Effects of exercise therapy on chemotherapy delivery and response in primary breast cancer: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-22 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35575
Neil M Iyengar, Jessica M Scott, Jasme Lee, Jessica A Lavery, Katherine L Foug, Catherine P Lee, Meghan G Michalski, Su S Chun, Jenna Harrison, Chaya S Moskowitz, Lee W Jones
{"title":"Effects of exercise therapy on chemotherapy delivery and response in primary breast cancer: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial.","authors":"Neil M Iyengar, Jessica M Scott, Jasme Lee, Jessica A Lavery, Katherine L Foug, Catherine P Lee, Meghan G Michalski, Su S Chun, Jenna Harrison, Chaya S Moskowitz, Lee W Jones","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whether structured exercise therapy improves chemotherapy delivery, tolerability, and tumor response is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a phase 2 trial investigating exercise therapy (n = 72) versus usual care (n = 72) in patients with primary breast cancer. Exercise therapy comprised individualized treadmill walking three times weekly for 20-50 minutes per session at 55%-100% of pretreatment exercise capacity. Chemotherapy delivery was assessed according to the relative dose intensity (RDI), tolerability was assessed according to patient-reported outcomes and blood laboratory values, and response was assessed based on the pathologic complete response rate in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the exercise therapy group, 51 patients (71%) reached 100% RDI (median, 100%; interquartile range, 100%-100%) compared with 41 patients (57%) in the usual care group (median, 100%; interquartile range, 95%-100%; p = .08). Tolerability was similar in both groups; the rates of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and anemia were 22% versus 39% and 7% versus 10% in the exercise and usual care groups, respectively. In patients who received anthracyclines (n = 104), 41 (77%) had 100% chemotherapy RDI in the exercise therapy group versus 29 (57%) in the usual care group (p = .026). In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy subgroup (n = 51 tumors), the postneoadjuvant therapy (yp) pathologic complete response (ypT0ypN0) rate was 27% (95% confidence interval, 12%-50%) in the exercise therapy group compared with 28% (95% confidence interval, 13%-47%) in the usual care group (p > .9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with primary breast cancer, exercise therapy was associated with improved delivery of anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Although exercise therapy was not significantly associated with tumor response, effects varied by tumor subtype (trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01943695).</p>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"e35575"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35575","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whether structured exercise therapy improves chemotherapy delivery, tolerability, and tumor response is unclear.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a phase 2 trial investigating exercise therapy (n = 72) versus usual care (n = 72) in patients with primary breast cancer. Exercise therapy comprised individualized treadmill walking three times weekly for 20-50 minutes per session at 55%-100% of pretreatment exercise capacity. Chemotherapy delivery was assessed according to the relative dose intensity (RDI), tolerability was assessed according to patient-reported outcomes and blood laboratory values, and response was assessed based on the pathologic complete response rate in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Results: In the exercise therapy group, 51 patients (71%) reached 100% RDI (median, 100%; interquartile range, 100%-100%) compared with 41 patients (57%) in the usual care group (median, 100%; interquartile range, 95%-100%; p = .08). Tolerability was similar in both groups; the rates of grade 3 or higher neutropenia and anemia were 22% versus 39% and 7% versus 10% in the exercise and usual care groups, respectively. In patients who received anthracyclines (n = 104), 41 (77%) had 100% chemotherapy RDI in the exercise therapy group versus 29 (57%) in the usual care group (p = .026). In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy subgroup (n = 51 tumors), the postneoadjuvant therapy (yp) pathologic complete response (ypT0ypN0) rate was 27% (95% confidence interval, 12%-50%) in the exercise therapy group compared with 28% (95% confidence interval, 13%-47%) in the usual care group (p > .9).

Conclusions: In patients with primary breast cancer, exercise therapy was associated with improved delivery of anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Although exercise therapy was not significantly associated with tumor response, effects varied by tumor subtype (trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01943695).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动疗法对原发性乳腺癌化疗给药和反应的影响:随机试验的二次分析
背景:结构化运动疗法是否能改善化疗效果、耐受性和肿瘤反应尚不清楚:结构化运动疗法能否改善化疗效果、耐受性和肿瘤反应尚不清楚:这是一项对原发性乳腺癌患者运动疗法(n = 72)与常规护理(n = 72)进行研究的 2 期试验的二次分析。运动疗法包括个性化的跑步机步行,每周三次,每次20-50分钟,运动量为治疗前的55%-100%。化疗效果根据相对剂量强度(RDI)进行评估,耐受性根据患者报告的结果和血液化验值进行评估,反应根据接受新辅助化疗患者的病理完全反应率进行评估:在运动疗法组中,51 名患者(71%)的 RDI 达到 100%(中位数,100%;四分位数间距,100%-100%),而在常规治疗组中,41 名患者(57%)的 RDI 达到 100%(中位数,100%;四分位数间距,95%-100%;P = .08)。两组患者的耐受性相似;运动组和常规护理组的 3 级或以上中性粒细胞减少和贫血发生率分别为 22% 对 39% 和 7% 对 10%。在接受蒽环类药物治疗的患者中(n = 104),运动疗法组有 41 人(77%)的化疗 RDI 达到 100%,而常规护理组有 29 人(57%)(p = 0.026)。在新辅助化疗亚组(n = 51 例肿瘤)中,运动疗法组的新辅助治疗后病理完全反应率(ypT0ypN0)为 27%(95% 置信区间,12%-50%),而常规护理组为 28%(95% 置信区间,13%-47%)(p > .9):结论:在原发性乳腺癌患者中,运动疗法与蒽环类化疗效果的改善有关。尽管运动疗法与肿瘤反应无明显关联,但其效果因肿瘤亚型而异(试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01943695)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
期刊最新文献
Addressing socioeconomic barriers in the implementation of American Society of Clinical Oncology palliative care guidelines. Association of mental health treatment receipt with cancer screening among US adults with a history of anxiety or depression. Impact of smoking status on engagement in remote symptom monitoring after oncologic surgery: Implications for symptom management and readmission rates. The long road to unbiased estimates of pancreatic cancer incidence in the hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. A phase 2 basket study of talabostat, a small-molecule inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidases, administered in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid cancers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1