首页 > 最新文献

The Journal of Urology最新文献

英文 中文
Primary Chemoablation of Recurrent Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer With UGN-102: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial (ENVISION). 用 UGN-102 对复发性低分化中度风险非肌层浸润性膀胱癌进行原发性化疗消融:单臂、开放标签 3 期试验(ENVISION)。
Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004296
Sandip M Prasad,Dimitar Shishkov,Nikola Vladimirov Mihaylov,Alexandre Khuskivadze,Pencho Genov,Vasyl Terzi,Max Kates,William C Huang,Michael J Louie,Sunil Raju,Brent Burger,Andrew Meads,Mark Schoenberg
PURPOSETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of UGN-102 chemoablation for the primary treatment of patients with recurrent low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.MATERIALS AND METHODSENVISION is an ongoing, multinational, single-arm, Phase 3 study in patients with a biopsy-proven recurrence of untreated low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. Patients received 6 weekly intravesical instillations of UGN-102 (mitomycin; outpatient setting) and were evaluated at 3 months. Patients achieving complete response (CR) (negative cystoscopic examination, cytology, and for-cause biopsy) were surveilled regularly until recurrence, progression, or death. Patients who remain disease-free will be followed up to 5 years, and further results will be reported in the future.RESULTSOf 240 patients enrolled, 228 (95%) received all 6 planned doses; 191 (79.6%; 95% CI: 73.9, 84.5) achieved CR at 3 months, with an 82.3% (95% CI: 75.9, 87.1) probability of response 12 months later. Median duration of response was not estimable over a median 13.9-month follow-up period. The most common adverse events (≥5.0% of patients) were dysuria, hematuria, urinary tract infection, pollakiuria, fatigue, and urinary retention; generally mild/moderate and resolved/resolving. Serious adverse events were observed in 29/240 (12.1%), 2 were treatment-related (urinary retention/urethral stenosis), both resolved.CONCLUSIONSPrimary chemoablation with UGN-102 in patients with recurrent low-grade-intermediate-risk-nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer resulted in a 79.6% CR rate. Patients achieving a CR had an 82.3% likelihood of remaining disease-free 1 year later. The benefit-risk profile was favorable, supporting UGN-102 as a non-surgical alternative for transurethral resection of bladder tumors in this patient population. Limitations of this study included lack of tumor sizing after the diagnostic biopsy.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05243550.
目的评估 UGN-102 化疗消融用于复发性低分化中度风险非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者初治的疗效和安全性。材料与方法ENVISION 是一项正在进行的跨国单臂 3 期研究,对象是活检证实复发的未经治疗的低分化中度风险非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者。患者每周接受 6 次 UGN-102 (丝裂霉素;门诊治疗)膀胱内注射,并在 3 个月后进行评估。获得完全应答(CR)的患者(膀胱镜检查、细胞学检查和活检结果均为阴性)将定期接受观察,直至复发、病情恶化或死亡。在 240 例入组患者中,228 例(95%)接受了全部 6 个计划剂量;191 例(79.6%;95% CI:73.9, 84.5)在 3 个月后达到 CR,12 个月后达到 CR 的概率为 82.3%(95% CI:75.9, 87.1)。在中位 13.9 个月的随访期内,中位应答持续时间无法估计。最常见的不良反应(≥5.0% 的患者)是排尿困难、血尿、尿路感染、花粉尿、疲劳和尿潴留;一般为轻度/中度,并已缓解/消除。29/240(12.1%)例患者出现严重不良反应,其中2例与治疗相关(尿潴留/尿道狭窄),均已缓解。结论对复发性低级别-中度风险-非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者使用UGN-102进行初次化疗,CR率为79.6%。获得 CR 的患者 1 年后继续无病生存的可能性为 82.3%。收益-风险分析结果良好,支持UGN-102作为该患者群体经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术的非手术替代方案。这项研究的局限性包括诊断性活检后缺乏肿瘤大小的确定:NCT05243550。
{"title":"Primary Chemoablation of Recurrent Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer With UGN-102: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial (ENVISION).","authors":"Sandip M Prasad,Dimitar Shishkov,Nikola Vladimirov Mihaylov,Alexandre Khuskivadze,Pencho Genov,Vasyl Terzi,Max Kates,William C Huang,Michael J Louie,Sunil Raju,Brent Burger,Andrew Meads,Mark Schoenberg","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004296","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004296","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSETo evaluate the efficacy and safety of UGN-102 chemoablation for the primary treatment of patients with recurrent low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.MATERIALS AND METHODSENVISION is an ongoing, multinational, single-arm, Phase 3 study in patients with a biopsy-proven recurrence of untreated low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer. Patients received 6 weekly intravesical instillations of UGN-102 (mitomycin; outpatient setting) and were evaluated at 3 months. Patients achieving complete response (CR) (negative cystoscopic examination, cytology, and for-cause biopsy) were surveilled regularly until recurrence, progression, or death. Patients who remain disease-free will be followed up to 5 years, and further results will be reported in the future.RESULTSOf 