Pub Date : 2026-01-12DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.017
Georges Mjaess, Romain Diamand, Nayoth Dikete, Jethro C C Kwong, Martina Pezzullo, Gaëlle Margue, Vassiliki Pasoglou, Nicolas Michoux, Riccardo Campi, Daniele Amparore, Fouad Aoun, Simone Albisinni, Philippe Haroun, Julien Van Damme, Alexandre Peltier, Jean-Christophe Bernhard, Alexandre R Zlotta, Bertrand Tombal, Thierry Quackels, Thierry Roumeguère
Background and objective: Radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI)-based imaging models offer a noninvasive approach to preoperative risk stratification in localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), where existing prognostic tools remain limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate their predictive performance and methodological quality for recurrence and survival outcomes.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Scopus from inception through April 2025. Radiomics and AI models were assessed for prognostic accuracy regarding 5-yr fixed-time recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival after surgery for localized RCC. The extracted data included model type, radiomic features, validation methods, and area under the curve (AUC). Methodological quality was assessed using the APPRAISE-AI framework. Pooled 5-yr AUCs were synthesized using a prespecified random-effect model; heterogeneity was quantified (Q and τ2) and explored using a prespecified analysis restricted to external validation-only cohorts and sensitivity analyses.
Key findings and limitations: Thirty studies (n = 17 639) were included, predominantly retrospective and computed tomography (CT) based. The most predictive and frequently retained radiomic features were from the gray-level co-occurrence matrix and shape families. A meta-analysis of 20 radiomic model cohorts showed a pooled AUC of 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84-0.90) for 5-yr RFS (Q = 271.08; p < 0.001; τ2 = 0.0037). External validation cohorts showed a pooled AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.88; Q = 12.81; p = 0.172; τ2 = 0.0004). APPRAISE-AI revealed overall moderate methodological quality (median score: 54/100), with limited adherence to TRIPOD-AI and underuse of explainability tools.
Conclusions and clinical implications: Radiomic models for localized RCC built on standardized CT protocols and robust segmentation, and incorporating shape and texture features combined with clinical variables demonstrated high prognostic accuracy. Our meta-analysis confirms that such models predict recurrence and survival outcomes accurately.
{"title":"Radiomics and Image-based Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Recurrence and Survival After Surgery in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: An APPRAISE-AI Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Georges Mjaess, Romain Diamand, Nayoth Dikete, Jethro C C Kwong, Martina Pezzullo, Gaëlle Margue, Vassiliki Pasoglou, Nicolas Michoux, Riccardo Campi, Daniele Amparore, Fouad Aoun, Simone Albisinni, Philippe Haroun, Julien Van Damme, Alexandre Peltier, Jean-Christophe Bernhard, Alexandre R Zlotta, Bertrand Tombal, Thierry Quackels, Thierry Roumeguère","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI)-based imaging models offer a noninvasive approach to preoperative risk stratification in localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC), where existing prognostic tools remain limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate their predictive performance and methodological quality for recurrence and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Scopus from inception through April 2025. Radiomics and AI models were assessed for prognostic accuracy regarding 5-yr fixed-time recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival after surgery for localized RCC. The extracted data included model type, radiomic features, validation methods, and area under the curve (AUC). Methodological quality was assessed using the APPRAISE-AI framework. Pooled 5-yr AUCs were synthesized using a prespecified random-effect model; heterogeneity was quantified (Q and τ<sup>2</sup>) and explored using a prespecified analysis restricted to external validation-only cohorts and sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Thirty studies (n = 17 639) were included, predominantly retrospective and computed tomography (CT) based. The most predictive and frequently retained radiomic features were from the gray-level co-occurrence matrix and shape families. A meta-analysis of 20 radiomic model cohorts showed a pooled AUC of 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84-0.90) for 5-yr RFS (Q = 271.08; p < 0.001; τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.0037). External validation cohorts showed a pooled AUC of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.88; Q = 12.81; p = 0.172; τ<sup>2</sup> = 0.0004). APPRAISE-AI revealed overall moderate methodological quality (median score: 54/100), with limited adherence to TRIPOD-AI and underuse of explainability tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Radiomic models for localized RCC built on standardized CT protocols and robust segmentation, and incorporating shape and texture features combined with clinical variables demonstrated high prognostic accuracy. Our meta-analysis confirms that such models predict recurrence and survival outcomes accurately.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145965187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-09DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.016
Radion Garaz, Mahmoud Ziada, Jack Crozier, Karl H Pang, Hussain M Alnajjar, Constantine Alifrangis, Igor Tsaur, Asif Muneer
Background and objective: Treatment options for metastatic or recurrent penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) progressing after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy are limited, and no standard subsequent-line systemic therapy exists. We systematically reviewed the efficacy, safety, and survival outcomes of second- and later-line systemic treatments in this setting.
Methods: A systematic review, compliant with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (from inception to June 2025). Eligible studies enrolled adult males receiving systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy after progression on first-line treatment. The primary outcomes were overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival; the secondary outcomes included objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, adverse events (AEs), and quality of life (QoL).
