首页 > 最新文献

European urology focus最新文献

英文 中文
WATER III: A Prospective, Partially Randomized Trial of Aquablation Therapy Versus Transurethral Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. WATER III:一项前瞻性、部分随机试验,比较水溶疗法与经尿道前列腺激光去核术治疗下尿路症状。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.006
Manuel Ritter, Johannes Stein, Neil Barber, Jas Kalsi, Rick Popert, Edward Bass, Robert Németh, Matthias Schmid, Simon Gloger, Burkhard Ubrig, Arkadiusz Miernik, Christian Gratzke

Background and objective: Aquablation and laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) are treatments for alleviation of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) that have not yet been directly compared in a prospective randomized trial. This study was designed to evaluate these treatments in terms of LUTS improvement and safety in men with large prostates.

Methods: WATER III is an investigator-initiated, international, multicenter, nonblinded, prospective noninferiority trial that includes randomized and nonrandomized participants. Eligible patients had moderate to severe LUTS and a large prostate volume (80-180 ml). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) from baseline to 3 mo. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥2 or persistent CD grade 1 complications that had not resolved by 3 mo. Bayesian analyses were used to assess noninferiority.

Key findings and limitations: A total of 202 men were enrolled in the study, of whom 186 underwent surgery (98 Aquablation, 88 LEP). At 3 mo, data were available for 170 patients, including 66 randomized and 104 nonrandomized men. Both treatments showed similar mean IPSS improvement at 3 mo: -12.9 ± 6.9 with Aquablation versus -13.1 ± 7.5 with LEP, with an estimated difference of 0.93 (95% credible interval [CrI] -1.48 to 3.53) and noninferiority probability of >0.999. The incidence of CD grade ≥2/persistent grade 1 complications was 40.8% in the Aquablation group versus 56.8% in the LEP, with an estimated difference of -9.4% (95%CrI -31.8% to 12.9%; noninferiority probability 0.952). Retrograde ejaculation was less frequent after Aquablation (14.8% vs 77.1%; p < 0.001). Persistent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) was absent following Aquablation versus 9.3% after LEP (p < 0.05).

Conclusions and clinical implications: Aquablation demonstrated noninferior short-term LUTS relief and similar safety compared to LEP, with superior ejaculation preservation and avoidance of SUI in short-term follow-up.

背景和目的:水溶消融术和前列腺激光去核术(LEP)是缓解下尿路症状(LUTS)的两种治疗方法,尚未在前瞻性随机试验中进行直接比较。本研究旨在评估这些治疗方法在大前列腺患者LUTS改善和安全性方面的作用。方法:WATER III是一项研究者发起的、国际性、多中心、非盲法、前瞻性非劣效性试验,包括随机和非随机参与者。符合条件的患者有中度至重度LUTS和大前列腺体积(80-180 ml)。主要疗效终点是国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)从基线到3个月的变化。主要安全性终点是Clavien-Dindo (CD)≥2级或持续CD 1级并发症的发生率,这些并发症在3个月后仍未解决。贝叶斯分析用于评估非劣效性。主要发现和局限性:共有202名男性参与了这项研究,其中186人接受了手术(98人接受了水消融,88人接受了LEP)。在3个月时,170名患者的数据可用,包括66名随机男性和104名非随机男性。两种治疗在3个月时显示出相似的平均IPSS改善:水消融组为-12.9±6.9,LEP组为-13.1±7.5,估计差异为0.93(95%可信区间[CrI] -1.48至3.53),非效性概率为>0.999。水消融组CD≥2级/持续1级并发症发生率为40.8%,LEP组为56.8%,估计差异为-9.4% (95%CrI -31.8%至12.9%;非劣效性概率为0.952)。结论和临床意义:与LEP相比,水溶消融术显示出良好的短期LUTS缓解和相似的安全性,在短期随访中具有良好的射精保存和避免SUI。
{"title":"WATER III: A Prospective, Partially Randomized Trial of Aquablation Therapy Versus Transurethral Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.","authors":"Manuel Ritter, Johannes Stein, Neil Barber, Jas Kalsi, Rick Popert, Edward Bass, Robert Németh, Matthias Schmid, Simon Gloger, Burkhard Ubrig, Arkadiusz Miernik, Christian Gratzke","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Aquablation and laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP) are treatments for alleviation of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) that have not yet been directly compared in a prospective randomized trial. This study was designed to evaluate these treatments in terms of LUTS improvement and safety in men with large prostates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>WATER III is an investigator-initiated, international, multicenter, nonblinded, prospective noninferiority trial that includes randomized and nonrandomized participants. Eligible patients had moderate to severe LUTS and a large prostate volume (80-180 ml). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) from baseline to 3 mo. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥2 or persistent CD grade 1 complications that had not resolved by 3 mo. Bayesian analyses were used to assess noninferiority.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>A total of 202 men were enrolled in the study, of whom 186 underwent surgery (98 Aquablation, 88 LEP). At 3 mo, data were available for 170 patients, including 66 randomized and 104 nonrandomized men. Both treatments showed similar mean IPSS improvement at 3 mo: -12.9 ± 6.9 with Aquablation versus -13.1 ± 7.5 with LEP, with an estimated difference of 0.93 (95% credible interval [CrI] -1.48 to 3.53) and noninferiority probability of >0.999. The incidence of CD grade ≥2/persistent grade 1 complications was 40.8% in the Aquablation group versus 56.8% in the LEP, with an estimated difference of -9.4% (95%CrI -31.8% to 12.9%; noninferiority probability 0.952). Retrograde ejaculation was less frequent after Aquablation (14.8% vs 77.1%; p < 0.001). Persistent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) was absent following Aquablation versus 9.3% after LEP (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Aquablation demonstrated noninferior short-term LUTS relief and similar safety compared to LEP, with superior ejaculation preservation and avoidance of SUI in short-term follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146118294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reply to Ingmar Wolff, Maximilian Burger, Sabine Brookman-May, and Matthias May's Letter to the Editor re: Re: Mattia Longoni, Leonardo Quarta, Donato Cannoletta, et al. Long-term Functional Outcomes and Decision Regret after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Experienced Surgeon Series. Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.014. 回复Ingmar Wolff, Maximilian Burger, Sabine Brookman-May和Matthias May给编辑的信re: re: Mattia Longoni, Leonardo Quarta, Donato Cannoletta等。机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的长期功能结果和决策后悔:一个有经验的外科医生系列。Eur url Focus。在出版社。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.014。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.009
Mattia Longoni, Giorgio Gandaglia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi
{"title":"Reply to Ingmar Wolff, Maximilian Burger, Sabine Brookman-May, and Matthias May's Letter to the Editor re: Re: Mattia Longoni, Leonardo Quarta, Donato Cannoletta, et al. Long-term Functional Outcomes and Decision Regret after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Experienced Surgeon Series. Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.014.","authors":"Mattia Longoni, Giorgio Gandaglia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Shared Decision-making in Urology: The SHINE-URO Consensus Framework. 泌尿外科共同决策:SHINE-URO共识框架。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.008
Michael van Balken, Sara MacLennan, Rodolfo Montironi, Hendrik van Poppel, Markos Karavitakis, Corinne Tillier, Mary Lynne van Poelgeest-Pomfret, Erik Briers, Jane Meijlink, Alex Filicevas, Claudia Ungarelli, Robert Cornes, Antonella Cardone, Evangelos Liatsikos, James Caldwell, Robert Greene, Jacqueline Daly, Anna de Santis, Wendy Yared, Eamonn Rogers

