Post-acute COVID-19 outcomes including participant-reported long COVID: amubarvimab/romlusevimab versus placebo in the ACTIV-2 trial.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-08-16 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102787
Teresa H Evering, Carlee Moser, Nikolaus Jilg, Justin Ritz, David A Wohl, Jonathan Z Li, David Margolis, Arzhang Cyrus Javan, Joseph J Eron, Judith S Currier, Eric S Daar, Davey M Smith, Michael D Hughes, Kara W Chew
{"title":"Post-acute COVID-19 outcomes including participant-reported long COVID: amubarvimab/romlusevimab versus placebo in the ACTIV-2 trial.","authors":"Teresa H Evering, Carlee Moser, Nikolaus Jilg, Justin Ritz, David A Wohl, Jonathan Z Li, David Margolis, Arzhang Cyrus Javan, Joseph J Eron, Judith S Currier, Eric S Daar, Davey M Smith, Michael D Hughes, Kara W Chew","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is unknown if early COVID-19 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy can reduce risk of Long COVID. The mAbs amubarvimab/romlusevimab were previously demonstrated to reduce risk of hospitalization/death by 79%. This study assessed the impact of amubarvimab/romlusevimab on late outcomes, including Long COVID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Non-hospitalized high-risk adults within 10 days of COVID-19 symptom onset enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial of amubarvimab/romlusevimab for COVID-19 treatment. Late symptoms, assessed using a participant-completed symptom diary, were a pre-specified exploratory endpoint. The primary outcome for this analysis was the composite of Long COVID by participant self-report (presence of COVID-19 symptoms as recorded in the diary at week 36) or hospitalization or death by week 36. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to address incomplete outcome ascertainment, giving weighted risk ratios (wRR) comparing amubarvimab/romlusevimab to placebo.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Participants received amubarvimab/romlusevimab (n = 390) or placebo (n = 390) between January and July 2021. Median age was 49 years, 52% were female, 18% Black/African American, 49% Hispanic/Latino, and 9% COVID-19-vaccinated at entry. At week 36, 103 (13%) had incomplete outcome ascertainment, and 66 (17%) on amubarvimab/romlusevimab and 92 (24%) on placebo met the primary outcome (wRR = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.93). The difference was driven by fewer hospitalizations/deaths with amubarvimab/romlusevimab (4%) than placebo (13%). Among 652 participants with available diary responses, 53 (16%) on amubarvimab/romlusevimab and 44 (14%) on placebo reported presence of Long COVID.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Amubarvimab/romlusevimab treatment, while highly effective in preventing hospitalizations/deaths, did not reduce risk of Long COVID. Additional interventions are needed to prevent Long COVID.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health. Amubarvimab and romlusevimab supplied by Brii Biosciences.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"75 ","pages":"102787"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11381616/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102787","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is unknown if early COVID-19 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy can reduce risk of Long COVID. The mAbs amubarvimab/romlusevimab were previously demonstrated to reduce risk of hospitalization/death by 79%. This study assessed the impact of amubarvimab/romlusevimab on late outcomes, including Long COVID.

Methods: Non-hospitalized high-risk adults within 10 days of COVID-19 symptom onset enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial of amubarvimab/romlusevimab for COVID-19 treatment. Late symptoms, assessed using a participant-completed symptom diary, were a pre-specified exploratory endpoint. The primary outcome for this analysis was the composite of Long COVID by participant self-report (presence of COVID-19 symptoms as recorded in the diary at week 36) or hospitalization or death by week 36. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to address incomplete outcome ascertainment, giving weighted risk ratios (wRR) comparing amubarvimab/romlusevimab to placebo.

Findings: Participants received amubarvimab/romlusevimab (n = 390) or placebo (n = 390) between January and July 2021. Median age was 49 years, 52% were female, 18% Black/African American, 49% Hispanic/Latino, and 9% COVID-19-vaccinated at entry. At week 36, 103 (13%) had incomplete outcome ascertainment, and 66 (17%) on amubarvimab/romlusevimab and 92 (24%) on placebo met the primary outcome (wRR = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.93). The difference was driven by fewer hospitalizations/deaths with amubarvimab/romlusevimab (4%) than placebo (13%). Among 652 participants with available diary responses, 53 (16%) on amubarvimab/romlusevimab and 44 (14%) on placebo reported presence of Long COVID.

Interpretation: Amubarvimab/romlusevimab treatment, while highly effective in preventing hospitalizations/deaths, did not reduce risk of Long COVID. Additional interventions are needed to prevent Long COVID.

Funding: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health. Amubarvimab and romlusevimab supplied by Brii Biosciences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性 COVID-19 后的结果,包括参与者报告的长 COVID:ACTIV-2 试验中的阿穆巴单抗/罗卢舍单抗与安慰剂对比。
背景:早期 COVID-19 单克隆抗体 (mAb) 治疗能否降低长 COVID 的风险尚不清楚。mAb amubarvimab/romlusevimab 曾被证实可将住院/死亡风险降低 79%。本研究评估了amubarvimab/romlusevimab对后期结局(包括Long COVID)的影响:在COVID-19症状出现10天内的非住院高危成人参加了阿穆巴单抗/罗卢舍单抗治疗COVID-19的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照2/3期试验。晚期症状采用参与者填写的症状日记进行评估,是预先指定的探索性终点。该分析的主要结果是参与者自我报告的长COVID(第36周时日记中记录的COVID-19症状)或第36周时住院或死亡的复合结果。反概率加权法(IPW)用于解决结果确认不完整的问题,得出了阿穆巴单抗/罗卢舍单抗与安慰剂的加权风险比(wRR):2021年1月至7月期间,参与者接受了amubarvimab/romlusevimab(n = 390)或安慰剂(n = 390)治疗。中位年龄为49岁,52%为女性,18%为黑人/非洲裔美国人,49%为西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人,9%在入组时接种过COVID-19疫苗。第36周时,103人(13%)的结果未完全确定,66人(17%)服用阿穆巴单抗/罗卢舍单抗,92人(24%)服用安慰剂,均达到主要结果(wRR = 0.70,95% 置信区间 (CI) 0.53-0.93)。造成这一差异的原因是阿穆巴单抗/罗卢舍单抗的住院/死亡人数(4%)少于安慰剂(13%)。在652名有日记回复的参试者中,53名(16%)服用阿穆巴单抗/罗卢舍单抗的参试者和44名(14%)服用安慰剂的参试者报告存在Long COVID:阿穆巴单抗/罗卢舍单抗治疗虽然在预防住院/死亡方面非常有效,但并没有降低长COVID的风险。需要采取更多干预措施来预防长COVID:美国国立卫生研究院国家过敏与传染病研究所。Amubarvimab和romlusevimab由Brii Biosciences提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Erythema multiforme. Impact of sedative and appetite-increasing properties on the apparent antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and amitriptyline: an item-based, patient-level meta-analysis. The hockey fans in training intervention for men with overweight or obesity: a pragmatic cluster randomised trial. Prognosticating gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: from FIGO 2000 to future models. Deep learning model for automated diagnosis of moyamoya disease based on magnetic resonance angiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1