Key findings and limitations: Seventeen studies (seven nonrandomized trials and ten case series; 367 patients) were included. Evidence quality was low due to small cohorts, heterogeneity, and potential bias. The reported median OS ranged from 4.3 to 9.5 mo and PFS ranged from 1.3 to 4.8 mo. Targeted therapies showed the most favorable OS (6.7-9.5 months) and lowest grade 3-4 AE rates (0-30%), followed by immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Biomarker-driven benefit was observed in patients with human papillomavirus positivity, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, or actionable genomic alterations (eg, PIK3CA, RAD51, and NOTCH1). QoL data were reported in only two studies, underscoring a major evidence gap. Interpretation is limited by the absence of randomized studies, inconsistent reporting, and the inability to distinguish second-line from later-line therapies in most studies.
Conclusions and clinical implications: No standard systemic therapy exists beyond first-line treatment for metastatic or recurrent PSCC. Targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors show encouraging activity in biomarker-selected subgroups. Prospective biomarker-guided trials and international collaborations are needed, while multidisciplinary management and clinical trial enrollment remain essential for optimizing outcomes for this rare malignancy.
背景和目的:转移性或复发性阴茎鳞状细胞癌(PSCC)在一线铂基化疗后进展的治疗选择是有限的,并且没有标准的后续线全身治疗存在。我们系统地回顾了在这种情况下二线和二线全身治疗的有效性、安全性和生存结局。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,对PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Medline、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov、Cochrane中央对照试验注册中心(Central)和国际临床试验注册平台(从成立到2025年6月)进行系统评价。符合条件的研究纳入了在一线治疗进展后接受全身化疗、免疫治疗或靶向治疗的成年男性。主要结局是总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS);次要结局包括客观缓解率、疾病控制率、缓解持续时间、不良事件(ae)和生活质量(QoL)。主要发现和局限性:纳入17项研究(7项非随机试验和10个病例系列;367例患者)。由于队列小、异质性和潜在偏倚,证据质量较低。报告的中位OS范围为4.3至9.5个月,PFS范围为1.3至4.8个月。靶向治疗显示最有利的OS(6.7-9.5个月)和最低的3-4级AE发生率(0-30%),其次是免疫治疗和化疗。在人乳头瘤病毒阳性、程序性死亡配体1表达或可操作的基因组改变(如PIK3CA、RAD51和NOTCH1)的患者中观察到生物标志物驱动的获益。只有两项研究报告了生活质量数据,强调了一个主要的证据差距。由于缺乏随机研究,报告不一致,以及在大多数研究中无法区分二线和后期治疗,解释受到限制。结论和临床意义:对于转移性或复发性PSCC,除了一线治疗之外,没有标准的全身治疗。靶向药物和免疫检查点抑制剂在生物标志物选择亚组中显示出令人鼓舞的活性。前瞻性生物标志物引导试验和国际合作是必要的,而多学科管理和临床试验登记对于优化这种罕见恶性肿瘤的结果仍然至关重要。
{"title":"Subsequent-line Systemic Therapy for Metastatic or Recurrent Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Toxicity, and Outcomes.","authors":"Radion Garaz, Mahmoud Ziada, Jack Crozier, Karl H Pang, Hussain M Alnajjar, Constantine Alifrangis, Igor Tsaur, Asif Muneer","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Treatment options for metastatic or recurrent penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) progressing after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy are limited, and no standard subsequent-line systemic therapy exists. We systematically reviewed the efficacy, safety, and survival outcomes of second- and later-line systemic treatments in this setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review, compliant with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, was performed across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (from inception to June 2025). Eligible studies enrolled adult males receiving systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy after progression on first-line treatment. The primary outcomes were overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival; the secondary outcomes included objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, adverse events (AEs), and quality of life (QoL).</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Seventeen studies (seven nonrandomized trials and ten case series; 367 patients) were included. Evidence quality was low due to small cohorts, heterogeneity, and potential bias. The reported median OS ranged from 4.3 to 9.5 mo and PFS ranged from 1.3 to 4.8 mo. Targeted therapies showed the most favorable OS (6.7-9.5 months) and lowest grade 3-4 AE rates (0-30%), followed by immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Biomarker-driven benefit was observed in patients with human papillomavirus positivity, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, or actionable genomic alterations (eg, PIK3CA, RAD51, and NOTCH1). QoL data were reported in only two studies, underscoring a major evidence gap. Interpretation is limited by the absence of randomized studies, inconsistent reporting, and the inability to distinguish second-line from later-line therapies in most studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>No standard systemic therapy exists beyond first-line treatment for metastatic or recurrent PSCC. Targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors show encouraging activity in biomarker-selected subgroups. Prospective biomarker-guided trials and international collaborations are needed, while multidisciplinary management and clinical trial enrollment remain essential for optimizing outcomes for this rare malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145948680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-26DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.09.003
Markus Arvendell, Ahmad Abbadi, Lottie Phillips, Alessio Crippa, Tobias Nordström, Anna Lantz
Background and objective: Socioeconomic disparities in opportunistic prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer (PCa) are well known. To explore whether the introduction of organised prostate cancer testing (OPT) was associated with reduced disparities, we compared associations between socioeconomic status and PSA testing among invited and ineligible men.