Shared decision-making (SDM) is recognised as a cornerstone of patient-centred care, yet progress in embedding SDM in urology has been inconsistent. The European Association of Urology (EAU) Patient Office convened urologists, nurses, and patient advocates at two consensus meetings (Paris, France, March 2024; Rome, Italy, November 2024) to define core SDM principles and identify barriers to implementation. The outcome was the SHINE-URO framework, comprising six principles: open discussion of harms and benefits; exploration of patient values and goals; provision of clear and guideline-based information; creation of safe environments for sensitive topics; addressing misinformation and patient skills; and offering information before consultations. Key barriers to implementation included time constraints; accessibility and inclusion challenges; professional role concerns; underuse of "no treatment" as an option; and insufficient involvement of family members and caregivers. This multidisciplinary collaboration has delivered a consensus definition of SDM in urology and a roadmap for its implementation. Adoption of SHINE-URO in clinical practice requires system-level support, resources, and training to ensure equitable, patient-centred care. PATIENT SUMMARY: We developed a new framework for shared decision-making in urology called SHINE-URO. This framework focuses on clear information, patient values, and preparation before consultations. This will help patients in making informed choices about their care together with their doctors.

共同决策(SDM)被认为是以患者为中心的护理的基石,但在泌尿外科嵌入SDM的进展一直不一致。欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)患者办公室召开了两次共识会议(2024年3月,法国巴黎;2024年11月,意大利罗马),召集泌尿科医生、护士和患者倡导者,以确定SDM的核心原则并确定实施的障碍。结果是SHINE-URO框架,包括六项原则:公开讨论危害和益处;患者价值观和目标的探索;提供明确和基于指南的信息;为敏感话题创造安全的环境;解决错误信息和耐心技能;在咨询前提供信息。实施的主要障碍包括时间限制;无障碍和包容性挑战;职业角色关注;未充分使用“不治疗”作为一种选择;家庭成员和照顾者参与不足。这一多学科合作提供了泌尿外科SDM的共识定义和实施路线图。在临床实践中采用SHINE-URO需要系统级的支持、资源和培训,以确保公平、以患者为中心的护理。患者总结:我们开发了一个新的泌尿外科共同决策框架,称为SHINE-URO。该框架侧重于明确的信息、患者价值和会诊前的准备。这将有助于患者与医生一起对他们的护理做出明智的选择。
{"title":"Shared Decision-making in Urology: The SHINE-URO Consensus Framework.","authors":"Michael van Balken, Sara MacLennan, Rodolfo Montironi, Hendrik van Poppel, Markos Karavitakis, Corinne Tillier, Mary Lynne van Poelgeest-Pomfret, Erik Briers, Jane Meijlink, Alex Filicevas, Claudia Ungarelli, Robert Cornes, Antonella Cardone, Evangelos Liatsikos, James Caldwell, Robert Greene, Jacqueline Daly, Anna de Santis, Wendy Yared, Eamonn Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shared decision-making (SDM) is recognised as a cornerstone of patient-centred care, yet progress in embedding SDM in urology has been inconsistent. The European Association of Urology (EAU) Patient Office convened urologists, nurses, and patient advocates at two consensus meetings (Paris, France, March 2024; Rome, Italy, November 2024) to define core SDM principles and identify barriers to implementation. The outcome was the SHINE-URO framework, comprising six principles: open discussion of harms and benefits; exploration of patient values and goals; provision of clear and guideline-based information; creation of safe environments for sensitive topics; addressing misinformation and patient skills; and offering information before consultations. Key barriers to implementation included time constraints; accessibility and inclusion challenges; professional role concerns; underuse of \"no treatment\" as an option; and insufficient involvement of family members and caregivers. This multidisciplinary collaboration has delivered a consensus definition of SDM in urology and a roadmap for its implementation. Adoption of SHINE-URO in clinical practice requires system-level support, resources, and training to ensure equitable, patient-centred care. PATIENT SUMMARY: We developed a new framework for shared decision-making in urology called SHINE-URO. This framework focuses on clear information, patient values, and preparation before consultations. This will help patients in making informed choices about their care together with their doctors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146085114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Octogenarians: 16-year Experience in a High-volume Center. 钬激光前列腺摘除在老年患者中的应用:在一个大容量中心16年的经验。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.002
Dennis Wielander, Johanna Junge, Friedrich Otto Hartung, Lukas Lusuardi, Thomas R W Herrmann, Mario Zacharias, Karin Lehrich, Jonas Herrmann

