Effect of Virtual Education on Knowledge and Practice of Critical Care Nurses Regarding the Administration of Drugs Through Enteral Feeding Tubes: A Prospective Randomized Pre-Post Intervention Study.

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Nursing Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000524
Elnaz Sabaghnejad, Naemeh Nikvarz, Monirsadat Nematollahi
{"title":"Effect of Virtual Education on Knowledge and Practice of Critical Care Nurses Regarding the Administration of Drugs Through Enteral Feeding Tubes: A Prospective Randomized Pre-Post Intervention Study.","authors":"Elnaz Sabaghnejad, Naemeh Nikvarz, Monirsadat Nematollahi","doi":"10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A study was conducted to evaluate the effect of virtual education on knowledge and practice of nurses regarding administration of drugs through enteral feeding tubes (EFTs). Sixty nurses working in 4 intensive care units were enrolled. A questionnaire evaluating knowledge and practice of nurses regarding drug administration through EFTs was used. At the pre-intervention stage, all nurses responded to the questionnaire. Then an educational videoclip was provided to the intervention group. One month later, post-intervention stage, both groups answered to the questionnaire again. At the end of the study, the scores of all items in the knowledge domain including medication preparation (mean difference [MD] [95% CI]: 1.11 [0.57; 1.66]), tube flushing (MD [95% CI]: 2.15 [1.59; 2.79]), recognizing drug-drug/drug-feed interactions (MD [95% CI]: 0.57 [0.05; 1.09]), and recognizing dosage forms (MD [95% CI]: 1.51 [0.94; 2.10]) and practice domain including medication preparation (MD [95% CI]: 1.63 [1.04; 2.21]), tube flushing (MD [95% CI]: 1.19 [0.64; 1.74]), and recognizing drug-drug/drug-feed interactions [MD (95% CI): 2.16 (1.53; 2.80)] in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < .05). Education of proper technics of preparation and administration of drugs through EFTs improved knowledge and practice of the participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":10789,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","volume":"47 4","pages":"286-295"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Nursing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CNQ.0000000000000524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A study was conducted to evaluate the effect of virtual education on knowledge and practice of nurses regarding administration of drugs through enteral feeding tubes (EFTs). Sixty nurses working in 4 intensive care units were enrolled. A questionnaire evaluating knowledge and practice of nurses regarding drug administration through EFTs was used. At the pre-intervention stage, all nurses responded to the questionnaire. Then an educational videoclip was provided to the intervention group. One month later, post-intervention stage, both groups answered to the questionnaire again. At the end of the study, the scores of all items in the knowledge domain including medication preparation (mean difference [MD] [95% CI]: 1.11 [0.57; 1.66]), tube flushing (MD [95% CI]: 2.15 [1.59; 2.79]), recognizing drug-drug/drug-feed interactions (MD [95% CI]: 0.57 [0.05; 1.09]), and recognizing dosage forms (MD [95% CI]: 1.51 [0.94; 2.10]) and practice domain including medication preparation (MD [95% CI]: 1.63 [1.04; 2.21]), tube flushing (MD [95% CI]: 1.19 [0.64; 1.74]), and recognizing drug-drug/drug-feed interactions [MD (95% CI): 2.16 (1.53; 2.80)] in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < .05). Education of proper technics of preparation and administration of drugs through EFTs improved knowledge and practice of the participants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟教育对重症监护护士通过肠内喂养管给药的知识和实践的影响:前瞻性随机岗前干预研究》。
本研究旨在评估虚拟教育对护士通过肠道喂食管(EFT)给药的知识和实践的影响。在 4 个重症监护病房工作的 60 名护士参加了这项研究。调查问卷用于评估护士对通过 EFT 给药的认识和实践。在干预前阶段,所有护士都回答了问卷。然后向干预组提供了教育视频短片。一个月后,即干预后阶段,两组护士再次回答问卷。研究结束时,包括药物准备(平均差 [MD] [95% CI]:1.11 [0.57; 1.66])、管道冲洗(MD [95% CI]:2.15 [1.59; 2.79])、识别药物与药物/药物与饲料之间的相互作用(MD [95% CI]:0.57 [0.05; 1.09])和识别剂型(MD [95% CI]:1.51[0.94;2.10])和实践领域包括药物准备(MD [95%CI]:1.63[1.04;2.21])、冲管(MD [95%CI]:1.19[0.64;1.74])和识别药物-药物/药物-饲料相互作用[MD (95%CI):2.16 (1.53;2.80)],干预组明显高于对照组(P.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly
Critical Care Nursing Quarterly CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nursing Quarterly (CCNQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides current practice-oriented information for the continuing education and improved clinical practice of critical care professionals, including nurses, physicians, and allied health care professionals.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Nurses' Perceptions of Handover Practices: A Comparative Study in Different Medical Settings. Care Bundle Approach for Oral Health Maintenance and Reduction of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Cryoanalgesia for Reducing Unconscious Patients' Pain During Arterial Puncture. Developing and Validating a Bundle for Safe Intra-Hospital Transporting of the Critically Ill Patients: Mixed Qualitative Design With Delphi Approach. Effect of the "aSSKINg" Model in Reducing Pressure Ulcer Risk: A Comparative Study Using the Braden Risk Assessment Score.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1