Open conversations: Finding ways to improve communication between family forest landowners and consulting foresters

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY Trees, Forests and People Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100681
Jace McCauley, Adam Maggard, Rebecca Barlow, John Kush
{"title":"Open conversations: Finding ways to improve communication between family forest landowners and consulting foresters","authors":"Jace McCauley,&nbsp;Adam Maggard,&nbsp;Rebecca Barlow,&nbsp;John Kush","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Alabama is comprised of 23 million acres of forestland, of which family forest landowners (FFLs) own 56 % of that acreage. Therefore, FFLs are vital to maintaining the quality and diversity of Alabama's forests. However, FFLs possess varying attitudes towards management, value their land for different reasons, and have differing management objectives. In addition, FFLs are comprised of diverse backgrounds, own vastly different acreages, and fall within differing income brackets, all of which have been shown to affect management usage. This research aims to assess consulting foresters and FFLs in Alabama to learn why FFLs are hesitant to use consulting foresters for land management. It also aims to educate FFLs and consulting foresters in Alabama on better communicating their needs, services, and benefits. To study these two groups, a set of interviews and two surveys were used to collect perceptions, experiences, and needs. While consulting foresters are willing to work with smaller acreage, there are still constraints preventing management, and cost was mentioned by both groups. Still, FFLs are interested in consulting foresters' services, but many do not actively market FFLs. As a result, FFLs are unaware of the different types of forestry professionals, causing competition for consulting foresters who must be registered. Both consulting foresters and FFLs need to become more active in organizations, and consulting foresters need to adopt newer marketing techniques, while FFLs should seek more educational opportunities and opportunities to interact with consulting foresters directly.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100681"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001882/pdfft?md5=e823f32200a2496ef8046cb8e3fb3773&pid=1-s2.0-S2666719324001882-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324001882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alabama is comprised of 23 million acres of forestland, of which family forest landowners (FFLs) own 56 % of that acreage. Therefore, FFLs are vital to maintaining the quality and diversity of Alabama's forests. However, FFLs possess varying attitudes towards management, value their land for different reasons, and have differing management objectives. In addition, FFLs are comprised of diverse backgrounds, own vastly different acreages, and fall within differing income brackets, all of which have been shown to affect management usage. This research aims to assess consulting foresters and FFLs in Alabama to learn why FFLs are hesitant to use consulting foresters for land management. It also aims to educate FFLs and consulting foresters in Alabama on better communicating their needs, services, and benefits. To study these two groups, a set of interviews and two surveys were used to collect perceptions, experiences, and needs. While consulting foresters are willing to work with smaller acreage, there are still constraints preventing management, and cost was mentioned by both groups. Still, FFLs are interested in consulting foresters' services, but many do not actively market FFLs. As a result, FFLs are unaware of the different types of forestry professionals, causing competition for consulting foresters who must be registered. Both consulting foresters and FFLs need to become more active in organizations, and consulting foresters need to adopt newer marketing techniques, while FFLs should seek more educational opportunities and opportunities to interact with consulting foresters directly.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放式对话:想方设法改善家庭林地所有者与林业顾问之间的沟通
阿拉巴马州有 2,300 万英亩林地,其中家庭林地所有者 (FFL) 拥有 56% 的林地。因此,家庭林地所有者对保持阿拉巴马州森林的质量和多样性至关重要。然而,家庭林地所有者对管理的态度各不相同,他们出于不同的原因珍视自己的土地,并有着不同的管理目标。此外,FFLs 的背景各不相同,拥有的土地面积也大相径庭,属于不同的收入阶层,所有这些都被证明会影响管理的使用。本研究旨在评估阿拉巴马州的林业咨询顾问和林业基金,以了解林业基金为何不愿使用林业咨询顾问进行土地管理。本研究还旨在教育阿拉巴马州的森林经营者和咨询林务人员更好地沟通他们的需求、服务和利益。为了研究这两个群体,我们使用了一组访谈和两份调查来收集看法、经验和需求。虽然林业咨询人员愿意与面积较小的林地合作,但仍有一些限制因素阻碍了管理,两个群体都提到了成本问题。尽管如此,家庭林场仍然对林业咨询公司的服务感兴趣,但许多家庭林场并不积极推销家庭林场。因此,家庭林场并不了解不同类型的林业专业人员,造成了对必须注册的森林咨询师的竞争。咨询林务师和家庭林场都需要在组织中变得更加活跃,咨询林务师需要采用更新的营销技术,而家庭林场则应寻求更多的教育机会和与咨询林务师直接互动的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Impact of prescribed fire on fungal communities in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) forests in Mediterranean transitional zones Integrating public perception and quantitative metrics for improved urban park planning in Isfahan, Iran Effectiveness, efficiency, and equity in jurisdictional REDD+ benefit distribution mechanisms: Insights from Jambi province, Indonesia Property estimation, landowner perspectives and timber valuation of heirs property in North Carolina Challenges in harvesting and utilization of Ziziphus tree fruits in Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1