Background and objective: The increasing prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia leads to an ever growing number of surgeries in elderly patients, despite limited data on perioperative outcomes. The objective of this study was to analyze perioperative outcomes in patients older than 80 yr undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 12 346 cases of HoLEP from 2008 to 2024 was conducted, identifying 1821 octogenarians. Propensity score matching was performed based on the following parameters: intake of anticoagulants, presence of a urinary catheter on the day of surgery, and prostate size. Perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications of a total of 1519 matched datasets were analyzed.

Key findings and limitations: In the unmatched population, patients older than 80 yr had larger prostates, took anticoagulants more often, and were more likely to have a urinary catheter at admission compared with younger patients (p < 0.001). After matching, these variables were well adjusted in both groups. Operating and catheterization times did not differ between both groups. The risk of a failed first voiding trial was significantly higher in octogenarians (12% vs 6.6%; p < 0.001) and led to a higher catheterization rate at discharge in the octogenarian group. No statistical difference was seen in other postoperative complications. Limitations are the retrospective study design and concomitant selection bias.

Conclusions and clinical implications: Our data indicate that HoLEP is safe in patients older than 80 yr and perioperative outcomes are generally comparable with those of younger patients. Octogenarians had a significantly higher incidence of a failed first voiding trial, which should be considered in postoperative management.

背景与目的:尽管有关围手术期预后的数据有限,但良性前列腺增生的患病率不断上升,导致老年患者的手术数量不断增加。本研究的目的是分析80岁以上接受钬激光前列腺摘除(HoLEP)患者的围手术期预后。方法:回顾性分析2008 ~ 2024年12 346例HoLEP病例,其中80多岁老人1821例。根据以下参数进行倾向评分匹配:抗凝血剂的摄入、手术当天是否有导尿管、前列腺大小。分析1519组匹配数据的围手术期结局和术后并发症。主要发现和局限性:在未匹配的人群中,与年轻患者相比,80岁以上的患者前列腺较大,更经常使用抗凝剂,入院时更有可能使用导尿管(p结论和临床意义:我们的数据表明,HoLEP对80岁以上的患者是安全的,围手术期结果与年轻患者大致相当。80多岁患者首次排尿失败的发生率明显较高,这应在术后处理中予以考虑。
{"title":"Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Octogenarians: 16-year Experience in a High-volume Center.","authors":"Dennis Wielander, Johanna Junge, Friedrich Otto Hartung, Lukas Lusuardi, Thomas R W Herrmann, Mario Zacharias, Karin Lehrich, Jonas Herrmann","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The increasing prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia leads to an ever growing number of surgeries in elderly patients, despite limited data on perioperative outcomes. The objective of this study was to analyze perioperative outcomes in patients older than 80 yr undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 12 346 cases of HoLEP from 2008 to 2024 was conducted, identifying 1821 octogenarians. Propensity score matching was performed based on the following parameters: intake of anticoagulants, presence of a urinary catheter on the day of surgery, and prostate size. Perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications of a total of 1519 matched datasets were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>In the unmatched population, patients older than 80 yr had larger prostates, took anticoagulants more often, and were more likely to have a urinary catheter at admission compared with younger patients (p < 0.001). After matching, these variables were well adjusted in both groups. Operating and catheterization times did not differ between both groups. The risk of a failed first voiding trial was significantly higher in octogenarians (12% vs 6.6%; p < 0.001) and led to a higher catheterization rate at discharge in the octogenarian group. No statistical difference was seen in other postoperative complications. Limitations are the retrospective study design and concomitant selection bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Our data indicate that HoLEP is safe in patients older than 80 yr and perioperative outcomes are generally comparable with those of younger patients. Octogenarians had a significantly higher incidence of a failed first voiding trial, which should be considered in postoperative management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146085164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Cancer Detection Between Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsy in an Active Surveillance Cohort. 主动监测队列中经直肠和经会阴前列腺活检检测癌症的比较。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.10.004
Sunny B Nalavenkata, Amy L Tin, Chris D Gaffney, Nicole Liso, Jonathan Fainberg, Manish I Patel, Andrew J Vickers, Behfar Ehdaie

Background and objective: Transperineal (TP) prostate biopsy is increasingly favored over the transrectal (TR) approach because of a lower risk of infection, but comparative data on cancer detection remain limited. We analyzed a large institutional cohort to compare detection rates and disease location between the TP and TR approaches.

