Development of an early mobilization practice for critically ill patients in intensive care units: a Delphi method study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL American journal of translational research Pub Date : 2024-08-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/ASAB6587
Biantong Jiang, Huan Liu, Yao Liu, Yongming Tian, Mengzhen Nie, Wenwen Jing, Aiping Du
{"title":"Development of an early mobilization practice for critically ill patients in intensive care units: a Delphi method study.","authors":"Biantong Jiang, Huan Liu, Yao Liu, Yongming Tian, Mengzhen Nie, Wenwen Jing, Aiping Du","doi":"10.62347/ASAB6587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a comprehensive and evidence-based early rehabilitation framework for critically ill patients, aiming to establish a systematic and scientifically grounded rehabilitation system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi survey study was conducted, involving two rounds of consultations with 24 experts from critical care medicine, nursing, respiratory therapy, and rehabilitation medicine. Based on evidence from the literature, a draft rehabilitation system was created and evaluated using a Likert 5-point scale. Entries were refined based on expert feedback, with criteria for inclusion being a mean score ≥4, a coefficient of variation <0.25, and agreement (percentage of ratings as \"very important\" or \"important\" and \"very operative\" or \"strong operability\") ≥75%. Entries were modified or deleted according to expert suggestions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey achieved recall rates of 95.8% (23/24) and 86.9% (20/23) in the first and second rounds, respectively. The experts' judgment basis, familiarity, and authority coefficients were 0.96, 0.94, and 0.95, respectively. Following the initial round, 20 questionnaire entries were amended, 14 new entries were added, and 1 was deleted. The second round of Delphi consultations resulted in an early rehabilitation system consisting of 5 primary indicators, 21 secondary indicators, and 56 tertiary indicators, totaling 82 entries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study established the first Chinese early rehabilitation system for critically ill patients based on the scientific Delphi method. It provides a structured framework that can serve as a reference for early rehabilitation practices in settings for critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7731,"journal":{"name":"American journal of translational research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384373/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of translational research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/ASAB6587","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop a comprehensive and evidence-based early rehabilitation framework for critically ill patients, aiming to establish a systematic and scientifically grounded rehabilitation system.

Methods: A Delphi survey study was conducted, involving two rounds of consultations with 24 experts from critical care medicine, nursing, respiratory therapy, and rehabilitation medicine. Based on evidence from the literature, a draft rehabilitation system was created and evaluated using a Likert 5-point scale. Entries were refined based on expert feedback, with criteria for inclusion being a mean score ≥4, a coefficient of variation <0.25, and agreement (percentage of ratings as "very important" or "important" and "very operative" or "strong operability") ≥75%. Entries were modified or deleted according to expert suggestions.

Results: The survey achieved recall rates of 95.8% (23/24) and 86.9% (20/23) in the first and second rounds, respectively. The experts' judgment basis, familiarity, and authority coefficients were 0.96, 0.94, and 0.95, respectively. Following the initial round, 20 questionnaire entries were amended, 14 new entries were added, and 1 was deleted. The second round of Delphi consultations resulted in an early rehabilitation system consisting of 5 primary indicators, 21 secondary indicators, and 56 tertiary indicators, totaling 82 entries.

Conclusions: This study established the first Chinese early rehabilitation system for critically ill patients based on the scientific Delphi method. It provides a structured framework that can serve as a reference for early rehabilitation practices in settings for critically ill patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护室危重病人早期动员实践的发展:德尔菲法研究。
目的为重症患者制定一个全面的、以证据为基础的早期康复框架,旨在建立一个系统的、有科学依据的康复体系:方法:开展德尔菲调查研究,与来自重症医学、护理、呼吸治疗和康复医学的 24 位专家进行两轮磋商。根据文献中的证据,创建了康复系统草案,并使用李克特 5 点量表进行评估。根据专家的反馈意见对条目进行了完善,纳入标准为平均分≥4,变异系数结果:第一轮和第二轮调查的回收率分别为 95.8%(23/24)和 86.9%(20/23)。专家的判断基础系数、熟悉系数和权威系数分别为 0.96、0.94 和 0.95。首轮磋商后,修改了 20 个问卷条目,新增了 14 个条目,删除了 1 个条目。经过第二轮德尔菲协商,形成了由 5 个一级指标、21 个二级指标和 56 个三级指标组成的早期康复体系,共 82 个条目:本研究基于科学的德尔菲法建立了中国首个重症患者早期康复体系。结论:本研究基于科学的德尔菲法建立了中国首个重症患者早期康复体系,为重症患者的早期康复实践提供了一个结构化的框架参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of translational research
American journal of translational research ONCOLOGY-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
552
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for improving prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients. Comparison of the efficacy of phloroglucinol versus ritodrine hydrochloride in preventing miscarriage and adverse reactions. Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of hip arthroplasty and proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures. A comparative study of the efficacy and safety of PD-1/L1 inhibitor and platinum-containing dual-agent chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer resistant to EGFR-TKIs. A dual analysis of bougie and stylet development trend and impact of Chinese regulations on medical devices innovation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1