New beginnings for dead ends: polyploidy, -SSE models, and the dead-end hypothesis.

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES Annals of botany Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1093/aob/mcae143
Eric R Hagen, Jeremy M Beaulieu
{"title":"New beginnings for dead ends: polyploidy, -SSE models, and the dead-end hypothesis.","authors":"Eric R Hagen, Jeremy M Beaulieu","doi":"10.1093/aob/mcae143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the mid-twentieth century, it has been argued by some that the transition from diploidy to polyploidy is an \"evolutionary dead end\" in plants. While this point has been debated ever since, multiple definitions of \"dead end\" have been used in the polyploidy literature without sufficient differentiation between alternative uses.</p><p><strong>Scope: </strong>Here, we focus on the two most common conceptions of the dead-end hypothesis currently discussed: the \"lowering diversification\" hypothesis and the \"rarely successful\" hypothesis. We discuss the evidence for both hypotheses, and we employ a recently developed method of inferring tip diversification rates to demonstrate tests for the effect of ploidy on diversification in Solanaceae.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We find that diversification rates in the family are not strongly correlated with ploidy or with the closely related trait of breeding system. We also outline recent work in the field that moves beyond the relatively simple question of whether polyploidy increases, decreases, or does not significantly affect diversification rates in plants.</p>","PeriodicalId":8023,"journal":{"name":"Annals of botany","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcae143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the mid-twentieth century, it has been argued by some that the transition from diploidy to polyploidy is an "evolutionary dead end" in plants. While this point has been debated ever since, multiple definitions of "dead end" have been used in the polyploidy literature without sufficient differentiation between alternative uses.

Scope: Here, we focus on the two most common conceptions of the dead-end hypothesis currently discussed: the "lowering diversification" hypothesis and the "rarely successful" hypothesis. We discuss the evidence for both hypotheses, and we employ a recently developed method of inferring tip diversification rates to demonstrate tests for the effect of ploidy on diversification in Solanaceae.

Conclusions: We find that diversification rates in the family are not strongly correlated with ploidy or with the closely related trait of breeding system. We also outline recent work in the field that moves beyond the relatively simple question of whether polyploidy increases, decreases, or does not significantly affect diversification rates in plants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
死胡同的新开端:多倍体、-SSE 模型和死胡同假说。
背景:自 20 世纪中叶以来,一些人一直认为,从二倍体过渡到多倍体是植物 "进化的死胡同"。尽管从那时起人们就对这一观点展开了争论,但多倍体文献中一直在使用 "死胡同 "的多种定义,而没有充分区分不同的用途:在此,我们将重点讨论目前讨论的两种最常见的 "死胡同 "假说概念:"降低多样化 "假说和 "很少成功 "假说。我们讨论了这两种假说的证据,并采用了最近开发的推断尖端多样化率的方法来证明倍性对茄科植物多样化的影响:我们发现,茄科植物的多样化率与倍数或与密切相关的育种系统性状并无密切联系。我们还概述了该领域的最新工作,这些工作超越了多倍体是否会增加、减少或不会显著影响植物多样化率这一相对简单的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of botany
Annals of botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Botany is an international plant science journal publishing novel and rigorous research in all areas of plant science. It is published monthly in both electronic and printed forms with at least two extra issues each year that focus on a particular theme in plant biology. The Journal is managed by the Annals of Botany Company, a not-for-profit educational charity established to promote plant science worldwide. The Journal publishes original research papers, invited and submitted review articles, ''Research in Context'' expanding on original work, ''Botanical Briefings'' as short overviews of important topics, and ''Viewpoints'' giving opinions. All papers in each issue are summarized briefly in Content Snapshots , there are topical news items in the Plant Cuttings section and Book Reviews . A rigorous review process ensures that readers are exposed to genuine and novel advances across a wide spectrum of botanical knowledge. All papers aim to advance knowledge and make a difference to our understanding of plant science.
期刊最新文献
Did Crop Domestication Change the Fitness Landscape of Root Response to Soil Mechanical Impedance? An in-silico Analysis. Functional biogeography of the thermal thresholds for post-dispersal embryo growth in Conopodium majus. Correction to: Centromere drive may propel the evolution of chromosome and genome size in plants. Orchid phylogenetics and evolution: history, current status and prospects. Transcriptome sequencing data provide a solid base to understand the phylogenetic relationships, biogeography and reticulated evolution of the genus Zamia L. (Cycadales: Zamiaceae).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1