Methods: We included all men on active surveillance undergoing prostate biopsy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center during the 26-mo transition from TR to TP. Data included demographics, biopsy method, histopathology, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. The primary outcome was detection of high-grade cancer (Gleason grade group ≥2). Multivariable logistic regression was adjusted for clinical and imaging variables. Clustered standard errors were used to account for repeat biopsies.

Key findings and limitations: We identified 1387 biopsies performed in 1304 patients from January 2020 to February 2023. Among all biopsies, 522 (38%) contained high-grade cancer and 602 (43%) contained grade group 1 disease. The empirical rate of high-grade cancer detection was 39% with TP versus 37% with TR biopsy (adjusted odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.66-1.10; p = 0.2). TP biopsy had a higher yield for high-grade anterior disease in comparison to TR biopsy (21% vs 9%; p < 0.001) but a lower yield for high-grade posterior disease (28% vs 34%; p = 0.044). Stratification by Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score on MRI revealed consistent detection patterns across biopsy approaches when assessing disease location.

Conclusions and clinical implications: We found no significant difference in the overall detection rate for high-grade cancer between the TR and TP approaches, but there was some evidence of differences by tumor location, with TP biopsy better in sampling anterior tumors, and TR biopsy favoring posterior detection. These findings support the need for further studies, including randomized trials incorporating MRI and detailed location data, to clarify differences between the biopsy approaches in detection rates for different anatomic locations.

背景和目的:由于感染风险较低,经会阴(TP)前列腺活检越来越受到经直肠(TR)入路的青睐,但在癌症检测方面的比较数据仍然有限。我们分析了一个大型机构队列,比较TP和TR方法的检出率和疾病位置。方法:我们纳入了所有在纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心接受主动监测的男性,在从TR到TP过渡的26个月期间接受前列腺活检。数据包括人口统计学、活检方法、组织病理学和磁共振成像(MRI)结果。主要终点是检测到高级别肿瘤(Gleason分级组≥2)。对临床和影像学变量进行多变量logistic回归校正。聚类标准误差用于解释重复活检。主要发现和局限性:我们确定了2020年1月至2023年2月期间在1304名患者中进行的1387次活检。在所有活检中,522例(38%)为高级别癌症,602例(43%)为1级组疾病。TP组高级别肿瘤的经验检出率为39%,TR组为37%(校正优势比0.86,95%可信区间0.66-1.10;p = 0.2)。结论和临床意义:我们发现TR和TP入路对高级别肿瘤的总体检出率没有显著差异,但有证据表明肿瘤位置存在差异,TP活检更适合前路肿瘤取样,而TR活检更适合后路检测。这些发现支持了进一步研究的需要,包括结合MRI和详细位置数据的随机试验,以澄清不同解剖位置活检方法在检出率上的差异。
{"title":"Comparison of Cancer Detection Between Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsy in an Active Surveillance Cohort.","authors":"Sunny B Nalavenkata, Amy L Tin, Chris D Gaffney, Nicole Liso, Jonathan Fainberg, Manish I Patel, Andrew J Vickers, Behfar Ehdaie","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.10.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.10.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Transperineal (TP) prostate biopsy is increasingly favored over the transrectal (TR) approach because of a lower risk of infection, but comparative data on cancer detection remain limited. We analyzed a large institutional cohort to compare detection rates and disease location between the TP and TR approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all men on active surveillance undergoing prostate biopsy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center during the 26-mo transition from TR to TP. Data included demographics, biopsy method, histopathology, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. The primary outcome was detection of high-grade cancer (Gleason grade group ≥2). Multivariable logistic regression was adjusted for clinical and imaging variables. Clustered standard errors were used to account for repeat biopsies.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>We identified 1387 biopsies performed in 1304 patients from January 2020 to February 2023. Among all biopsies, 522 (38%) contained high-grade cancer and 602 (43%) contained grade group 1 disease. The empirical rate of high-grade cancer detection was 39% with TP versus 37% with TR biopsy (adjusted odds ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.66-1.10; p = 0.2). TP biopsy had a higher yield for high-grade anterior disease in comparison to TR biopsy (21% vs 9%; p < 0.001) but a lower yield for high-grade posterior disease (28% vs 34%; p = 0.044). Stratification by Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score on MRI revealed consistent detection patterns across biopsy approaches when assessing disease location.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>We found no significant difference in the overall detection rate for high-grade cancer between the TR and TP approaches, but there was some evidence of differences by tumor location, with TP biopsy better in sampling anterior tumors, and TR biopsy favoring posterior detection. These findings support the need for further studies, including randomized trials incorporating MRI and detailed location data, to clarify differences between the biopsy approaches in detection rates for different anatomic locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146043729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mortality from Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urology Endourology. 经皮肾镜取石术的死亡率:来自欧洲泌尿外科协会的系统综述。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.004
Nicholas L Harrison, Sohani N Dassanayake, Gabriel Z Heppenstall-Harris, Andreas Skolarikos, Arun Chawla, Evangelos Liatsikos, Guohua Zeng, Arman Tsaturyan, Theodoros Tokas, Selcuk Guven, Bhaskar K Somani

Background and objective: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a common urological procedure recommended as first-line treatment for large renal calculi. This systematic review aimed to determine the mortality associated with PCNL in managing kidney stone disease (KSD).

