Association Between Long- Versus Short-Acting Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists and Hypotension During Anesthesia Induction: A Retrospective Study.

Masahiro Kuroki, Hiroto Suzuki, Yu Onodera, Masaki Nakane, Kaneyuki Kawamae
{"title":"Association Between Long- Versus Short-Acting Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists and Hypotension During Anesthesia Induction: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Masahiro Kuroki, Hiroto Suzuki, Yu Onodera, Masaki Nakane, Kaneyuki Kawamae","doi":"10.6859/aja.202409/PP.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The withdrawal or continuation of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) before surgery continues to be debated. We hypothesized that this is because ARBs with different half-lives have not been studied individually. This retrospective study aimed to clarify whether the degree of hypotension during anesthesia induction differs among ARBs with different half-lives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included patients who received general anesthesia with regular oral administration of telmisartan (group T) or valsartan (group V), which have half-lives of approximately 24 and 6 hours, respectively. The frequency of hypotension and vasopressor frequency and dose during anesthesia induction were compared between the two groups. At our hospital, ARBs were withdrawn on the day of surgery in all patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups T and V included 190 and 132 patients, respectively. Patient backgrounds in group V were significantly more strongly associated with the use of calcium channel blockers. No significant differences were observed in the use of other concomitant antihypertensive medications, cardiovascular complications, or renal function. The time during which the mean arterial blood pressure was < 60 mmHg during anesthesia induction was significantly greater in group T than in group V (11 min vs. 7 min, P=0.030). The proportion of patients who used vasopressors was significantly higher in group T than that in group V (74.2% vs. 56.0%, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients taking telmisartan showed more hypotensive during the induction of general anesthesia than those taking valsartan, even after withdrawal on the day of surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8482,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6859/aja.202409/PP.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The withdrawal or continuation of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) before surgery continues to be debated. We hypothesized that this is because ARBs with different half-lives have not been studied individually. This retrospective study aimed to clarify whether the degree of hypotension during anesthesia induction differs among ARBs with different half-lives.

Methods: We included patients who received general anesthesia with regular oral administration of telmisartan (group T) or valsartan (group V), which have half-lives of approximately 24 and 6 hours, respectively. The frequency of hypotension and vasopressor frequency and dose during anesthesia induction were compared between the two groups. At our hospital, ARBs were withdrawn on the day of surgery in all patients.

Results: Groups T and V included 190 and 132 patients, respectively. Patient backgrounds in group V were significantly more strongly associated with the use of calcium channel blockers. No significant differences were observed in the use of other concomitant antihypertensive medications, cardiovascular complications, or renal function. The time during which the mean arterial blood pressure was < 60 mmHg during anesthesia induction was significantly greater in group T than in group V (11 min vs. 7 min, P=0.030). The proportion of patients who used vasopressors was significantly higher in group T than that in group V (74.2% vs. 56.0%, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Patients taking telmisartan showed more hypotensive during the induction of general anesthesia than those taking valsartan, even after withdrawal on the day of surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长效与短效血管紧张素 II 受体拮抗剂与麻醉诱导期间低血压之间的关系:一项回顾性研究。
背景:关于手术前停用或继续使用血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂 (ARB) 的问题一直存在争议。我们推测这是因为尚未对不同半衰期的 ARBs 进行单独研究。这项回顾性研究旨在明确不同半衰期的 ARB 在麻醉诱导期间的低血压程度是否有所不同:我们纳入了接受全身麻醉并定期口服替米沙坦(T 组)或缬沙坦(V 组)的患者,这两种药物的半衰期分别约为 24 小时和 6 小时。比较了两组患者在麻醉诱导过程中出现低血压的频率以及血管舒张剂的使用频率和剂量。在我院,所有患者均在手术当天停用 ARBs:T组和V组分别有190名和132名患者。第五组患者的背景与使用钙通道阻滞剂的关系更为密切。在同时使用其他降压药、心血管并发症或肾功能方面没有观察到明显差异。麻醉诱导期间平均动脉血压低于 60 mmHg 的时间,T 组明显多于 V 组(11 分钟对 7 分钟,P=0.030)。T组患者使用血管加压剂的比例明显高于V组(74.2%对56.0%,P<0.001):结论:与服用缬沙坦的患者相比,服用替米沙坦的患者在全身麻醉诱导过程中更容易出现低血压,即使在手术当天停药后也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of anesthesiology
Asian journal of anesthesiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Anesthesiology (AJA), launched in 1962, is the official and peer-reviewed publication of the Taiwan Society of Anaesthesiologists. It is published quarterly (March/June/September/December) by Airiti and indexed in EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SIIC Data Bases. AJA accepts submissions from around the world. AJA is the premier open access journal in the field of anaesthesia and its related disciplines of critical care and pain in Asia. The number of Chinese anaesthesiologists has reached more than 60,000 and is still growing. The journal aims to disseminate anaesthesiology research and services for the Chinese community and is now the main anaesthesiology journal for Chinese societies located in Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong and Singapore. AJAcaters to clinicians of all relevant specialties and biomedical scientists working in the areas of anesthesia, critical care medicine and pain management, as well as other related fields (pharmacology, pathology molecular biology, etc). AJA''s editorial team is composed of local and regional experts in the field as well as many leading international experts. Article types accepted include review articles, research papers, short communication, correspondence and images.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Long- Versus Short-Acting Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonists and Hypotension During Anesthesia Induction: A Retrospective Study. Hypovolemic Shock and Changes in Density Spectral Array of BIS During Hepatectomy. Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction: A Review. Practice Algorithm of Rotational Thromboelastometry-Guided (ROTEM-Guided) Bleeding Management in Liver Transplantation. An Occult Cardiac Tamponade: Echocardiographic Diagnosis of Aortic Root Rupture in Infective Endocarditis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1