Sina Dalby, Reza Piri, Ole Graumann, Oke Gerke, Thomas Lund Andersen, Anne-Mette Walsted, Kirsten Risby, Rasmus Gaardskær Nielsen, Anders Linnemann, Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen, Steffen Husby
{"title":"PET/MRI in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease - a prospective accuracy study.","authors":"Sina Dalby, Reza Piri, Ole Graumann, Oke Gerke, Thomas Lund Andersen, Anne-Mette Walsted, Kirsten Risby, Rasmus Gaardskær Nielsen, Anders Linnemann, Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen, Steffen Husby","doi":"10.1111/cpf.12903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cross-sectional imaging supplements endoscopy in detecting disease manifestations in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of PET/MRI in a paediatric population suspected of IBD. This prospective study consecutively included patients aged 8-17 years under diagnostic evaluation for IBD. Forty-three patients underwent a PET/MRI scan and subsequent ileocolonoscopy, of whom 26 patients diagnosed with IBD participated in a follow-up scan, hereof 19 with Crohn's disease (CD), five with Ulcerative colitis and two with unclassified IBD. The results of PET alone, MRI alone, and PET/MRI combined were compared to a reference standard of endoscopy and histopathology. Of the 208 intestinal segments analysed, 109 showed inflammation, and 99 had no inflammation. In the per-segment analysis PET had a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI 0.73-0.93), specificity of 0.59 (95% CI 0.47-0.71), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.73 (95% CI 0.67-0.80). MRI had a sensitivity of 0.52 (95% CI 0.41-0.64), specificity 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.96), and AUROC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.77). PET/MRI had a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI 0.74-0.94), specificity of 0.57 (95% CI 0.44-0.69), and AUROC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.84). At follow-up, PET and MRI scores decreased, and the change in MRI was able to identify patients with a clinical response. The accuracy of the PET/MRI scan in detecting inflammation in the terminal ileum and colon was moderate and not superior to either modality alone. With technological advances and combined reading, PET/MRI may still be valuable in selected cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":10504,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cross-sectional imaging supplements endoscopy in detecting disease manifestations in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of PET/MRI in a paediatric population suspected of IBD. This prospective study consecutively included patients aged 8-17 years under diagnostic evaluation for IBD. Forty-three patients underwent a PET/MRI scan and subsequent ileocolonoscopy, of whom 26 patients diagnosed with IBD participated in a follow-up scan, hereof 19 with Crohn's disease (CD), five with Ulcerative colitis and two with unclassified IBD. The results of PET alone, MRI alone, and PET/MRI combined were compared to a reference standard of endoscopy and histopathology. Of the 208 intestinal segments analysed, 109 showed inflammation, and 99 had no inflammation. In the per-segment analysis PET had a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI 0.73-0.93), specificity of 0.59 (95% CI 0.47-0.71), and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.73 (95% CI 0.67-0.80). MRI had a sensitivity of 0.52 (95% CI 0.41-0.64), specificity 0.89 (95% CI 0.82-0.96), and AUROC of 0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.77). PET/MRI had a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI 0.74-0.94), specificity of 0.57 (95% CI 0.44-0.69), and AUROC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.71-0.84). At follow-up, PET and MRI scores decreased, and the change in MRI was able to identify patients with a clinical response. The accuracy of the PET/MRI scan in detecting inflammation in the terminal ileum and colon was moderate and not superior to either modality alone. With technological advances and combined reading, PET/MRI may still be valuable in selected cases.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging publishes reports on clinical and experimental research pertinent to human physiology in health and disease. The scope of the Journal is very broad, covering all aspects of the regulatory system in the cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary systems with special emphasis on methodological aspects. The focus for the journal is, however, work that has potential clinical relevance. The Journal also features review articles on recent front-line research within these fields of interest.
Covered by the major abstracting services including Current Contents and Science Citation Index, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging plays an important role in providing effective and productive communication among clinical physiologists world-wide.