Methods: A register- and population-based cohort study was conducted including all men in Stockholm County invited to OPT in 2022-2023 (OPT invitees, aged 50 yr, born in 1972-1973) and a concurrently ineligible control group (OPT ineligible, aged 52-53 yr, born in 1969-1971). A sensitivity analysis included men aged 50-51 yr in 2017-2018 (born in 1966-1968). Associations with PSA testing were analysed using logistic regression, with educational level, civil status, income, and birth country/region as socioeconomic indicators. Z tests compared associations between cohorts.
Key findings and limitations: A total of 33 754 OPT invitees and 76 535 OPT-ineligible men were included. PSA testing was higher among OPT invitees (39%) than among OPT-ineligible men (13%) across all socioeconomic strata. In adjusted models, higher education was associated with increased testing among OPT invitees (odds ratio [OR] 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73-2.06), but not among OPT-ineligible men (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94-1.12; p < 0.001). Income was associated with increased testing in both groups, particularly among OPT-ineligible men (OR 3.56, 95% CI 3.28-3.87 compared to 2.18, 95% CI 2.01-2.37; p = 0.006). Being born outside the Nordic countries was associated with lower uptake among OPT invitees. The sensitivity analysis aligned with the main findings. Limitations include potential residual confounding.
Conclusions and clinical implications: While OPT increased PSA testing overall, socioeconomic disparities persisted. Targeted strategies are needed to ensure equitable participation.
{"title":"Socioeconomic Status and Prostate-specific Antigen Testing: A Population-based Cohort Study Comparing Organised and Opportunistic Prostate Cancer Testing.","authors":"Markus Arvendell, Ahmad Abbadi, Lottie Phillips, Alessio Crippa, Tobias Nordström, Anna Lantz","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.09.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.09.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Socioeconomic disparities in opportunistic prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer (PCa) are well known. To explore whether the introduction of organised prostate cancer testing (OPT) was associated with reduced disparities, we compared associations between socioeconomic status and PSA testing among invited and ineligible men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A register- and population-based cohort study was conducted including all men in Stockholm County invited to OPT in 2022-2023 (OPT invitees, aged 50 yr, born in 1972-1973) and a concurrently ineligible control group (OPT ineligible, aged 52-53 yr, born in 1969-1971). A sensitivity analysis included men aged 50-51 yr in 2017-2018 (born in 1966-1968). Associations with PSA testing were analysed using logistic regression, with educational level, civil status, income, and birth country/region as socioeconomic indicators. Z tests compared associations between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>A total of 33 754 OPT invitees and 76 535 OPT-ineligible men were included. PSA testing was higher among OPT invitees (39%) than among OPT-ineligible men (13%) across all socioeconomic strata. In adjusted models, higher education was associated with increased testing among OPT invitees (odds ratio [OR] 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.73-2.06), but not among OPT-ineligible men (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94-1.12; p < 0.001). Income was associated with increased testing in both groups, particularly among OPT-ineligible men (OR 3.56, 95% CI 3.28-3.87 compared to 2.18, 95% CI 2.01-2.37; p = 0.006). Being born outside the Nordic countries was associated with lower uptake among OPT invitees. The sensitivity analysis aligned with the main findings. Limitations include potential residual confounding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>While OPT increased PSA testing overall, socioeconomic disparities persisted. Targeted strategies are needed to ensure equitable participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145846340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.10.005
Leonardo Quarta, Francesco Pellegrino, Armando Stabile, Pietro Scilipoti, Mattia Longoni, Donato Cannoletta, Paolo Zaurito, Alfonso Santangelo, Alessandro Viti, Andrea Cosenza, Riccardo Leni, Antony Pellegrino, Francesco Barletta, Simone Scuderi, Daniele Robesti, Elio Mazzone, Giorgio Brembilla, Francesco De Cobelli, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Giorgio Gandaglia
Background and objective: Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) can improve the accuracy of the prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic pathway when combined with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). However, it is unknown how the risk of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) at each PSAD value varies according to prostate volume in patients with positive mpMRI findings (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] score ≥3).
Methods: The study included 1731 patients with positive mpMRI findings who underwent MRI-targeted biopsy (TBx) plus systematic biopsy (SBx). The predicted risk of csPCa as a function of PSAD was plotted to explore how the appropriate PSAD cutoff varies according to prostate volume.
Key findings and limitations: Overall, 30%, 48%, and 22% of patients had PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions, respectively. csPCa was diagnosed in 56% of patients. Overall, the median predicted risk of csPCa corresponding to PSAD of 0.10 ng/ml/ml was 37% for prostate volume <45 ml, and 15% for prostate volume between 60 and 100 ml. For PI-RADS 3 lesions, patients with a prostate volume <40 ml had csPCa risk of >10% irrespective of their PSAD. For prostate volume >40 ml, the PSAD cutoff corresponding to csPCa risk of 10% varied between 0.10 and 0.15 ng/ml/ml. The main limitations of the study include the retrospective design and the tertiary referral center setting.
