Comparative Effectiveness of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin and Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel for Treatment-naïve Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY European urology focus Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.006
Kaushik P Kolanukuduru, Reuben Ben-David, Sarah Lidagoster, Mohammed Almoflihi, Neeraja Tillu, Ahmed Eraky, Parissa Alerasool, Nikhil Waigankar, Kyrollis Attalla, Reza Mehrazin, Peter Wiklund, John P Sfakianos
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin and Sequential Intravesical Gemcitabine and Docetaxel for Treatment-naïve Intermediate-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.","authors":"Kaushik P Kolanukuduru, Reuben Ben-David, Sarah Lidagoster, Mohammed Almoflihi, Neeraja Tillu, Ahmed Eraky, Parissa Alerasool, Nikhil Waigankar, Kyrollis Attalla, Reza Mehrazin, Peter Wiklund, John P Sfakianos","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Sequential intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel (Gem/Doce) has emerged as a potential alternative to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for the treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Our aim was to determine the comparative effectiveness of BCG and Gem/Doce for patients with intermediate-risk (IR) NMIBC, composed mainly of high-grade (HG) Ta disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with IR-NMIBC who received either BCG or Gem/Doce during 2013-2023 were included. Maintenance BCG (as per the Southwest Oncology Group protocol) and monthly Gem/Doce maintenance for 1 yr were offered to patients with no evidence of recurrence after induction. Routine surveillance with cystoscopy was performed according to the American Urological Association guidelines. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess high-grade and any-grade recurrence-free survival (RFS). Cox regression analysis was performed to find predictors of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Of 483 patients, 127 had IR-NMIBC; 66 patients received BCG and 61 received Gem/Doce. Median age was 69 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 61-76) for the BCG group and 72 yr (IQR 62-76) for the Gem/Doce group. Median follow-up was 53.1 mo (IQR 25.3-71.2) for the BCG group and 20.2 mo (IQR 8.28-33.1) for the Gem/Doce group. The 2-yr high-grade RFS rates for primary high-grade tumors for BCG versus Gem/Doce groups were 81% versus 61%, with corresponding any-grade RFS rates of 60% versus 41%. Induction with Gem/Doce predicted any-grade recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.2) and high-grade recurrence for primary high-grade tumors (HR 3.4 95% CI 1.27-9.13), while receipt of maintenance therapy decreased the risk of any-grade recurrence (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.22-0.72). This study is limited by its retrospective design.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>For patients with IR-NMIBC, BCG was associated with superior any-grade RFS and high-grade RFS for primary high-grade tumors. Maintenance therapy was associated with better RFS when receiving Gem/Doce. Standardization and longer maintenance therapy protocols should be considered for Gem/Doce treatment.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>We compared outcomes for patients who received two different in-bladder treatments for intermediate-risk bladder cancer. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) led to better outcomes than gemcitabine + docetaxel (Gem/Doce). Monthly maintenance therapy improved recurrence-free survival for patients who received Gem/Doce. We conclude that maintenance therapy is essential for patients receiving Gem/Doce to avoid bladder cancer recurrence after treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.09.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Sequential intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel (Gem/Doce) has emerged as a potential alternative to bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) for the treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Our aim was to determine the comparative effectiveness of BCG and Gem/Doce for patients with intermediate-risk (IR) NMIBC, composed mainly of high-grade (HG) Ta disease.

Methods: Patients with IR-NMIBC who received either BCG or Gem/Doce during 2013-2023 were included. Maintenance BCG (as per the Southwest Oncology Group protocol) and monthly Gem/Doce maintenance for 1 yr were offered to patients with no evidence of recurrence after induction. Routine surveillance with cystoscopy was performed according to the American Urological Association guidelines. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess high-grade and any-grade recurrence-free survival (RFS). Cox regression analysis was performed to find predictors of recurrence.

