable investment judgments when managers' estimation choices are more (versus less) opportunistic, whereas those presented with non-identical descriptors are less likely to discern between more and less opportunistic estimation choices. Lastly, our supplemental analyses indicate that descriptor identicalness facilitates information integration, which in turn moderates the impact of managers' estimation choices on investors’ credibility assessments and subsequent investment judgments. Our findings have important implications for regulators, managers, and investors, shedding light on how investors use and incorporate accounting disclosures into their investment decision-making processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
描述符相同性对投资者判断管理者机会主义估算选择的影响
我们进行了两项实验,研究描述符的相同性如何影响投资者对经理人机会主义估计选择的评估。我们操纵了描述符的相同性(相同与不相同)和经理人的机会主义估计选择(更多机会主义与更少机会主义)。我们发现,与经理人使用非相同描述符相比,经理人在披露信息时使用相同描述符时,投资者能更好地整合信息。我们还发现,当经理人的机会主义估计选择较多(相对较少)时,观察到相同描述符的投资者倾向于做出较不利的投资判断,而观察到非相同描述符的投资者则较难分辨机会主义估计选择较多还是较少。最后,我们的补充分析表明,描述符的相同性有利于信息整合,而信息整合反过来又会调节管理者的估计选择对投资者的可信度评估和后续投资判断的影响。我们的研究结果对监管者、管理者和投资者都有重要意义,揭示了投资者如何使用会计信息披露并将其纳入投资决策过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Accounting, Organizations & Society is a major international journal concerned with all aspects of the relationship between accounting and human behaviour, organizational structures and processes, and the changing social and political environment of the enterprise.
期刊最新文献
What you are versus what you do: The effect of noun-verb framing in earnings conference calls Seeking justice: Inequitable management compensation and employee whistleblowing The impact of descriptor identicalness on investors' judgements of managers’ opportunistic estimation choices Bringing morality back in: Accounting as moral interlocutor in reflective equilibrium processes Accounting and the shifting spheres: The economic, the public, the planet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1