Comparison of the efficacy of phloroglucinol versus ritodrine hydrochloride in preventing miscarriage and adverse reactions.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-08-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/HKJR8151
Jing Wang, Bo Liu, Ting Tian, Xiaocai Zhang, Bei Chen, Min Wang, Yuanfeng Gou, Libin Lian
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of phloroglucinol versus ritodrine hydrochloride in preventing miscarriage and adverse reactions.","authors":"Jing Wang, Bo Liu, Ting Tian, Xiaocai Zhang, Bei Chen, Min Wang, Yuanfeng Gou, Libin Lian","doi":"10.62347/HKJR8151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the efficacy of phloroglucinol versus ritodrine hydrochloride in preventing miscarriage and adverse reactions (ARs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 211 patients with threatened abortion or premature birth who were admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine between July 2019 and July 2021. The control group (n=57) received ritodrine hydrochloride, while the observation group (n=154) was treated with phloroglucinol. We compared the overall therapeutic efficacy, time to symptom resolution, cessation of uterine contractions, success rate of miscarriage prevention, and full-term pregnancy rate between the two groups. Estrogen levels, including serum progesterone (P), estradiol (E2), and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), were measured and compared before and after treatment using ELISA. Additionally, neonatal outcomes, such as birth weight, Apgar scores, and umbilical arterial blood gas parameters [pH value, partial pressure of oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO<sub>2</sub>)], were evaluated and compared between the groups. Finally, the incidence of ARs during treatment was assessed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the control group, the observation group had higher effective rate of treatment, success rate of miscarriage prevention, and a full-term pregnancy rate (all P<0.05). The times to symptom resolution and cessation of uterine contractions were markedly shorter in the observation group than those in the control group (both P<0.05). After treatment, levels of serum P, E<sub>2</sub>, and hCG in the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (all P<0.05). Additionally, the body weight, Apgar scores, pH value, and PaO<sub>2</sub> of the neonates in the observation group were higher, while PaCO<sub>2</sub> and the incidence of ARs were lower compared to the control group (all P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For threatened abortion or threatened premature labor, phloroglucinol is more effective than ritodrine hydrochloride for clinical intervention and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384343/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/HKJR8151","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the efficacy of phloroglucinol versus ritodrine hydrochloride in preventing miscarriage and adverse reactions (ARs).

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 211 patients with threatened abortion or premature birth who were admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine between July 2019 and July 2021. The control group (n=57) received ritodrine hydrochloride, while the observation group (n=154) was treated with phloroglucinol. We compared the overall therapeutic efficacy, time to symptom resolution, cessation of uterine contractions, success rate of miscarriage prevention, and full-term pregnancy rate between the two groups. Estrogen levels, including serum progesterone (P), estradiol (E2), and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), were measured and compared before and after treatment using ELISA. Additionally, neonatal outcomes, such as birth weight, Apgar scores, and umbilical arterial blood gas parameters [pH value, partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), and partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2)], were evaluated and compared between the groups. Finally, the incidence of ARs during treatment was assessed and compared.

Results: Compared to the control group, the observation group had higher effective rate of treatment, success rate of miscarriage prevention, and a full-term pregnancy rate (all P<0.05). The times to symptom resolution and cessation of uterine contractions were markedly shorter in the observation group than those in the control group (both P<0.05). After treatment, levels of serum P, E2, and hCG in the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (all P<0.05). Additionally, the body weight, Apgar scores, pH value, and PaO2 of the neonates in the observation group were higher, while PaCO2 and the incidence of ARs were lower compared to the control group (all P<0.05).

Conclusion: For threatened abortion or threatened premature labor, phloroglucinol is more effective than ritodrine hydrochloride for clinical intervention and treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较氯羟吡啶与盐酸利托君在预防流产和不良反应方面的疗效。
目的分析氟桂利嗪与盐酸利托君在预防流产及不良反应(ARs)方面的疗效:对陕西中医药大学第二附属医院2019年7月至2021年7月期间收治的211例妊娠流产或早产患者进行回顾性分析。对照组(n=57)接受盐酸利托君治疗,观察组(n=154)接受氟桂利嗪治疗。我们比较了两组的总体疗效、症状缓解时间、子宫收缩停止时间、流产预防成功率和足月妊娠率。使用 ELISA 测量并比较了治疗前后的雌激素水平,包括血清孕酮(P)、雌二醇(E2)和人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)。此外,还对新生儿的出生体重、Apgar 评分和脐动脉血气参数[pH 值、氧分压(PaO2)和二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)]进行了评估,并在各组之间进行了比较。最后,评估并比较了治疗期间 AR 的发生率:结果:与对照组相比,观察组的治疗有效率、流产预防成功率、足月妊娠率(所有 P2、hCG)均显著高于对照组(所有 P2),而 PaCO2 和 ARs 发生率则低于对照组(所有 PC):对于濒临流产或濒临早产的产妇,在临床干预和治疗方面,氯羟吡啶比盐酸利托君更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Mentorship in academic musculoskeletal radiology: perspectives from a junior faculty member. Underlying synovial sarcoma undiagnosed for more than 20 years in a patient with regional pain: a case report. Sacrococcygeal chordoma with spontaneous regression due to a large hemorrhagic component. Associations of cumulative voriconazole dose, treatment duration, and alkaline phosphatase with voriconazole-induced periostitis. Can the presence of SLAP-5 lesions be predicted by using the critical shoulder angle in traumatic anterior shoulder instability?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1