240 patients enrolled, 228 (95%) received all 6 planned doses; 191 (79.6%; 95% CI: 73.9, 84.5) achieved CR at 3 months, with an 82.3% (95% CI: 75.9, 87.1) probability of response 12 months later. Median duration of response was not estimable over a median 13.9-month follow-up period. The most common adverse events (≥5.0% of patients) were dysuria, hematuria, urinary tract infection, pollakiuria, fatigue, and urinary retention; generally mild/moderate and resolved/resolving. Serious adverse events were observed in 29/240 (12.1%), 2 were treatment-related (urinary retention/urethral stenosis), both resolved.CONCLUSIONSPrimary chemoablation with UGN-102 in patients with recurrent low-grade-intermediate-risk-nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer resulted in a 79.6% CR rate. Patients achieving a CR had an 82.3% likelihood of remaining disease-free 1 year later. The benefit-risk profile was favorable, supporting UGN-102 as a non-surgical alternative for transurethral resection of bladder tumors in this patient population. Limitations of this study included lack of tumor sizing after the diagnostic biopsy.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05243550.","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"5 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004296"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142489343","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply: Letter: Efficacy and Safety of Vibegron for Persistent Symptoms of Overactive Bladder in Men Being Pharmacologically Treated for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results From the Phase 3 COURAGE Trial. 答复信:Vibegron治疗因良性前列腺增生而接受药物治疗的男性膀胱过度活动症持续症状的有效性和安全性:COURAGE 3 期试验结果。
Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004291
David Staskin,Janet Owens-Grillo,Elizabeth Thomas,Eric Rovner
{"title":"Reply: Letter: Efficacy and Safety of Vibegron for Persistent Symptoms of Overactive Bladder in Men Being Pharmacologically Treated for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results From the Phase 3 COURAGE Trial.","authors":"David Staskin,Janet Owens-Grillo,Elizabeth Thomas,Eric Rovner","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004291","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004291","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"1 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142488294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Analysis of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and Robotic Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP) in BPH Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 前列腺钬激光去核术(HoLEP)与机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术(RASP)在良性前列腺增生症治疗中的比较分析:系统回顾与元分析》。
Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004297
Tarek Benzouak,Abdulmalik Addar,Michael A Prudencio-Brunello,Ammar Saed Aldien,Steve E Amougou,Ahmad AlShammari,Mohammed Ramadhan,Serge Carrier,Mélanie Aubé-Peterkin,Fadl Hamouche
PURPOSEAs the prevalence of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) increases, the demand for surgical interventions that optimize patient outcomes while minimizing complications grows. This systematic review compares the efficacy, efficiency, and safety of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) with Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP), providing insights for evidence-based surgical decision-making in BPH treatment.MATERIALS AND METHODSAdhering to PRISMA guidelines, the study protocol was registered with Prospero [CRD42024509627]. Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL up to February 1, 2024, to include studies that compare HoLEP and RASP in BPH patients. Risk of Bias was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale.RESULTSHoLEP and RASP demonstrated equivalent effectiveness in treating BPH, as shown by similar functional outcomes like maximum urinary flow rate and post-void residual volume. However, HoLEP outperformed RASP in several operational efficiency metrics, reducing operative time by 49.48 minutes, hospitalization duration by 1.5 days, and catheterization period by 3.8 days. HoLEP also significantly reduced the risk of blood transfusions by 75%. Patients undergoing RASP were 1.87 times more at risk for grade 2 complications and 3.41 times more at risk for developing grade 3 or above complications.CONCLUSIONSHoLEP and RASP are effective for managing BPH. HoLEP shows advantages in recovery metrics and lower blood transfusion rates, while RASP benefits from ease of implementation in robotic-equipped facilities. Optimizing surgical outcomes will depend on reducing disparities in technique adoption, improving surgical training, and aligning with evidence-based guidelines.