Conclusions and clinical implications: The predictive value of PSAD for csPCa detection varies according to prostate volume. The added value of PSAD in detecting csPCa in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions is greater for those with prostate volume >40 ml.
{"title":"Does the Accuracy of Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Identifying Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Change with Prostate Volume?","authors":"Leonardo Quarta, Francesco Pellegrino, Armando Stabile, Pietro Scilipoti, Mattia Longoni, Donato Cannoletta, Paolo Zaurito, Alfonso Santangelo, Alessandro Viti, Andrea Cosenza, Riccardo Leni, Antony Pellegrino, Francesco Barletta, Simone Scuderi, Daniele Robesti, Elio Mazzone, Giorgio Brembilla, Francesco De Cobelli, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti, Giorgio Gandaglia","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.10.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.10.005","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) can improve the accuracy of the prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic pathway when combined with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). However, it is unknown how the risk of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) at each PSAD value varies according to prostate volume in patients with positive mpMRI findings (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] score ≥3).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 1731 patients with positive mpMRI findings who underwent MRI-targeted biopsy (TBx) plus systematic biopsy (SBx). The predicted risk of csPCa as a function of PSAD was plotted to explore how the appropriate PSAD cutoff varies according to prostate volume.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Overall, 30%, 48%, and 22% of patients had PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions, respectively. csPCa was diagnosed in 56% of patients. Overall, the median predicted risk of csPCa corresponding to PSAD of 0.10 ng/ml/ml was 37% for prostate volume <45 ml, and 15% for prostate volume between 60 and 100 ml. For PI-RADS 3 lesions, patients with a prostate volume <40 ml had csPCa risk of >10% irrespective of their PSAD. For prostate volume >40 ml, the PSAD cutoff corresponding to csPCa risk of 10% varied between 0.10 and 0.15 ng/ml/ml. The main limitations of the study include the retrospective design and the tertiary referral center setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The predictive value of PSAD for csPCa detection varies according to prostate volume. The added value of PSAD in detecting csPCa in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions is greater for those with prostate volume >40 ml.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145827009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-23DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.012
Louise Kostos, Heidi Fettke, Tu Nguyen-Dumont, Michael S Hofman, Arun A Azad
{"title":"Reply to Tonghu Liu, Congcong Zhu, and Zechen Yan's Letter to the Editor re: Heidi Fettke, Louise Kostos, Maria Docanto, et al. Baseline and Early On-treatment Circulating Tumour DNA Fraction Are a Key Prognostic Biomarker in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.08.015.","authors":"Louise Kostos, Heidi Fettke, Tu Nguyen-Dumont, Michael S Hofman, Arun A Azad","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145827040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-22DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.008
Nicolas A Soputro, Sonam Saxena, Jewel Bamby, Arianna Biasatti, Francesco Aguirre, Ruben Sauer Calvo, Gabriela Nieto-Blanco, Rasheed Thompson, Kennedy E Okhawere, Graham Kupsaw, Abdulrahman Al-Bayati, Sarah Duncan, Gianna Jimenez, Dattatraya Patil, Shamsunnahar Imtiaz, C Adam Lorentz, Jennifer A Linehan, Simone Crivellaro, Srinivas Vourganti, Riccardo Autorino, Mihir S Shah, Andrew Wagner, Peter Chang, Mutahar Ahmed, Michael D Stifelman, Bertram Yuh, Ketan K Badani, Jihad Kaouk
Background and objective: The introduction of the purpose-built single-port (SP) robotic platform has paved the way for the development of regionalized surgical approaches, as evident by the advent of low anterior access (LAA) SP retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (rRAPN). Our aim was to evaluate perioperative outcomes of LAA SP-rRAPN in comparison to the standard transperitoneal multiport (MP) robotic approach.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained database of the SP Advanced Research Consortium (SPARC) to identify all consecutive patients who underwent RAPN between 2015 and 2025. We applied 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for analysis to ensure comparable baseline characteristics, including comorbidities, renal function, and tumor complexity.
Key findings and limitations: Of 2306 patients, our PSM analysis included 302 LAA SP-rRAPN cases and 302 MP-RAPN cases. Following PSM, the two cohorts demonstrated comparable operative time, estimated blood loss, surgical margin status, and incidence of major postoperative complications. A history of abdominal surgery was more common in the SP group (55.1% vs MP 42.7%; p = 0.005). Postoperatively, the SP cohort had significantly shorter hospital stay (<24 h: SP 41.6% vs MP 10.9%; p < 0.001), lower postoperative pain (median highest pain score: SP 5 vs MP 6; p < 0.001), and less frequent need for opioids (SP 46.3% vs MP 93.1%; p < 0.001). Notably, no SP patients experienced postoperative ileus or respiratory complications such as atelectasis, pleural effusion, or pneumonia.
