How does perceived overqualification beget workplace incivility? A moderated mediation model based on Kahn’s framework

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2024-09-21 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114961
Pei Liu , Yuting Mu , Xin Li
{"title":"How does perceived overqualification beget workplace incivility? A moderated mediation model based on Kahn’s framework","authors":"Pei Liu ,&nbsp;Yuting Mu ,&nbsp;Xin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We introduce a comprehensive framework to investigate the influence of perceived overqualification (POQ) on workplace incivility. Building upon Kahn’s theoretical framework for engagement, our study proposes that POQ hinders the fulfillment of three psychological conditions—specifically, psychological meaningfulness, psychological safety, and emotional exhaustion—thereby impacting the emergence of instigated incivility in the workplace. Moreover, we hypothesize varying contributions of these psychological conditions in elucidating the relationship between POQ and instigated incivility. Notably, psychological menaingfulness and emotional exhaustion are likely to provide more substantial explanations for POQ-incivility relation. Additionally, we posit that ethical leadership plays a pivotal role in mitigating the detrimental effects of POQ on instigated incivility. Through the implementation of two multi-wave and multi-level field studies, along with an experiment, our hypotheses were supported. This research not only advances the theoretical comprehension of POQ but also carries substantial implications for addressing both POQ and workplace incivility.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 114961"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632400465X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We introduce a comprehensive framework to investigate the influence of perceived overqualification (POQ) on workplace incivility. Building upon Kahn’s theoretical framework for engagement, our study proposes that POQ hinders the fulfillment of three psychological conditions—specifically, psychological meaningfulness, psychological safety, and emotional exhaustion—thereby impacting the emergence of instigated incivility in the workplace. Moreover, we hypothesize varying contributions of these psychological conditions in elucidating the relationship between POQ and instigated incivility. Notably, psychological menaingfulness and emotional exhaustion are likely to provide more substantial explanations for POQ-incivility relation. Additionally, we posit that ethical leadership plays a pivotal role in mitigating the detrimental effects of POQ on instigated incivility. Through the implementation of two multi-wave and multi-level field studies, along with an experiment, our hypotheses were supported. This research not only advances the theoretical comprehension of POQ but also carries substantial implications for addressing both POQ and workplace incivility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过高的资历如何导致工作场所的不文明现象?基于卡恩框架的调节中介模型
我们引入了一个综合框架来研究感知过高资质(POQ)对工作场所不文明行为的影响。在卡恩的参与理论框架基础上,我们的研究提出,POQ 会阻碍三个心理条件的实现,即心理意义、心理安全和情感衰竭,从而影响工作场所煽动性不礼貌行为的出现。此外,我们还假设这些心理条件在阐明 POQ 与煽动性不文明行为之间的关系时会起到不同的作用。值得注意的是,心理创伤和情绪衰竭可能会对 POQ 与不礼貌行为之间的关系提供更实质性的解释。此外,我们还认为,道德领导力在减轻 POQ 对煽动性不文明行为的不利影响方面发挥着关键作用。通过实施两项多波段、多层次的实地研究以及一项实验,我们的假设得到了支持。这项研究不仅推进了对 POQ 的理论理解,而且对解决 POQ 和工作场所不文明现象具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Content dissimilarity and online review helpfulness: Contextual insights Editorial Board Preventing algorithm aversion: People are willing to use algorithms with a learning label Agility in marketing teams: An analysis of factors influencing the entry decision into a trendy social network Socio-politically silent brands: A double edged sword
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1