Methods: In line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a literature search was conducted across Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. The inclusion criteria included English articles of adult and paediatric patients that reported on mortality from PCNL. The extracted data included patient demographics, comorbidities, number of mortalities, and cause of mortality.

Key findings and limitations: Sixty-five articles were included, which reported on 634 844 patients over a time period spanning from 1983 to 2024. A total of 2777 mortalities were identified. The overall weighted proportion mortality rate for adult studies, excluding selected patient cohorts, was 0.24%. The overall weighted proportion paediatric mortality rate was 0.6%, and mortality rates for other specific patient subgroups varied. Where the cause of death was reported, the most common causes of death in patients were sepsis (35.6%), myocardial infarction (23.3%), haemorrhage (12.2%), and pulmonary embolism (11.1%).

Conclusions and clinical implications: Mortality rates from PCNL have remained stable and low over the lifetime of the procedure, with a slight reduction in reported mortality rates over time, despite increasing prevalence of KSD and patient comorbidities. Reporting of mortalities from PCNL has increased in recent years, with the most common causes of mortality identified being sepsis, myocardial infarction, and haemorrhage. Careful patient selection, with the identification and mitigation of risk factors, is vital in reducing the risk of mortality from PCNL.

背景与目的:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是一种常见的泌尿外科手术,被推荐作为大肾结石的一线治疗方法。本系统综述旨在确定PCNL治疗肾结石疾病(KSD)的相关死亡率。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,在Medline、Embase、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆进行文献检索。纳入标准包括报告PCNL死亡率的成人和儿科患者的英文文章。提取的数据包括患者人口统计学、合并症、死亡人数和死亡原因。主要发现和局限性:纳入65篇文章,报告了1983年至2024年期间634844名患者。共有2777人死亡。成人研究的总加权比例死亡率(不包括选定的患者队列)为0.24%。儿童死亡率的总体加权比例为0.6%,其他特定患者亚组的死亡率各不相同。在报告的死亡原因中,最常见的死亡原因是败血症(35.6%)、心肌梗死(23.3%)、出血(12.2%)和肺栓塞(11.1%)。结论和临床意义:PCNL的死亡率在整个手术过程中保持稳定和低水平,尽管KSD和患者合并症的患病率增加,但随着时间的推移,报告的死亡率略有下降。近年来,PCNL的死亡报告有所增加,最常见的死亡原因是败血症、心肌梗死和出血。仔细选择患者,识别和减轻风险因素,对于降低PCNL的死亡风险至关重要。
{"title":"Mortality from Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urology Endourology.","authors":"Nicholas L Harrison, Sohani N Dassanayake, Gabriel Z Heppenstall-Harris, Andreas Skolarikos, Arun Chawla, Evangelos Liatsikos, Guohua Zeng, Arman Tsaturyan, Theodoros Tokas, Selcuk Guven, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.004","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a common urological procedure recommended as first-line treatment for large renal calculi. This systematic review aimed to determine the mortality associated with PCNL in managing kidney stone disease (KSD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a literature search was conducted across Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. The inclusion criteria included English articles of adult and paediatric patients that reported on mortality from PCNL. The extracted data included patient demographics, comorbidities, number of mortalities, and cause of mortality.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Sixty-five articles were included, which reported on 634 844 patients over a time period spanning from 1983 to 2024. A total of 2777 mortalities were identified. The overall weighted proportion mortality rate for adult studies, excluding selected patient cohorts, was 0.24%. The overall weighted proportion paediatric mortality rate was 0.6%, and mortality rates for other specific patient subgroups varied. Where the cause of death was reported, the most common causes of death in patients were sepsis (35.6%), myocardial infarction (23.3%), haemorrhage (12.2%), and pulmonary embolism (11.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Mortality rates from PCNL have remained stable and low over the lifetime of the procedure, with a slight reduction in reported mortality rates over time, despite increasing prevalence of KSD and patient comorbidities. Reporting of mortalities from PCNL has increased in recent years, with the most common causes of mortality identified being sepsis, myocardial infarction, and haemorrhage. Careful patient selection, with the identification and mitigation of risk factors, is vital in reducing the risk of mortality from PCNL.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146040791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Future of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Towards a Molecular-Digital Paradigm for Personalized Management. 非肌肉侵袭性膀胱癌的未来:迈向个性化管理的分子-数字范式。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-22 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.005
Pierre-Etienne Gabriel, Evanguelos Xylinas

The management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is undergoing a major paradigm shift driven by molecular biomarkers, artificial intelligence (AI), and a better understanding of the tumor microenvironment and bladder microbiome. Traditional risk stratification based on stage and grade fails to capture the biological heterogeneity of NMIBC and its variable clinical behavior. Recent evidence highlights the prognostic and dynamic value of urinary and circulating tumor DNA for detecting aggressive disease, anticipating recurrence, and guiding treatment escalation. In parallel, AI-based models that integrate clinicopathological variables and computational histology significantly outperform current guideline-based risk calculators and thus allow refined patient stratification. Furthermore, emerging data demonstrate that immune infiltration patterns and microbiome composition influence response to intravesical therapies, particularly bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Together, these advances support a unified molecular-digital framework that integrates biomarkers, AI, and immunomicrobial profiling to personalize surveillance and treatment strategies. This evolving approach hold promise for optimizing bladder preservation and improving oncological outcomes in NMIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Combining tumor DNA tests, artificial intelligence tools, and analysis of the immune and microbial environment in the bladder may improve assessment of risk for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. This approach could allow more personalized treatment and follow-up.

