Comparison of effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and peloidotherapy in patients with plantar fasciitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS International Journal of Biometeorology Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1007/s00484-024-02787-2
Emine Akdere, Savaş Karpuz, Ramazan Yılmaz, Halil Ekrem Akkurt, Halim Yılmaz
{"title":"Comparison of effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and peloidotherapy in patients with plantar fasciitis: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.","authors":"Emine Akdere, Savaş Karpuz, Ramazan Yılmaz, Halil Ekrem Akkurt, Halim Yılmaz","doi":"10.1007/s00484-024-02787-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although peloidotherapy and ESWT are effective treatments for plantar fasciitis, there is no comprehensive research that directly compares their effectiveness. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ESWT and peloidotherapy on pain, quality of life and functional status in individuals diagnosed with plantar fasciitis (PF). A total of 78 patients, aged between 18 and 65 years, diagnosed with PF after a thorough anamnesis and physical examination and experiencing heel pain for at least 3 months or longer and who presented to the Clinic between January 2021 and January 2023, were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. The peloidotherapy group received 15 sessions of peloid therapy five days a week for three weeks, while the ESWT group received three sessions of radial-type ESWT once a week for three weeks. Additionally, all patients were given a home exercise program. All patients were evaluated three times for treatment efficacy. Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Heel Tenderness Index (HTI), functional status and quality of life were assessed using the Foot Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Short Form 36 (SF-36), respectively. In both treatment groups, there was a statistically significant improvement in VAS, HTI, FAOS and SF-36 scores at the end of treatment and during the one-month follow-up, compared to the initial baseline values. A statistically significant difference in favor of peloidotherapy was observed in post-treatment symptom and pain scores (p = 0.046). However, this difference did not persist at the one-month follow-up. Both active treatment methods were similarly effective and no superiority was observed between them (p > 0.05). Peloidotherapy and ESWT treatments, along with a home exercise program, were found to be effective for patients with plantar fasciitis. In the conservative treatment of PF, both peloidotherapy and ESWT can be recommended as effective and reliable options.</p>","PeriodicalId":588,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biometeorology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biometeorology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-024-02787-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although peloidotherapy and ESWT are effective treatments for plantar fasciitis, there is no comprehensive research that directly compares their effectiveness. Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ESWT and peloidotherapy on pain, quality of life and functional status in individuals diagnosed with plantar fasciitis (PF). A total of 78 patients, aged between 18 and 65 years, diagnosed with PF after a thorough anamnesis and physical examination and experiencing heel pain for at least 3 months or longer and who presented to the Clinic between January 2021 and January 2023, were included in the study. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. The peloidotherapy group received 15 sessions of peloid therapy five days a week for three weeks, while the ESWT group received three sessions of radial-type ESWT once a week for three weeks. Additionally, all patients were given a home exercise program. All patients were evaluated three times for treatment efficacy. Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Heel Tenderness Index (HTI), functional status and quality of life were assessed using the Foot Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Short Form 36 (SF-36), respectively. In both treatment groups, there was a statistically significant improvement in VAS, HTI, FAOS and SF-36 scores at the end of treatment and during the one-month follow-up, compared to the initial baseline values. A statistically significant difference in favor of peloidotherapy was observed in post-treatment symptom and pain scores (p = 0.046). However, this difference did not persist at the one-month follow-up. Both active treatment methods were similarly effective and no superiority was observed between them (p > 0.05). Peloidotherapy and ESWT treatments, along with a home exercise program, were found to be effective for patients with plantar fasciitis. In the conservative treatment of PF, both peloidotherapy and ESWT can be recommended as effective and reliable options.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较体外冲击波疗法和骨盆疗法对足底筋膜炎患者的疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
尽管骨盆疗法和 ESWT 是治疗足底筋膜炎的有效方法,但目前还没有直接比较这两种疗法疗效的全面研究。我们的研究旨在比较 ESWT 和类骨盆疗法对确诊足底筋膜炎(PF)患者的疼痛、生活质量和功能状态的疗效。本研究共纳入 78 名患者,年龄在 18 岁至 65 岁之间,经过全面的病史和体格检查后确诊为足底筋膜炎,足跟疼痛至少持续 3 个月或更长时间,并在 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月期间就诊。患者被随机分配到两组。骨盆疗法组接受每周五天、为期三周、共 15 次的骨盆疗法,而 ESWT 组接受每周一次、为期三周、共三次的径向型 ESWT。此外,所有患者都接受了家庭锻炼计划。所有患者均接受了三次疗效评估。疼痛程度采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和足跟触痛指数(HTI)进行评估,功能状态和生活质量分别采用足踝结果评分(FAOS)和简表 36(SF-36)进行评估。与最初的基线值相比,两个治疗组在治疗结束时和一个月的随访期间的VAS、HTI、FAOS和SF-36评分都有统计学意义上的显著改善。在治疗后的症状和疼痛评分方面,观察到了有利于骨盆环形疗法的统计学差异(p = 0.046)。然而,这种差异在一个月的随访中并未持续。两种积极治疗方法的疗效相似,没有发现优劣之分(p > 0.05)。研究发现,髓核疗法和 ESWT 治疗以及家庭锻炼计划对足底筋膜炎患者有效。在足底筋膜炎的保守治疗中,骨盆疗法和 ESWT 都是有效而可靠的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
183
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles and short communications on studies examining the interactions between living organisms and factors of the natural and artificial atmospheric environment. Living organisms extend from single cell organisms, to plants and animals, including humans. The atmospheric environment includes climate and weather, electromagnetic radiation, and chemical and biological pollutants. The journal embraces basic and applied research and practical aspects such as living conditions, agriculture, forestry, and health. The journal is published for the International Society of Biometeorology, and most membership categories include a subscription to the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Gross primary productivity estimation through remote sensing and machine learning techniques in the high Andean Region of Ecuador. Association between nighttime and daytime ambient temperature and insomnia using national emergency department database in the capital city of South Korea. Mapping tree canopy thermal refugia for birds using biophysical models and LiDAR. Medical meteorological forecast for ischemic stroke: random forest regression vs long short-term memory model. The impact of diurnal temperature range on the risk of hospitalizations in a low-income setting: the case of the Central Coast of Vietnam.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1