A Patient-Prioritized Research Agenda for Clinical Trials in Kidney Stone Disease.

Jonathan S Ellison,Kathryn E Flynn,Katherine Sheridan,Samantha Siodlarz,Jodi Antonelli,Christopher E Bayne,Hunter Beck,Christina Ching,Pankaj P Dangle,Casey Dauw,Carley Davis,Kim Hollander,Dirk Lange,Kristi Ouimet,Carswell Ouimet,Amy Y Pan,Kristina Penniston,Charles D Scales,Nayan Shah,Ryan Spiardi,Necole Streeper,Kristin Whitmore,Mike Witt,Liyun Zhang,Gregory E Tasian
{"title":"A Patient-Prioritized Research Agenda for Clinical Trials in Kidney Stone Disease.","authors":"Jonathan S Ellison,Kathryn E Flynn,Katherine Sheridan,Samantha Siodlarz,Jodi Antonelli,Christopher E Bayne,Hunter Beck,Christina Ching,Pankaj P Dangle,Casey Dauw,Carley Davis,Kim Hollander,Dirk Lange,Kristi Ouimet,Carswell Ouimet,Amy Y Pan,Kristina Penniston,Charles D Scales,Nayan Shah,Ryan Spiardi,Necole Streeper,Kristin Whitmore,Mike Witt,Liyun Zhang,Gregory E Tasian","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\r\nTo ensure that research on kidney stones provides meaningful impact for the kidney stone community, patients and caregivers should be engaged as stakeholders in clinical trial design, starting at study inception. This project aimed to elicit, refine, and prioritize research ideas from kidney stone stakeholders to develop a patient-centered research agenda for clinical trials.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nThe Kidney Stone Engagement Core, a group of patients, caregivers, advocates, clinicians, and researchers, executed an iterative process of surveys and focus groups to elicit and refine research themes, which were then translated into research questions. A separate group of patients, caregivers, and clinicians prioritized these questions through parallel modified Delphi and crowd-sourced digital platforms. A research agenda was developed by the Kidney Stone Engagement Core based on the highest rated questions during a hybrid virtual/in-person capstone session.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 70 individuals (57 patients and caregivers, 13 researchers and clinicians) participated in the elicitation, 20 individuals (15 patients and caregivers, 5 researchers and clinicians) participated in refinement, and an additional 80 individuals (81 patients and caregivers, 9 researchers and clinicians) participated in prioritization. Key novel themes emerged from elicitation and refinement: ureteral stents, genetic evaluation, shared surgical decision-making, key subgroups, cumulative disease burden, genetic evaluation, and psychosocial support. Stakeholders generated 6 proposed trials from these themes focused on surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical prevention.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nPatients and caregivers valued comparative effectiveness kidney stone research that focused on individualized care, shared decision-making, and improvement of patient-reported experiences. This process provided actionable recommendations for future patient-centered clinical trials within kidney stone disease.","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"5 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE To ensure that research on kidney stones provides meaningful impact for the kidney stone community, patients and caregivers should be engaged as stakeholders in clinical trial design, starting at study inception. This project aimed to elicit, refine, and prioritize research ideas from kidney stone stakeholders to develop a patient-centered research agenda for clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS The Kidney Stone Engagement Core, a group of patients, caregivers, advocates, clinicians, and researchers, executed an iterative process of surveys and focus groups to elicit and refine research themes, which were then translated into research questions. A separate group of patients, caregivers, and clinicians prioritized these questions through parallel modified Delphi and crowd-sourced digital platforms. A research agenda was developed by the Kidney Stone Engagement Core based on the highest rated questions during a hybrid virtual/in-person capstone session. RESULTS A total of 70 individuals (57 patients and caregivers, 13 researchers and clinicians) participated in the elicitation, 20 individuals (15 patients and caregivers, 5 researchers and clinicians) participated in refinement, and an additional 80 individuals (81 patients and caregivers, 9 researchers and clinicians) participated in prioritization. Key novel themes emerged from elicitation and refinement: ureteral stents, genetic evaluation, shared surgical decision-making, key subgroups, cumulative disease burden, genetic evaluation, and psychosocial support. Stakeholders generated 6 proposed trials from these themes focused on surveillance, surgical intervention, and medical prevention. CONCLUSIONS Patients and caregivers valued comparative effectiveness kidney stone research that focused on individualized care, shared decision-making, and improvement of patient-reported experiences. This process provided actionable recommendations for future patient-centered clinical trials within kidney stone disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾结石病临床试验的患者优先研究议程。
目的为确保肾结石研究对肾结石群体产生有意义的影响,患者和护理人员应作为利益相关者参与临床试验设计,从研究开始时就应如此。由患者、护理人员、倡导者、临床医生和研究人员组成的 "肾结石参与核心"(Kidney Stone Engagement Core)小组通过反复进行调查和焦点小组讨论,提出并完善研究主题,然后将其转化为研究问题。由患者、护理人员和临床医生组成的另一个小组通过平行修改的德尔菲和众包数字平台对这些问题进行了优先排序。结果共有 70 人(57 名患者和护理人员、13 名研究人员和临床医生)参与了征集,20 人(15 名患者和护理人员、5 名研究人员和临床医生)参与了完善,另有 80 人(81 名患者和护理人员、9 名研究人员和临床医生)参与了优先排序。在征询和完善过程中出现了一些关键的新主题:输尿管支架、遗传评估、共同手术决策、关键亚组、累积性疾病负担、遗传评估和社会心理支持。利益相关者从这些主题中提出了 6 项试验建议,主要集中在监测、手术干预和医疗预防方面。结论患者和护理人员非常重视注重个性化护理、共同决策和改善患者报告经验的肾结石比较效益研究。这一过程为今后在肾结石疾病领域开展以患者为中心的临床试验提供了可行的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primary Chemoablation of Recurrent Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer With UGN-102: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial (ENVISION). Reply: Letter: Efficacy and Safety of Vibegron for Persistent Symptoms of Overactive Bladder in Men Being Pharmacologically Treated for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results From the Phase 3 COURAGE Trial. Reviewer of the Month: Geoffrey Sonn. Comparative Analysis of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and Robotic Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP) in BPH Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clinical Factors Associated with Suspicious 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET Activity in Patients Initially Managed with Radical Prostatectomy including PSA <0.5 ng/mL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1