在分子生物标志物、人工智能(AI)以及对肿瘤微环境和膀胱微生物组的更好理解的推动下,非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的治疗正在经历一场重大的范式转变。传统的基于分期和分级的风险分层不能反映NMIBC的生物学异质性及其可变的临床行为。最近的证据强调了尿液和循环肿瘤DNA在检测侵袭性疾病、预测复发和指导治疗升级方面的预后和动态价值。与此同时,基于人工智能的模型整合了临床病理变量和计算组织学,显著优于当前基于指南的风险计算器,从而允许精细的患者分层。此外,新出现的数据表明,免疫浸润模式和微生物组组成影响对膀胱内治疗的反应,特别是卡尔梅特-古萨林芽孢杆菌。总之,这些进展支持统一的分子数字框架,该框架集成了生物标志物、人工智能和免疫微生物分析,以个性化监测和治疗策略。这种不断发展的方法有望优化膀胱保存和改善NMIBC的肿瘤预后。患者总结:结合肿瘤DNA检测、人工智能工具以及膀胱免疫和微生物环境分析,可以改善非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者的风险评估。这种方法可以实现更个性化的治疗和随访。
{"title":"The Future of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Towards a Molecular-Digital Paradigm for Personalized Management.","authors":"Pierre-Etienne Gabriel, Evanguelos Xylinas","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is undergoing a major paradigm shift driven by molecular biomarkers, artificial intelligence (AI), and a better understanding of the tumor microenvironment and bladder microbiome. Traditional risk stratification based on stage and grade fails to capture the biological heterogeneity of NMIBC and its variable clinical behavior. Recent evidence highlights the prognostic and dynamic value of urinary and circulating tumor DNA for detecting aggressive disease, anticipating recurrence, and guiding treatment escalation. In parallel, AI-based models that integrate clinicopathological variables and computational histology significantly outperform current guideline-based risk calculators and thus allow refined patient stratification. Furthermore, emerging data demonstrate that immune infiltration patterns and microbiome composition influence response to intravesical therapies, particularly bacillus Calmette-Guérin. Together, these advances support a unified molecular-digital framework that integrates biomarkers, AI, and immunomicrobial profiling to personalize surveillance and treatment strategies. This evolving approach hold promise for optimizing bladder preservation and improving oncological outcomes in NMIBC. PATIENT SUMMARY: Combining tumor DNA tests, artificial intelligence tools, and analysis of the immune and microbial environment in the bladder may improve assessment of risk for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. This approach could allow more personalized treatment and follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146040744","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Five-year Retreatment and Medication Restart Rates Following Benign Prostate Hyperplasia Treatments: A Nationwide Real-world Analysis Using Epic Cosmos. 良性前列腺增生治疗后5年再治疗率和药物重新启动率:使用Epic Cosmos的全国真实世界分析。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.003
Filippo Carletti, Flavia Tamborino, Alexandru Turcan, Valerio Santarelli, Fabio Maria Valenzi, Luca Alfredo Morgantini, Hakan Bahadir Haberal, Fabrizio Dal Moro, Simone Crivellaro

Background and objective: Surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have expanded with the diffusion of minimally invasive surgical treatments (MISTs), but concerns persist regarding their long-term durability. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive, real-world description of current treatment trends, retreatment rates, and medication reinitiation up to 5 yr following MISTs and traditional procedures.

Methods: This observational retrospective fixed-cohort study was conducted using Epic Cosmos, including data of 6 450 295 patients and 420 611 procedures between 2014 and 2024. The primary outcome was procedural trend; the secondary outcomes were surgical retreatment and medication reinitiation. Analyses were descriptive and unadjusted for potential confounders due to the aggregated nature of the dataset.

Key findings and limitations: At 5 yr, retreatment rates were higher after prostatic urethral lift (PUL; 16%), transurethral needle ablation of the prostate (15%), transurethral microwave thermotherapy (17%), and Rezūm (14%), and lower after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP)/thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP; 4.4%) and simple prostatectomy (1.2%) when compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP; 7.1%). Medication reinitiation at 5 yr was more common after MISTs (PUL: 21% α-blockers, 25% 5α-reductase inhibitors [5-ARIs], and 27% overactive bladder [OAB] drugs; all p < 0.001; Rezūm: 18% α-blockers, p = 0.001; 22% 5-ARIs, p = 0.05; and 23% OAB drugs, p > 0.99) and lower following traditional procedures, including HoLEP/ThuLEP-11% α-blockers (p < 0.001), 12% 5-ARIs (p < 0.001), and 21% OAB drugs (p = 0.3), and simple prostatectomy-5.4% α-blockers (p < 0.001), 6.5% 5-ARIs (p < 0.001), and 9.4% OAB drugs (p < 0.001), when compared with TURP (15% α-blockers, 17% 5-ARIs, and 23% OAB drugs). Limitations include the use of aggregated electronic health record data subject to coding errors and the inability to adjust for clinical variables such as prostate size and symptom severity.

Conclusions and clinical implications: In this large, real-world cohort, anatomical procedures such as HoLEP, ThuLEP, and simple prostatectomy were associated with the lowest long-term rates of retreatment and medication restart, whereas higher rates were observed with MISTs, particularly PUL and Rezūm. TURP remained the most performed procedure. As the use of MISTs declines after its initial uptake, future studies should clarify which patient characteristics may underlie these observed differences.