Conclusions and clinical implications: This study highlights the safety and efficacy of LAA SP-rRAPN, which has perioperative outcomes comparable to those for the transperitoneal MP robotic approach. Moreover, LAA SP-rRAPN offers additional benefits, including enhanced postoperative recovery with lower morbidity, and provides a viable surgical alternative for patients with complex abdominal surgical history.
背景与目的:专用单口(SP)机器人平台的引入为区域手术入路的发展铺平了道路,低前路(LAA) SP腹膜后机器人辅助部分肾切除术(rRAPN)的出现就是很好的证明。我们的目的是评估LAA SP-rRAPN与标准经腹膜多孔(MP)机器人入路的围手术期结果。方法:我们对机构审查委员会批准的、前瞻性维护的SP高级研究联盟(SPARC)数据库进行了回顾性审查,以确定2015年至2025年间所有连续接受RAPN的患者。我们采用1:1倾向评分匹配(PSM)进行分析,以确保可比较的基线特征,包括合并症、肾功能和肿瘤复杂性。主要发现和局限性:在2306例患者中,我们的PSM分析包括302例LAA sp - rapn病例和302例MP-RAPN病例。采用PSM后,两组患者的手术时间、估计出血量、手术切缘状态和主要术后并发症发生率比较。SP组腹部手术史更常见(55.1% vs 42.7%; p = 0.005)。结论和临床意义:本研究强调了LAA SP- rrapn的安全性和有效性,其围手术期结果与经腹膜MP机器人入路相当。此外,LAA SP-rRAPN提供了额外的好处,包括提高术后恢复和降低发病率,并为有复杂腹部手术史的患者提供了可行的手术选择。
{"title":"Single-port Robotic Retroperitoneal Partial Nephrectomy via Low Anterior Access: A Propensity-matched Comparative Analysis to Standard Transperitoneal Multiport Robotic Surgery from the Single Port Advanced Research Consortium (SPARC).","authors":"Nicolas A Soputro, Sonam Saxena, Jewel Bamby, Arianna Biasatti, Francesco Aguirre, Ruben Sauer Calvo, Gabriela Nieto-Blanco, Rasheed Thompson, Kennedy E Okhawere, Graham Kupsaw, Abdulrahman Al-Bayati, Sarah Duncan, Gianna Jimenez, Dattatraya Patil, Shamsunnahar Imtiaz, C Adam Lorentz, Jennifer A Linehan, Simone Crivellaro, Srinivas Vourganti, Riccardo Autorino, Mihir S Shah, Andrew Wagner, Peter Chang, Mutahar Ahmed, Michael D Stifelman, Bertram Yuh, Ketan K Badani, Jihad Kaouk","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.008","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The introduction of the purpose-built single-port (SP) robotic platform has paved the way for the development of regionalized surgical approaches, as evident by the advent of low anterior access (LAA) SP retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (rRAPN). Our aim was to evaluate perioperative outcomes of LAA SP-rRAPN in comparison to the standard transperitoneal multiport (MP) robotic approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of the institutional review board-approved, prospectively maintained database of the SP Advanced Research Consortium (SPARC) to identify all consecutive patients who underwent RAPN between 2015 and 2025. We applied 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for analysis to ensure comparable baseline characteristics, including comorbidities, renal function, and tumor complexity.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Of 2306 patients, our PSM analysis included 302 LAA SP-rRAPN cases and 302 MP-RAPN cases. Following PSM, the two cohorts demonstrated comparable operative time, estimated blood loss, surgical margin status, and incidence of major postoperative complications. A history of abdominal surgery was more common in the SP group (55.1% vs MP 42.7%; p = 0.005). Postoperatively, the SP cohort had significantly shorter hospital stay (<24 h: SP 41.6% vs MP 10.9%; p < 0.001), lower postoperative pain (median highest pain score: SP 5 vs MP 6; p < 0.001), and less frequent need for opioids (SP 46.3% vs MP 93.1%; p < 0.001). Notably, no SP patients experienced postoperative ileus or respiratory complications such as atelectasis, pleural effusion, or pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>This study highlights the safety and efficacy of LAA SP-rRAPN, which has perioperative outcomes comparable to those for the transperitoneal MP robotic approach. Moreover, LAA SP-rRAPN offers additional benefits, including enhanced postoperative recovery with lower morbidity, and provides a viable surgical alternative for patients with complex abdominal surgical history.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145818649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-20DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.014
Mattia Longoni, Leonardo Quarta, Donato Cannoletta, Pietro Scilipoti, Andrea Cosenza, Margherita Ciabattini, Antonio Perri, Vito Cucchiara, Francesco Barletta, Simone Scuderi, Armando Stabile, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Alberto Briganti, Giorgio Gandaglia, Francesco Montorsi
Background and objective: We assessed long-term urinary continence (UC) and erectile function (EF) in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and tested their effect on treatment decision regret (DR).
Methods: We identified 126 patients treated with RARP by a single high-volume surgeon between 2018 and 2021 with at least 4 yr of follow-up and complete functional assessment from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients were offered penile rehabilitation (PR) with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and/or intracavernosal injections, and pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) with physiotherapist support. UC was defined as the use of 0-1 safety pads/d. EF was defined as erection sufficient for sexual intercourse. DR was measured using the validated Decisional Regret Scale (DRS), which ranges from 0 (no regret) to 100 (maximum regret). Multivariable Cox and logistic regression models predicting EF/UC recovery and DR were fitted.
