{"title":"CBDC and banking stability: Modeling cascading effects on reserves, lending, and liquidity","authors":"Gilles Brice M'bakob , Anatole Tchounga","doi":"10.1016/j.rie.2024.101005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research uses a dynamic modelling approach to design and simulate an equilibrium model of the interaction between CBDC issuance, deposits and bank reserves. With many central banks announcing their intention to issue central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), it has become imperative to rigorously analyse the potential impact of these issues on the banking system. This study aims to examine the implications of the introduction of CBDCs within a robust analytical framework, in order to inform policymakers and financial sector players about the possible consequences of this major monetary innovation. The study results show that overconfidence of economic agents towards CBDCs can drastically reduce bank reserves, thereby limiting the lending capacity of banks and creating liquidity problems. Similarly, increasing reserve requirements in fiat currency for each unit of CBDC issued can constrain bank reserves and restrict loans and deposits. Additionally, a rise in interest rates on CBDC-related loans can discourage borrowers, thereby reducing loan demand and affecting banking activity. An increase in interest rates leads to a decrease in the quantity of CBDC in circulation, an increase in bank reserves and deposits in CBDC, and a decrease in bank loans. Monitoring the level of confidence of economic agents towards CBDCs is crucial to avoid excessive speculation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46094,"journal":{"name":"Research in Economics","volume":"78 4","pages":"Article 101005"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944324000693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research uses a dynamic modelling approach to design and simulate an equilibrium model of the interaction between CBDC issuance, deposits and bank reserves. With many central banks announcing their intention to issue central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), it has become imperative to rigorously analyse the potential impact of these issues on the banking system. This study aims to examine the implications of the introduction of CBDCs within a robust analytical framework, in order to inform policymakers and financial sector players about the possible consequences of this major monetary innovation. The study results show that overconfidence of economic agents towards CBDCs can drastically reduce bank reserves, thereby limiting the lending capacity of banks and creating liquidity problems. Similarly, increasing reserve requirements in fiat currency for each unit of CBDC issued can constrain bank reserves and restrict loans and deposits. Additionally, a rise in interest rates on CBDC-related loans can discourage borrowers, thereby reducing loan demand and affecting banking activity. An increase in interest rates leads to a decrease in the quantity of CBDC in circulation, an increase in bank reserves and deposits in CBDC, and a decrease in bank loans. Monitoring the level of confidence of economic agents towards CBDCs is crucial to avoid excessive speculation.
期刊介绍:
Established in 1947, Research in Economics is one of the oldest general-interest economics journals in the world and the main one among those based in Italy. The purpose of the journal is to select original theoretical and empirical articles that will have high impact on the debate in the social sciences; since 1947, it has published important research contributions on a wide range of topics. A summary of our editorial policy is this: the editors make a preliminary assessment of whether the results of a paper, if correct, are worth publishing. If so one of the associate editors reviews the paper: from the reviewer we expect to learn if the paper is understandable and coherent and - within reasonable bounds - the results are correct. We believe that long lags in publication and multiple demands for revision simply slow scientific progress. Our goal is to provide you a definitive answer within one month of submission. We give the editors one week to judge the overall contribution and if acceptable send your paper to an associate editor. We expect the associate editor to provide a more detailed evaluation within three weeks so that the editors can make a final decision before the month expires. In the (rare) case of a revision we allow four months and in the case of conditional acceptance we allow two months to submit the final version. In both cases we expect a cover letter explaining how you met the requirements. For conditional acceptance the editors will verify that the requirements were met. In the case of revision the original associate editor will do so. If the revision cannot be at least conditionally accepted it is rejected: there is no second revision.