Framing behaviour change for sustainable agriculture: Themes, approaches, and future directions

Kingsley Ofosu-Ampong , Wuletawu Abera , Anna Müller , Samuel Adjei-Nsiah , Richard Boateng , Bryan Acheampong
{"title":"Framing behaviour change for sustainable agriculture: Themes, approaches, and future directions","authors":"Kingsley Ofosu-Ampong ,&nbsp;Wuletawu Abera ,&nbsp;Anna Müller ,&nbsp;Samuel Adjei-Nsiah ,&nbsp;Richard Boateng ,&nbsp;Bryan Acheampong","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2024.100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the growing demand for behaviour change research and the benefit of understanding how human behaviour influences use cases and the adoption of agricultural innovations, research on how behaviour change occurs and the state of knowledge in the field remains scarce. To address this concern, this study conducted a systematic literature review of behaviour change in sustainable agriculture between 2015 and 2024. Our search identified 568 studies. After careful evaluation, 74 primary studies were selected and analysed to synthesize key themes relevant to our research objectives. Findings point to four promising approaches (innovative, empowerment, historical and knowledge co-creation, and structural and systemic) that can effectively address the complex challenges and promote sustainability in behaviour change agriculture. By emphasizing long-term solutions and empowering farmers to make informed decisions, these approaches contribute to improved environmental health, increased farm economic profitability, and enhanced social equity and well-being for farmers. Further, we found socio-economic factors and environmental conditions as two key determinants that affect the adoption of sustainable agriculture practices. Thus, adoption of sustainable practices is influenced by a combination of factors, rather than any single variable behaviour and the implication of these factors can vary significantly across different regions and cultural contexts. Our analysis makes important contributions, namely, (i) defining behaviour change in sustainable agriculture, (ii) approaches on how behaviour change can occur, and (iii) model development on sustainable agriculture behaviour change. The study provides practical implications for government agencies, agricultural extension services, research institutions and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to identify specific behaviours that contribute to food insecurity and unsustainable agriculture practices. Such knowledge can help the creation of targeted interventions that address the root causes of these problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911924000534/pdfft?md5=042d407054aa7cde458fc1e4b408ff21&pid=1-s2.0-S2949911924000534-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911924000534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the growing demand for behaviour change research and the benefit of understanding how human behaviour influences use cases and the adoption of agricultural innovations, research on how behaviour change occurs and the state of knowledge in the field remains scarce. To address this concern, this study conducted a systematic literature review of behaviour change in sustainable agriculture between 2015 and 2024. Our search identified 568 studies. After careful evaluation, 74 primary studies were selected and analysed to synthesize key themes relevant to our research objectives. Findings point to four promising approaches (innovative, empowerment, historical and knowledge co-creation, and structural and systemic) that can effectively address the complex challenges and promote sustainability in behaviour change agriculture. By emphasizing long-term solutions and empowering farmers to make informed decisions, these approaches contribute to improved environmental health, increased farm economic profitability, and enhanced social equity and well-being for farmers. Further, we found socio-economic factors and environmental conditions as two key determinants that affect the adoption of sustainable agriculture practices. Thus, adoption of sustainable practices is influenced by a combination of factors, rather than any single variable behaviour and the implication of these factors can vary significantly across different regions and cultural contexts. Our analysis makes important contributions, namely, (i) defining behaviour change in sustainable agriculture, (ii) approaches on how behaviour change can occur, and (iii) model development on sustainable agriculture behaviour change. The study provides practical implications for government agencies, agricultural extension services, research institutions and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to identify specific behaviours that contribute to food insecurity and unsustainable agriculture practices. Such knowledge can help the creation of targeted interventions that address the root causes of these problems.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为可持续农业的行为改变制定框架:主题、方法和未来方向
尽管对行为变化研究的需求日益增长,了解人类行为如何影响使用案例和农业创新的采用也大有裨益,但有关行为变化如何发生以及该领域知识现状的研究仍然很少。为了解决这一问题,本研究对 2015 年至 2024 年期间可持续农业中的行为变化进行了系统的文献综述。我们的搜索确定了 568 项研究。经过仔细评估,我们选择并分析了 74 项主要研究,以归纳与我们的研究目标相关的关键主题。研究结果表明,四种有前途的方法(创新、赋权、历史与知识共创、结构与系统)可以有效应对复杂的挑战,促进行为改变农业的可持续性。通过强调长期解决方案和增强农民做出明智决策的能力,这些方法有助于改善环境健康、提高农业经济收益、增强社会公平和农民福祉。此外,我们发现社会经济因素和环境条件是影响采用可持续农业做法的两个关键决定因素。因此,可持续实践的采用受到多种因素的综合影响,而不是任何单一变量行为的影响,而且这些因素的影响在不同地区和文化背景下会有很大差异。我们的分析做出了重要贡献,即:(i) 界定可持续农业的行为变化;(ii) 行为变化的发生方式;(iii) 可持续农业行为变化模型的开发。这项研究为政府机构、农业推广服务机构、研究机构和非政府组织(NGOs)确定导致粮食不安全和不可持续农业做法的具体行为提供了实际意义。这些知识有助于制定有针对性的干预措施,从根本上解决这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated farming system-A means of improving farmers’ well-being in the wetland ecosystem of Bangladesh Analyzing the rainfed wheat yield gap in Northwest Iran Are bacterial communities and aggregation in fragile soils influenced by the management system? Framing behaviour change for sustainable agriculture: Themes, approaches, and future directions Does climate-smart agriculture technology improve farmers' subjective well-being? Micro-level evidence from Odisha, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1