背景和目的:随着微创手术治疗(mist)的普及,良性前列腺增生(BPH)的手术治疗已经扩大,但对其长期持久性的担忧仍然存在。本研究旨在全面、真实地描述当前的治疗趋势、再治疗率和在mist和传统程序后长达5年的药物再启动。方法:本观察性回顾性固定队列研究使用Epic Cosmos进行,包括2014年至2024年期间6450 295例患者和420 611例手术的数据。主要结局为程序趋势;次要结局为再手术治疗和再用药。由于数据集的聚合性质,分析是描述性的,未对潜在的混杂因素进行调整。主要发现和局限性:5年时,前列腺尿道提升术(PUL; 16%)、经尿道前列腺穿刺消融术(15%)、经尿道微波热疗术(17%)和Rezūm(14%)后的复治率较高,而钬激光前列腺摘除术(HoLEP)/铥激光前列腺摘除术(ThuLEP; 4.4%)和单纯前列腺切除术(1.2%)后的复治率低于经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP; 7.1%)。在使用mist (PUL: 21% α-阻滞剂,25% 5α-还原酶抑制剂[5- aris]和27%膀胱过动症[OAB]药物后,5年重新开始用药更为常见;结论和临床意义:在这个庞大的现实世界队列中,解剖手术(如HoLEP、ThuLEP和简单前列腺切除术)与最低的长期再治疗率和重新用药率相关,而雾疗法(特别是PUL和Rezūm)的长期再治疗率更高。TURP仍然是最常用的手术。随着mist的使用在最初摄入后减少,未来的研究应该阐明哪些患者特征可能是这些观察到的差异的基础。
{"title":"Five-year Retreatment and Medication Restart Rates Following Benign Prostate Hyperplasia Treatments: A Nationwide Real-world Analysis Using Epic Cosmos.","authors":"Filippo Carletti, Flavia Tamborino, Alexandru Turcan, Valerio Santarelli, Fabio Maria Valenzi, Luca Alfredo Morgantini, Hakan Bahadir Haberal, Fabrizio Dal Moro, Simone Crivellaro","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have expanded with the diffusion of minimally invasive surgical treatments (MISTs), but concerns persist regarding their long-term durability. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive, real-world description of current treatment trends, retreatment rates, and medication reinitiation up to 5 yr following MISTs and traditional procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational retrospective fixed-cohort study was conducted using Epic Cosmos, including data of 6 450 295 patients and 420 611 procedures between 2014 and 2024. The primary outcome was procedural trend; the secondary outcomes were surgical retreatment and medication reinitiation. Analyses were descriptive and unadjusted for potential confounders due to the aggregated nature of the dataset.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>At 5 yr, retreatment rates were higher after prostatic urethral lift (PUL; 16%), transurethral needle ablation of the prostate (15%), transurethral microwave thermotherapy (17%), and Rezūm (14%), and lower after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP)/thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP; 4.4%) and simple prostatectomy (1.2%) when compared with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP; 7.1%). Medication reinitiation at 5 yr was more common after MISTs (PUL: 21% α-blockers, 25% 5α-reductase inhibitors [5-ARIs], and 27% overactive bladder [OAB] drugs; all p < 0.001; Rezūm: 18% α-blockers, p = 0.001; 22% 5-ARIs, p = 0.05; and 23% OAB drugs, p > 0.99) and lower following traditional procedures, including HoLEP/ThuLEP-11% α-blockers (p < 0.001), 12% 5-ARIs (p < 0.001), and 21% OAB drugs (p = 0.3), and simple prostatectomy-5.4% α-blockers (p < 0.001), 6.5% 5-ARIs (p < 0.001), and 9.4% OAB drugs (p < 0.001), when compared with TURP (15% α-blockers, 17% 5-ARIs, and 23% OAB drugs). Limitations include the use of aggregated electronic health record data subject to coding errors and the inability to adjust for clinical variables such as prostate size and symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>In this large, real-world cohort, anatomical procedures such as HoLEP, ThuLEP, and simple prostatectomy were associated with the lowest long-term rates of retreatment and medication restart, whereas higher rates were observed with MISTs, particularly PUL and Rezūm. TURP remained the most performed procedure. As the use of MISTs declines after its initial uptake, future studies should clarify which patient characteristics may underlie these observed differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Re: Mattia Longoni, Leonardo Quarta, Donato Cannoletta, et al. Long-term Functional Outcomes and Decision Regret after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Experienced Surgeon Series. Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.014. 回复:Mattia Longoni, Leonardo Quarta, Donato Cannoletta等。机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的长期功能结果和决策后悔:一个有经验的外科医生系列。Eur url Focus。在出版社。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.014。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.007
Ingmar Wolff, Maximilian Burger, Sabine Brookman-May, Matthias May
{"title":"Re: Mattia Longoni, Leonardo Quarta, Donato Cannoletta, et al. Long-term Functional Outcomes and Decision Regret after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Experienced Surgeon Series. Eur Urol Focus. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.014.","authors":"Ingmar Wolff, Maximilian Burger, Sabine Brookman-May, Matthias May","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2026.01.007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Evidence-based Role of Urodynamics in Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Considering Prostate Surgery: An International Expert Consensus. 尿动力学在考虑前列腺手术的男性下尿路症状中的循证作用:国际专家共识。
IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.018
Marcus J Drake, Valerio Iacovelli, Francisco Cruz, Dean Elterman, Andrew Gammie, Chris Harding, Hashim Hashim, Thomas M Kessler, Ruth Kirschner-Hermanns, Gommert van Koeveringe, Scott MacDiarmid, Sachin Malde, Cosimo de Nunzio, Véronique Phé, Eric Rovner, Eskinder Solomon, Tufan Tarcan, Kari A O Tikkinen, Stefan de Wachter, Enrico Finazzi-Agro

Background and objective: This aim of this international expert consensus project was to clarify the appropriate use of urodynamics (UDS) in men with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) who are considering prostate surgery in light of high-quality published evidence, particularly high-certainty data from the UPSTREAM study, and expert clinical experience.