Key findings and limitations: The median age was 64 yr. D'Amico risk groups distribution was 12 (9.5%) low-, 62 (49%) intermediate, and 52 (41%) high-risk. At median follow-up of 51 mo, 57 patients experienced EF recovery and 102 experienced UC recovery. The group that received PR (n = 70, 56%) had a higher 48-mo EF recovery rate versus the group that did not receive PR (66% vs 22%; hazard ratio 2.9; p = 0.004). The majority of patients (n = 111, 88%) received PFR, and the 48-mo UC recovery rate was 83% in the overall cohort. Median DRS at last follow-up was 20, with low DR (DRS ≤15) reported by 50 patients (40%) and mild DR (DRS ≤25) by 78 (62%). Only long-term UC recovery was independently associated with mild DR (odds ratio 4.0; p = 0.010).
Conclusions and clinical implications: While PR correlated with better EF recovery, only UC recovery was the key determinant of DR after RARP.
{"title":"Long-term Functional Outcomes and Decision Regret after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Experienced Surgeon Series.","authors":"Mattia Longoni, Leonardo Quarta, Donato Cannoletta, Pietro Scilipoti, Andrea Cosenza, Margherita Ciabattini, Antonio Perri, Vito Cucchiara, Francesco Barletta, Simone Scuderi, Armando Stabile, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Alberto Briganti, Giorgio Gandaglia, Francesco Montorsi","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.014","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>We assessed long-term urinary continence (UC) and erectile function (EF) in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and tested their effect on treatment decision regret (DR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 126 patients treated with RARP by a single high-volume surgeon between 2018 and 2021 with at least 4 yr of follow-up and complete functional assessment from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients were offered penile rehabilitation (PR) with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors and/or intracavernosal injections, and pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) with physiotherapist support. UC was defined as the use of 0-1 safety pads/d. EF was defined as erection sufficient for sexual intercourse. DR was measured using the validated Decisional Regret Scale (DRS), which ranges from 0 (no regret) to 100 (maximum regret). Multivariable Cox and logistic regression models predicting EF/UC recovery and DR were fitted.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>The median age was 64 yr. D'Amico risk groups distribution was 12 (9.5%) low-, 62 (49%) intermediate, and 52 (41%) high-risk. At median follow-up of 51 mo, 57 patients experienced EF recovery and 102 experienced UC recovery. The group that received PR (n = 70, 56%) had a higher 48-mo EF recovery rate versus the group that did not receive PR (66% vs 22%; hazard ratio 2.9; p = 0.004). The majority of patients (n = 111, 88%) received PFR, and the 48-mo UC recovery rate was 83% in the overall cohort. Median DRS at last follow-up was 20, with low DR (DRS ≤15) reported by 50 patients (40%) and mild DR (DRS ≤25) by 78 (62%). Only long-term UC recovery was independently associated with mild DR (odds ratio 4.0; p = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>While PR correlated with better EF recovery, only UC recovery was the key determinant of DR after RARP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145803711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.011
Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Gregory Xiang Wen Pek, Thomas Herrmann, Daniele Castellani, Khi Yung Fong, Jaisukh Kalathia, Wei Zhu, Gopal Ramdas Tak, Marcos Cepeda, Nariman Gadzhiev, Vigen Malkhasyan, Maher Al Hadithi, Rajesh Kukreja, Arun Chawla, Madhu Sudan Agrawal, Chandra Mohan Vaddi, Takaaki Inoue, Venkatsubramaniam Dhandapani, Nebil Akdogan, Tzevat Tefik, Nitesh Kumar, Kremena Petkova, Abu Baker, Karl Marvin Tan, Chinnakhet Ketsuwan, Mahmoud Laymon, Kemal Sarica, Mohamed Omar, Alexey Martov, Guohua Zeng, Bhaskar Kumar Somani, Vineet Gauhar
Background and objective: This study compares 30-d perioperative outcomes between suction mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (S-mPCNL) and nonsuction mPCNL (NS-mPCNL).
Methods: This prospective multicenter study involved 20 surgeons from 14 countries. The primary outcome was the 30-d stone free rate (SFR) on computed tomography. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with 100% SFR and the overall complication rate.
Key findings and limitations: PSM for 1915 patients (1534 S-mPCNL, 381 NS-mPCNL) yielded a cohort of 664 S-mPCNL and 309 NS-mPCNL cases for analysis. Baseline and stone characteristics were well matched. The 30-d 100% SFR (grade A) was high in both groups and did not significantly differ (85% vs 87%; odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.49; p = 0.9). The S-mPCNL group had a shorter median operative time (43 vs 57 min), higher intraoperative SFR according to visual inspection or fluoroscopy (82% vs 70%), and lower blood transfusion rate (1.3% vs 3.6%). There was no between-group difference in infectious complications. Multivariable analysis revealed that stone volume (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.99; p = 0.021) and single-step dilatation (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.85-5.81; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with grade A SFR. Limitations include variability in practice.
