The stricter the better? The impact of early teacher grading standards on students’ competences development and academic track enrollment

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Social Science Research Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103085
Ilaria Lievore , Emanuele Fedeli , Moris Triventi
{"title":"The stricter the better? The impact of early teacher grading standards on students’ competences development and academic track enrollment","authors":"Ilaria Lievore ,&nbsp;Emanuele Fedeli ,&nbsp;Moris Triventi","doi":"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2024.103085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the growing attention on teachers' grading practices in educational research, less attention has been dedicated to understanding the consequences of teachers' grading standards, especially in early stages of their scholastic career, on later students' educational outcomes. This paper aims at filling this gap, analyzing the impact of teacher's severity in grading on students' competences development and academic track enrollment, and how it varies according to students' gender and socio-economic background. The analysis relies on Italian INVALSI-SNV data: information on 5th graders and their teachers are linked, and pupils are followed up to 8th and 10th grade, in which their competences and school track are recorded. Results show that being exposed to stricter grading in 5th grade leads to higher students' competences later, and to higher probability to enroll in the most prestigious academic track, with no notable heterogeneous effects across students with different sociodemographic characteristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48338,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Research","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 103085"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X24001078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the growing attention on teachers' grading practices in educational research, less attention has been dedicated to understanding the consequences of teachers' grading standards, especially in early stages of their scholastic career, on later students' educational outcomes. This paper aims at filling this gap, analyzing the impact of teacher's severity in grading on students' competences development and academic track enrollment, and how it varies according to students' gender and socio-economic background. The analysis relies on Italian INVALSI-SNV data: information on 5th graders and their teachers are linked, and pupils are followed up to 8th and 10th grade, in which their competences and school track are recorded. Results show that being exposed to stricter grading in 5th grade leads to higher students' competences later, and to higher probability to enroll in the most prestigious academic track, with no notable heterogeneous effects across students with different sociodemographic characteristics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
越严格越好?早期教师评分标准对学生能力发展和升学的影响
尽管教育研究中对教师评分做法的关注与日俱增,但却较少关注教师评分标准对学生日后教育成果的影响,尤其是在学业生涯的早期阶段。本文旨在填补这一空白,分析教师评分的严格程度对学生能力发展和学业成绩的影响,以及这种影响因学生的性别和社会经济背景而异。分析依据的是意大利 INVALSI-SNV 数据:五年级学生及其教师的信息被链接起来,学生被跟踪到八年级和十年级,在这两个年级,他们的能力和学业轨迹被记录下来。结果表明,在五年级时接受更严格的分级会提高学生日后的能力,并提高进入最负盛名的学业轨道的概率,但对具有不同社会人口特征的学生没有明显的异质性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Social Science Research publishes papers devoted to quantitative social science research and methodology. The journal features articles that illustrate the use of quantitative methods in the empirical solution of substantive problems, and emphasizes those concerned with issues or methods that cut across traditional disciplinary lines. Special attention is given to methods that have been used by only one particular social science discipline, but that may have application to a broader range of areas.
期刊最新文献
Do minority inclusive institutions increase electoral support for radical-right parties? Educational assortative mating and couples’ linked occupational trajectories in China Gender bias in evaluating assistant professorship applicants? Evidence from harmonized survey experiments in Germany and Italy Impact of layoffs on mortality and physical health in transitional China 1989–2015 Political and educational dynamics behind the Evangelicals’ stance against mask mandates during COVID-19 in the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1