Methods: A modified version of the Delphi method was used. Postsurgical patients, catheterised patients, and patients with neurological disease were not included. Eight questions covered UDS in specific contexts; four addressed quality assurance.

Key findings and limitations: Consensus was reached on the need for UDS in any of the following circumstances: if the corrected maximum flow rate is ≥13 ml/s; if bothersome urinary urgency is present; if scores are below stated thresholds for overall symptoms or voiding symptoms; if the postvoid residual volume is considered meaningfully elevated; if there is extensive comorbidity; and if incontinence (any type) is identified. Consensus was not reached on the need for UDS in men with scores below the stated threshold for the impact on quality of life. Consensus was achieved for quality assurance in terms of cross-checking UDS pressure traces and derived indices; ensuring the trustworthiness of traces by experienced health care professionals; and review within the individual clinical context. UDS was considered important when benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is less likely and in cases in which detrusor underactivity or overactivity is more likely. In cases with severe voiding symptoms, UDS was not considered necessary to increase confidence in recommending surgery to treat LUTS.

Conclusions and clinical implications: UDS retains an important role in men with bothersome LUTS considering surgery for presumed BPO. Our consensus recommends specific criteria to guide selective UDS use.

背景和目的:这项国际专家共识项目的目的是根据高质量的已发表证据,特别是来自UPSTREAM研究的高确定性数据和专家临床经验,阐明泌尿动力学(UDS)在考虑前列腺手术的下尿路症状(LUTS)男性中的适当使用。方法:采用改进的德尔菲法。术后患者、导管患者和神经系统疾病患者不包括在内。8个问题涉及具体情况下的UDS;四项涉及质量保证。主要发现和局限性:在以下任何一种情况下都需要UDS达成共识:如果校正的最大流速≥13ml /s;如果有泌尿急症;如果得分低于总体症状或排尿症状的规定阈值;如果认为空后残余体积明显升高;如果有广泛的合并症;如果尿失禁(任何类型)被确定。对于评分低于规定的生活质量影响阈值的男性是否需要UDS,尚未达成共识。在交叉检查UDS压力轨迹和衍生指标方面达成了质量保证共识;由经验丰富的卫生保健专业人员确保痕迹的可信度;并在个体临床背景下进行回顾。当良性前列腺阻塞(BPO)的可能性较低,逼尿肌活动不足或过度活动的可能性较大时,UDS被认为是重要的。在有严重排尿症状的病例中,UDS被认为没有必要增加推荐手术治疗LUTS的信心。结论和临床意义:UDS在考虑手术治疗BPO的男性LUTS患者中仍具有重要作用。我们的共识是推荐具体的标准来指导UDS的选择性使用。
{"title":"The Evidence-based Role of Urodynamics in Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Considering Prostate Surgery: An International Expert Consensus.","authors":"Marcus J Drake, Valerio Iacovelli, Francisco Cruz, Dean Elterman, Andrew Gammie, Chris Harding, Hashim Hashim, Thomas M Kessler, Ruth Kirschner-Hermanns, Gommert van Koeveringe, Scott MacDiarmid, Sachin Malde, Cosimo de Nunzio, Véronique Phé, Eric Rovner, Eskinder Solomon, Tufan Tarcan, Kari A O Tikkinen, Stefan de Wachter, Enrico Finazzi-Agro","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>This aim of this international expert consensus project was to clarify the appropriate use of urodynamics (UDS) in men with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) who are considering prostate surgery in light of high-quality published evidence, particularly high-certainty data from the UPSTREAM study, and expert clinical experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified version of the Delphi method was used. Postsurgical patients, catheterised patients, and patients with neurological disease were not included. Eight questions covered UDS in specific contexts; four addressed quality assurance.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Consensus was reached on the need for UDS in any of the following circumstances: if the corrected maximum flow rate is ≥13 ml/s; if bothersome urinary urgency is present; if scores are below stated thresholds for overall symptoms or voiding symptoms; if the postvoid residual volume is considered meaningfully elevated; if there is extensive comorbidity; and if incontinence (any type) is identified. Consensus was not reached on the need for UDS in men with scores below the stated threshold for the impact on quality of life. Consensus was achieved for quality assurance in terms of cross-checking UDS pressure traces and derived indices; ensuring the trustworthiness of traces by experienced health care professionals; and review within the individual clinical context. UDS was considered important when benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) is less likely and in cases in which detrusor underactivity or overactivity is more likely. In cases with severe voiding symptoms, UDS was not considered necessary to increase confidence in recommending surgery to treat LUTS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>UDS retains an important role in men with bothersome LUTS considering surgery for presumed BPO. Our consensus recommends specific criteria to guide selective UDS use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145988935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European urology focus
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1