目的随着良性前列腺增生症(BPH)发病率的增加,人们对既能优化患者治疗效果又能减少并发症的手术干预的需求也在增加。本系统性综述比较了前列腺钬激光去核术(HoLEP)与机器人辅助单纯前列腺切除术(RASP)的疗效、效率和安全性,为良性前列腺增生症治疗的循证外科决策提供见解。截至 2024 年 2 月 1 日,在 Medline、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus 和 CINAHL 中进行了检索,以纳入在良性前列腺增生患者中比较 HoLEP 和 RASP 的研究。结果HoLEP和RASP治疗良性前列腺增生症的效果相当,最大尿流率和排尿后残余尿量等功能结果相似。然而,HoLEP在几项操作效率指标上优于RASP,手术时间缩短了49.48分钟,住院时间缩短了1.5天,导尿时间缩短了3.8天。HoLEP 还大大降低了 75% 的输血风险。接受 RASP 的患者出现 2 级并发症的风险比接受 HoLEP 的患者高 1.87 倍,出现 3 级或以上并发症的风险比接受 RASP 的患者高 3.41 倍。HoLEP在恢复指标和降低输血率方面表现出优势,而RASP则得益于机器人设备的易于实施。优化手术效果将取决于缩小技术应用方面的差距、加强手术培训以及与循证指南保持一致。
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) and Robotic Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP) in BPH Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Tarek Benzouak,Abdulmalik Addar,Michael A Prudencio-Brunello,Ammar Saed Aldien,Steve E Amougou,Ahmad AlShammari,Mohammed Ramadhan,Serge Carrier,Mélanie Aubé-Peterkin,Fadl Hamouche","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004297","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004297","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSEAs the prevalence of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) increases, the demand for surgical interventions that optimize patient outcomes while minimizing complications grows. This systematic review compares the efficacy, efficiency, and safety of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) with Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy (RASP), providing insights for evidence-based surgical decision-making in BPH treatment.MATERIALS AND METHODSAdhering to PRISMA guidelines, the study protocol was registered with Prospero [CRD42024509627]. Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL up to February 1, 2024, to include studies that compare HoLEP and RASP in BPH patients. Risk of Bias was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale.RESULTSHoLEP and RASP demonstrated equivalent effectiveness in treating BPH, as shown by similar functional outcomes like maximum urinary flow rate and post-void residual volume. However, HoLEP outperformed RASP in several operational efficiency metrics, reducing operative time by 49.48 minutes, hospitalization duration by 1.5 days, and catheterization period by 3.8 days. HoLEP also significantly reduced the risk of blood transfusions by 75%. Patients undergoing RASP were 1.87 times more at risk for grade 2 complications and 3.41 times more at risk for developing grade 3 or above complications.CONCLUSIONSHoLEP and RASP are effective for managing BPH. HoLEP shows advantages in recovery metrics and lower blood transfusion rates, while RASP benefits from ease of implementation in robotic-equipped facilities. Optimizing surgical outcomes will depend on reducing disparities in technique adoption, improving surgical training, and aligning with evidence-based guidelines.","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"103 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142451450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinical Factors Associated with Suspicious 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET Activity in Patients Initially Managed with Radical Prostatectomy including PSA <0.5 ng/mL. 最初接受根治性前列腺切除术(包括 PSA <0.5 纳克/毫升)的患者中与可疑 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET 活性相关的临床因素。
Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004298
Eric V Li,Richard Bennett,Austin Ho,Clarissa Wong,Ashorne K Mahenthiran,Sai Kaushik Shankar Ramesh Kumar,Zequn Sun,Hatice Savas,Steven P Rowe,Edward M Schaeffer,Hiten D Patel,Ashley Ross
PURPOSEThere is limited data on PSMA PET/CT for work-up of recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) at low PSA values. We evaluated a PSMA PET/CT cohort of post-RP patients, focusing on patients with PSA <0.5 ng/mL.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe identified a retrospective cohort who underwent piflufolastat F-18 PSMA PET/CT across an eleven-hospital system from 7/2021-2/2023. PSMA positivity was determined by radiology reports. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with suspicious PSMA activity.RESULTSMedian PSA was 0.37 ng/mL (IQR 0.15, 1.29 ng/mL), with 49% of patients overall having at least one suspicious PSMA-avid lesion. Rates of scan positivity among patients with PSA <0.2 and 0.2-0.5 ng/mL were 34% and 38%, respectively. Among all patients, 25% (104/415) had pelvic disease (prostate bed or N1), and 24% (100/415) had M1 disease. Among patients with PSA <0.5 ng/mL, prior post-operative radiation was associated with suspicious PSMA activity. In the overall cohort, age, PSA at PSMA PET/CT, and RP Gleason Grade (GG) were associated with PSMA positivity. PSADT, EAU risk, and CAPRA-S were all associated with suspicious PSMA activity.CONCLUSIONSOver one-third of patients with PSAs <0.2 ng/mL had imaging findings concerning for recurrence. Prior post-operative radiation was associated with higher rates of PSMA positivity among patients with PSA <0.5 ng/mL, and half of patients with evidence of PSMA avid distant metastatic disease underwent metastasis directed therapy. PET-PSMA imaging at low PSAs can be considered to inform salvage therapies.
目的有关 PSMA PET/CT 用于检查 PSA 值较低的根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后复发的数据有限。我们评估了一组 RP 术后 PSMA PET/CT 患者,重点关注 PSA <0.5 ng/mL 的患者。PSMA 阳性由放射学报告确定。结果中位 PSA 为 0.37 ng/mL(IQR 0.15,1.29 ng/mL),49% 的患者至少有一个 PSMA 可疑病变。PSA <0.2和0.2-0.5纳克/毫升的患者中,扫描阳性率分别为34%和38%。在所有患者中,25%(104/415)患有盆腔疾病(前列腺床或 N1),24%(100/415)患有 M1 疾病。在 PSA <0.5 纳克/毫升的患者中,术后放疗与可疑的 PSMA 活性有关。在整个队列中,年龄、PSMA PET/CT 时的 PSA 值和 RP 格雷欣分级 (GG) 与 PSMA 阳性有关。PSADT、EAU 风险和 CAPRA-S 均与可疑的 PSMA 活性有关。PSA<0.5纳克/毫升的患者中,术后放疗与较高的PSMA阳性率相关,有证据显示PSMA阳性的远处转移性疾病患者中有一半接受了转移灶定向治疗。PSA较低时的PET-PSMA成像可作为挽救疗法的参考依据。
{"title":"Clinical Factors Associated with Suspicious 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET Activity in Patients Initially Managed with Radical Prostatectomy including PSA <0.5 ng/mL.","authors":"Eric V Li,Richard Bennett,Austin Ho,Clarissa Wong,Ashorne K Mahenthiran,Sai Kaushik Shankar Ramesh Kumar,Zequn Sun,Hatice Savas,Steven P Rowe,Edward M Schaeffer,Hiten D Patel,Ashley Ross","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004298","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004298","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSEThere is limited data on PSMA PET/CT for work-up of recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) at low PSA values. We evaluated a PSMA PET/CT cohort of post-RP patients, focusing on patients with PSA <0.5 ng/mL.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe identified a retrospective cohort who underwent piflufolastat F-18 PSMA PET/CT across an eleven-hospital system from 7/2021-2/2023. PSMA positivity was determined by radiology reports. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with suspicious PSMA activity.RESULTSMedian PSA was 0.37 ng/mL (IQR 0.15, 1.29 ng/mL), with 49% of patients overall having at least one suspicious PSMA-avid lesion. Rates of scan positivity among patients with PSA <0.2 and 0.2-0.5 ng/mL were 34% and 38%, respectively. Among all patients, 25% (104/415) had pelvic disease (prostate bed or N1), and 24% (100/415) had M1 disease. Among patients with PSA <0.5 ng/mL, prior post-operative radiation was associated with suspicious PSMA activity. In the overall cohort, age, PSA at PSMA PET/CT, and RP Gleason Grade (GG) were associated with PSMA positivity. PSADT, EAU risk, and CAPRA-S were all associated with suspicious PSMA activity.CONCLUSIONSOver one-third of patients with PSAs <0.2 ng/mL had imaging findings concerning for recurrence. Prior post-operative radiation was associated with higher rates of PSMA positivity among patients with PSA <0.5 ng/mL, and half of patients with evidence of PSMA avid distant metastatic disease underwent metastasis directed therapy. PET-PSMA imaging at low PSAs can be considered to inform salvage therapies.","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"20 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142451451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reviewer of the Month: Geoffrey Sonn. 本月评论员杰弗里-桑恩
Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004299
Geoffrey Sonn
{"title":"Reviewer of the Month: Geoffrey Sonn.","authors":"Geoffrey Sonn","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004299","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004299","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"33 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142451449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter: The Extraperitoneal Midline Approach: A Game Changer to Access the Retroperitoneum? 信腹膜外中线入路:进入腹膜后的游戏规则改变者?
Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004279
Christian Daniel Fankhauser,Silvan Sigg,Nirmish Singla
{"title":"Letter: The Extraperitoneal Midline Approach: A Game Changer to Access the Retroperitoneum?","authors":"Christian Daniel Fankhauser,Silvan Sigg,Nirmish Singla","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004279","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004279","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"18 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142443764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter: Enhancing Patient-Centered Communication in Endourologic Research: A Call for Adoption of ASCO's Language of Respect Guidelines. 信:在内科研究中加强以患者为中心的交流:呼吁采用 ASCO 尊重语言指南。
Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004270
Jonathan Alcantar,Brandon Piyevsky,Mohammed Shahait,Ryan W Dobbs
{"title":"Letter: Enhancing Patient-Centered Communication in Endourologic Research: A Call for Adoption of ASCO's Language of Respect Guidelines.","authors":"Jonathan Alcantar,Brandon Piyevsky,Mohammed Shahait,Ryan W Dobbs","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004270","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004270","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"68 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142443765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Error to Excellence: An Evolving Paradigm for Improving the Diagnostic Process. 从错误到卓越:从错误到卓越:改进诊断过程的演变范式》。
Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004281
Karen E Johnson,David F Friedlander,Matthew E Nielsen
{"title":"From Error to Excellence: An Evolving Paradigm for Improving the Diagnostic Process.","authors":"Karen E Johnson,David F Friedlander,Matthew E Nielsen","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004281","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004281","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"99 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142448026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can We Be Less Active in Prostate Cancer Surveillance? 我们能否减少前列腺癌监测的积极性?
Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004277
Miko Filon,Brock O'Neil
{"title":"Can We Be Less Active in Prostate Cancer Surveillance?","authors":"Miko Filon,Brock O'Neil","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004277","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004277","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"89 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004277"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142443763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implants in Men: a National Healthcare Data System-based Study to Assess Reinterventions in France. 男性人工尿道括约肌植入术:基于国家医疗保健数据系统的法国再干预评估研究。
Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000004285
Louis Lenfant,Yoann Taillé,Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler,Bertrand Lukacs,Thomas Seisen,Morgan Roupret,Aurélien Beaugerie,Eric Vicaut,Pierre C Mozer
PURPOSESignificant concerns remain regarding the long-term outcomes of AMS 800™ artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implants in men. The objective was to assess the long-term AUS reintervention (replacement or removal) rates after a first-ever AUS implantation.MATERIALS AND METHODSThis population-based retrospective cohort study included all men aged ≥18 years in France who underwent a first-ever AUS implantation (identified using a unique device identifier) for male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following prostate cancer (PCa) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatment, between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was reintervention-free survival rates (replacements and removals), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary outcomes were replacement and removal. A multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model was used to assess associations between patient and hospital factors and the hazard of reintervention.RESULTSThe study included 8,475 men with a median age of 69 years (IQR 65-74) and a median follow-up time of 6 years (IQR 3-9). Reintervention-free survival was 71% (95%CI, 70-72) at 2 years, 57% (95%CI, 55-58) at 5 years, and 40% (95%CI, 38-41) at 10 years. Reintervention-free survival was lower after BPH surgery, after radiotherapy combined with RP, and in centers performing fewer implantations. Removal-free survival was 83% (95% CI, 83%-84%) at 2 years, 75% (95% CI, 74%-76%) at 5 years, and 66% (95% CI, 65%-68%) at 10 years.CONCLUSIONSAmong men undergoing AUS implantation for SUI due to PCa or BPH treatment, the probability of reintervention was 29% within two years after implantation. The median time to reintervention was 6.6 years (IQR: 6.4-7.1), and the reintervention-free survival rate at 10 years was 40%. These insights can inform therapeutic decision-making for patients and surgeons during the management of male SUI.