Conclusions and clinical implications: Suction during mPCNL improves intraoperative stone clearance rates and reduces the operative time, with no significant difference in 30-d SFR or infectious complications. Both S-mPCNL and NS-mPCNL achieve high rates of zero residual fragments.
背景与目的:本研究比较吸式微型经皮肾镜取石术(S-mPCNL)与非吸式肾镜取石术(NS-mPCNL)围手术期30 d的预后。方法:这项前瞻性多中心研究涉及来自14个国家的20名外科医生。主要结果是计算机断层扫描显示的30天结石无结石率(SFR)。倾向评分匹配(PSM)用于调整两组之间的基线差异。采用多变量logistic回归评估与100% SFR和总并发症发生率相关的因素。主要发现和局限性:PSM对1915例患者(1534例S-mPCNL, 381例NS-mPCNL)进行分析,产生664例S-mPCNL和309例NS-mPCNL病例。基线和结石特征吻合良好。两组患者30-d 100% SFR (A级)均较高,且无显著差异(85% vs 87%;优势比[OR] 0.97, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.63-1.49; p = 0.9)。S-mPCNL组中位手术时间较短(43对57分钟),目视检查或透视检查显示术中SFR较高(82%对70%),输血率较低(1.3%对3.6%)。感染并发症组间无差异。多变量分析显示,结石体积(OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.99; p = 0.021)和单步扩张(OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.85-5.81; p)可提高mPCNL术中结石清除率,缩短手术时间,30 d SFR和感染性并发症无显著差异。S-mPCNL和NS-mPCNL都实现了较高的零残留碎片率。
{"title":"Propensity Score-matched Analysis of 30-day Outcomes of Suction Versus Nonsuction Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy from a Real-World Multicenter Prospective Study: Collaboration Between the European Association of Urology Endourology Section and the Asian Urological Society of Endoluminal Surgery and Technology.","authors":"Steffi Kar Kei Yuen, Gregory Xiang Wen Pek, Thomas Herrmann, Daniele Castellani, Khi Yung Fong, Jaisukh Kalathia, Wei Zhu, Gopal Ramdas Tak, Marcos Cepeda, Nariman Gadzhiev, Vigen Malkhasyan, Maher Al Hadithi, Rajesh Kukreja, Arun Chawla, Madhu Sudan Agrawal, Chandra Mohan Vaddi, Takaaki Inoue, Venkatsubramaniam Dhandapani, Nebil Akdogan, Tzevat Tefik, Nitesh Kumar, Kremena Petkova, Abu Baker, Karl Marvin Tan, Chinnakhet Ketsuwan, Mahmoud Laymon, Kemal Sarica, Mohamed Omar, Alexey Martov, Guohua Zeng, Bhaskar Kumar Somani, Vineet Gauhar","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>This study compares 30-d perioperative outcomes between suction mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (S-mPCNL) and nonsuction mPCNL (NS-mPCNL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective multicenter study involved 20 surgeons from 14 countries. The primary outcome was the 30-d stone free rate (SFR) on computed tomography. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with 100% SFR and the overall complication rate.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>PSM for 1915 patients (1534 S-mPCNL, 381 NS-mPCNL) yielded a cohort of 664 S-mPCNL and 309 NS-mPCNL cases for analysis. Baseline and stone characteristics were well matched. The 30-d 100% SFR (grade A) was high in both groups and did not significantly differ (85% vs 87%; odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.49; p = 0.9). The S-mPCNL group had a shorter median operative time (43 vs 57 min), higher intraoperative SFR according to visual inspection or fluoroscopy (82% vs 70%), and lower blood transfusion rate (1.3% vs 3.6%). There was no between-group difference in infectious complications. Multivariable analysis revealed that stone volume (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87-0.99; p = 0.021) and single-step dilatation (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.85-5.81; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with grade A SFR. Limitations include variability in practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Suction during mPCNL improves intraoperative stone clearance rates and reduces the operative time, with no significant difference in 30-d SFR or infectious complications. Both S-mPCNL and NS-mPCNL achieve high rates of zero residual fragments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.11.021
Rui Bernardino, Jennifer Le Guevélou, Riccardo Autorino, Giorgio Gandaglia, Giancarlo Marra
{"title":"Re: Nikita Sushentsev, Anne Y. Warren, Richard Colling, et al. Active Monitoring, Surgery, and Radiotherapy for Cribriform-positive and Cribriform-negative Prostate Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of the PROTECT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.4125.","authors":"Rui Bernardino, Jennifer Le Guevélou, Riccardo Autorino, Giorgio Gandaglia, Giancarlo Marra","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.11.021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.11.021","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-19DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.013
Seyed Behzad Jazayeri, Renzo G DiNatale, Christopher Guske, Christian Harrs, Joshua Linscott, Hongzhi Xu, Facundo Davaro, Lexiaochuan Wen, Philippe E Spiess, Wade J Sexton, Scott M Gilbert, Logan Zemp, Michael A Poch, Roger Li
Background and objective: Intravesical recurrence after induction bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy is common in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), but longitudinal, real-world data using contemporary definitions of the BCG-exposed (BCG-E) phenotype remain limited, which constrains trial design. We assessed long-term clinical outcomes and clinical trajectories for a large BCG-exposed cohort treated at a single tertiary care center to establish pragmatic benchmarks to inform patient counseling, surveillance strategies, and the design and interpretation of bladder-sparing studies.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study for adults with histologically confirmed high-grade NMIBC treated with intravesical BCG at Moffitt Cancer Center between 1988 and 2024. Relevant clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records into a prespecified database, including detailed BCG doses and timing and features of each recurrence episode. Initial management followed contemporary standards, with subsequent intravesical therapy or radical cystectomy (RC) after shared decision-making. Patients were classified as BCG-unresponsive (BCG-UR) or BCG-E, with BCG adequacy defined as previously published. Time-to-event endpoints were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models; baseline characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.