Key findings and limitations: Of 483 patients, 127 had IR-NMIBC; 66 patients received BCG and 61 received Gem/Doce. Median age was 69 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 61-76) for the BCG group and 72 yr (IQR 62-76) for the Gem/Doce group. Median follow-up was 53.1 mo (IQR 25.3-71.2) for the BCG group and 20.2 mo (IQR 8.28-33.1) for the Gem/Doce group. The 2-yr high-grade RFS rates for primary high-grade tumors for BCG versus Gem/Doce groups were 81% versus 61%, with corresponding any-grade RFS rates of 60% versus 41%. Induction with Gem/Doce predicted any-grade recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.2) and high-grade recurrence for primary high-grade tumors (HR 3.4 95% CI 1.27-9.13), while receipt of maintenance therapy decreased the risk of any-grade recurrence (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.22-0.72). This study is limited by its retrospective design.

Conclusions and clinical implications: For patients with IR-NMIBC, BCG was associated with superior any-grade RFS and high-grade RFS for primary high-grade tumors. Maintenance therapy was associated with better RFS when receiving Gem/Doce. Standardization and longer maintenance therapy protocols should be considered for Gem/Doce treatment.

Patient summary: We compared outcomes for patients who received two different in-bladder treatments for intermediate-risk bladder cancer. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) led to better outcomes than gemcitabine + docetaxel (Gem/Doce). Monthly maintenance therapy improved recurrence-free survival for patients who received Gem/Doce. We conclude that maintenance therapy is essential for patients receiving Gem/Doce to avoid bladder cancer recurrence after treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卡介苗与序贯静脉注射吉西他滨和多西他赛治疗无效中危非肌浸润性膀胱癌的疗效比较。
背景和目的:膀胱内序贯吉西他滨/多西他赛(Gem/Doce)已成为卡介苗(BCG)治疗非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的潜在替代疗法。我们的目的是确定卡介苗和Gem/Doce对中危(IR)NMIBC(主要由高级别(HG)Ta疾病组成)患者的疗效比较:纳入2013-2023年间接受过卡介苗或Gem/Doce治疗的IR-NMIBC患者。对诱导后无复发证据的患者提供卡介苗维持治疗(根据西南肿瘤学组方案)和每月一次的 Gem/Doce 维持治疗,为期 1 年。根据美国泌尿外科协会指南,对患者进行膀胱镜常规监测。采用Kaplan-Meier法评估高级别和任何级别无复发生存期(RFS)。进行了Cox回归分析,以寻找复发的预测因素:在483名患者中,127人患有IR-NMIBC;66人接受了卡介苗治疗,61人接受了Gem/Doce治疗。卡介苗组的中位年龄为69岁(四分位距[IQR]61-76),Gem/Doce组的中位年龄为72岁(四分位距[IQR]62-76)。卡介苗组的中位随访时间为 53.1 个月(IQR 25.3-71.2),Gem/Doce 组为 20.2 个月(IQR 8.28-33.1)。BCG组和Gem/Doce组原发性高级别肿瘤的2年高级别RFS率分别为81%和61%,相应的任何级别RFS率分别为60%和41%。Gem/Doce诱导可预测任何级别复发(危险比 [HR] 1.87,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.1-3.2)和原发性高级别肿瘤的高级别复发(HR 3.4 95% CI 1.27-9.13),而接受维持治疗可降低任何级别复发的风险(HR 0.4,95% CI 0.22-0.72)。这项研究因其回顾性设计而受到限制:结论与临床意义:对于IR-NMIBC患者,卡介苗与较好的任意级别RFS和原发性高级别肿瘤的高级别RFS相关。接受 Gem/Doce 治疗时,维持治疗与较好的 RFS 相关。患者摘要:我们比较了接受两种不同膀胱内治疗的中危膀胱癌患者的疗效。卡介苗(BCG)的疗效优于吉西他滨+多西他赛(Gem/Doce)。每月一次的维持治疗提高了接受吉西他滨/多西他赛治疗的患者的无复发生存率。我们的结论是,接受吉西他滨/多西他赛治疗的患者必须接受维持治疗,以避免治疗后膀胱癌复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Better Oncological Outcomes After Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography-guided Salvage Radiotherapy Following Prostatectomy. Microbiome-based Therapeutics: Cutting-edge Innovation. Trimodality Therapy Versus Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Matched Cohort Studies. Role of Microbiome Testing in Everyday Clinical Urology. Oncological Outcomes Following Robotic Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer: A Worldwide Multicenter Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1