目的人们对 AMS 800™ 人工尿道括约肌 (AUS) 在男性中植入后的长期效果仍有很大的担忧。材料和方法这项基于人群的回顾性队列研究纳入了 2006 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间法国所有年龄≥18 岁的男性,他们在接受前列腺癌 (PCa) 或良性前列腺增生 (BPH) 治疗后,因男性压力性尿失禁 (SUI) 而首次接受了 AUS 植入手术(使用唯一的设备标识符进行识别)。主要结果是无再介入生存率(置换和切除),采用卡普兰-梅耶法估算。次要结果是置换和切除。采用多变量 Cox 比例危险模型评估患者和医院因素与再介入危险之间的关系。结果该研究纳入了 8475 名男性,中位年龄为 69 岁(IQR 65-74),中位随访时间为 6 年(IQR 3-9)。2年后无再干预生存率为71%(95%CI,70-72),5年后为57%(95%CI,55-58),10年后为40%(95%CI,38-41)。良性前列腺增生症手术后、放疗联合 RP 后以及实施植入手术较少的中心的无再介入生存率较低。结论在因 PCa 或 BPH 治疗而接受 AUS 植入术治疗 SUI 的男性中,植入后两年内再干预的概率为 29%。再次介入治疗的中位时间为 6.6 年(IQR:6.4-7.1),10 年后无再次介入治疗的生存率为 40%。这些见解可为患者和外科医生在治疗男性 SUI 过程中的治疗决策提供参考。
{"title":"Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implants in Men: a National Healthcare Data System-based Study to Assess Reinterventions in France.","authors":"Louis Lenfant,Yoann Taillé,Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler,Bertrand Lukacs,Thomas Seisen,Morgan Roupret,Aurélien Beaugerie,Eric Vicaut,Pierre C Mozer","doi":"10.1097/ju.0000000000004285","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000004285","url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSESignificant concerns remain regarding the long-term outcomes of AMS 800™ artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implants in men. The objective was to assess the long-term AUS reintervention (replacement or removal) rates after a first-ever AUS implantation.MATERIALS AND METHODSThis population-based retrospective cohort study included all men aged ≥18 years in France who underwent a first-ever AUS implantation (identified using a unique device identifier) for male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following prostate cancer (PCa) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treatment, between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2018. The primary outcome was reintervention-free survival rates (replacements and removals), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary outcomes were replacement and removal. A multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model was used to assess associations between patient and hospital factors and the hazard of reintervention.RESULTSThe study included 8,475 men with a median age of 69 years (IQR 65-74) and a median follow-up time of 6 years (IQR 3-9). Reintervention-free survival was 71% (95%CI, 70-72) at 2 years, 57% (95%CI, 55-58) at 5 years, and 40% (95%CI, 38-41) at 10 years. Reintervention-free survival was lower after BPH surgery, after radiotherapy combined with RP, and in centers performing fewer implantations. Removal-free survival was 83% (95% CI, 83%-84%) at 2 years, 75% (95% CI, 74%-76%) at 5 years, and 66% (95% CI, 65%-68%) at 10 years.CONCLUSIONSAmong men undergoing AUS implantation for SUI due to PCa or BPH treatment, the probability of reintervention was 29% within two years after implantation. The median time to reintervention was 6.6 years (IQR: 6.4-7.1), and the reintervention-free survival rate at 10 years was 40%. These insights can inform therapeutic decision-making for patients and surgeons during the management of male SUI.","PeriodicalId":501636,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Urology","volume":"10 1","pages":"101097JU0000000000004285"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142439367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The Journal of Urology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1