Key findings and limitations: Of 1076 NMIBC patients treated with BCG, 470 were classifiable: 245 (52.1%) were BCG-E, of whom 173 (70.6%) were resistant and 72 (29.4%) experienced delayed relapse, and 225 (47.9%) were BCG-UR. In the BCG-E group, 50.2% experienced recurrence and 15.5% experienced progression; median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 27.2 mo. The 5-yr survival rate estimates were 32.25% for RFS, 79.3% for progression-free survival (PFS), 84.5% for metastasis-free survival (MFS), and 65.0% for overall survival (OS). Recurrence was associated with worse PFS (p < 0.001) and MFS (p = 0.03), but not OS (p = 0.2). RC was performed in 45 patients (18.4%). No consistent survival differences were observed across salvage therapies (62.0% BCG, 18.4% gemcitabine + docetaxel, 5.3% single-agent chemotherapy, 1.2% trials, 13% surveillance),. Multivariable OS estimates were computed. Addition of recurrence to the model did not improve discrimination; age and performance status were the strongest predictors of OS.
Conclusions and clinical implications: We present comprehensive outcomes for and an in-depth characterization of clinical trajectories in BCG-E NMIBC, for which salvage intravesical BCG is predominant and oncologic results are durable. These data provide pragmatic benchmarks for the interpretation and design of bladder-sparing trials in this setting.
{"title":"Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-exposed Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Survival Benchmarks, Bladder-sparing Strategies, and Implications for Trial Design.","authors":"Seyed Behzad Jazayeri, Renzo G DiNatale, Christopher Guske, Christian Harrs, Joshua Linscott, Hongzhi Xu, Facundo Davaro, Lexiaochuan Wen, Philippe E Spiess, Wade J Sexton, Scott M Gilbert, Logan Zemp, Michael A Poch, Roger Li","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.12.013","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Intravesical recurrence after induction bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy is common in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), but longitudinal, real-world data using contemporary definitions of the BCG-exposed (BCG-E) phenotype remain limited, which constrains trial design. We assessed long-term clinical outcomes and clinical trajectories for a large BCG-exposed cohort treated at a single tertiary care center to establish pragmatic benchmarks to inform patient counseling, surveillance strategies, and the design and interpretation of bladder-sparing studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study for adults with histologically confirmed high-grade NMIBC treated with intravesical BCG at Moffitt Cancer Center between 1988 and 2024. Relevant clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records into a prespecified database, including detailed BCG doses and timing and features of each recurrence episode. Initial management followed contemporary standards, with subsequent intravesical therapy or radical cystectomy (RC) after shared decision-making. Patients were classified as BCG-unresponsive (BCG-UR) or BCG-E, with BCG adequacy defined as previously published. Time-to-event endpoints were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models; baseline characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Of 1076 NMIBC patients treated with BCG, 470 were classifiable: 245 (52.1%) were BCG-E, of whom 173 (70.6%) were resistant and 72 (29.4%) experienced delayed relapse, and 225 (47.9%) were BCG-UR. In the BCG-E group, 50.2% experienced recurrence and 15.5% experienced progression; median recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 27.2 mo. The 5-yr survival rate estimates were 32.25% for RFS, 79.3% for progression-free survival (PFS), 84.5% for metastasis-free survival (MFS), and 65.0% for overall survival (OS). Recurrence was associated with worse PFS (p < 0.001) and MFS (p = 0.03), but not OS (p = 0.2). RC was performed in 45 patients (18.4%). No consistent survival differences were observed across salvage therapies (62.0% BCG, 18.4% gemcitabine + docetaxel, 5.3% single-agent chemotherapy, 1.2% trials, 13% surveillance),. Multivariable OS estimates were computed. Addition of recurrence to the model did not improve discrimination; age and performance status were the strongest predictors of OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>We present comprehensive outcomes for and an in-depth characterization of clinical trajectories in BCG-E NMIBC, for which salvage intravesical BCG is predominant and oncologic results are durable. These data provide pragmatic benchmarks for the interpretation and design of bladder-sparing trials in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145800111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}