{"title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery for hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized control trials","authors":"Wen Zhou , Shiying Chu , Yuan Zhou , Yongjing Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus traditional care in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were acquired via a comprehensive search of multiple databases. A meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.4 software to calculate effect sizes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This meta-analysis included 850 patients in the ERAS group and 845 patients in the control group (patients who received traditional care). The outcomes suggested no significant difference in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, visual analogue scale, 30-day readmission rate, and mortality rate between the two groups. However, the ERAS group was associated with a significant decrease in transfusion rate, hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications. Moreover, the ERAS group had higher Hospital for Special Surgery scores and satisfaction rates.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients who underwent THA and TKA would benefit more from ERAS than traditional care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56258,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Nursing","volume":"60 ","pages":"Pages 249-257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197457224002441","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) versus traditional care in patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
Methods
All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were acquired via a comprehensive search of multiple databases. A meta-analysis was performed using Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.4 software to calculate effect sizes.
Results
This meta-analysis included 850 patients in the ERAS group and 845 patients in the control group (patients who received traditional care). The outcomes suggested no significant difference in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, visual analogue scale, 30-day readmission rate, and mortality rate between the two groups. However, the ERAS group was associated with a significant decrease in transfusion rate, hospital length of stay, and postoperative complications. Moreover, the ERAS group had higher Hospital for Special Surgery scores and satisfaction rates.
Conclusions
Patients who underwent THA and TKA would benefit more from ERAS than traditional care.
期刊介绍：
Geriatric Nursing is a comprehensive source for clinical information and management advice relating to the care of older adults. The journal''s peer-reviewed articles report the latest developments in the management of acute and chronic disorders and provide practical advice on care of older adults across the long term continuum. Geriatric Nursing addresses current issues related to drugs, advance directives, staff development and management, legal issues, client and caregiver education, infection control, and other topics. The journal is written specifically for nurses and nurse practitioners who work with older adults in any care setting.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
