{"title":"The Effects of Abnormal Exposure on Individual Dose Monitoring with TLD Dosimeters.","authors":"Yanling Yi, Michael G Stabin","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Objectives: To analyze the effects of normal x-ray inspection, machine washing, and machine drying on thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) measurements during external individual monitoring and to provide suggestions for determining individual monitoring measurements under the mentioned abnormal situations. In this study, we focused on three abnormal situations: x-ray inspection, machine washing, and machine drying, which are common in external individual dose monitoring. We measured and compared the doses from TLD with and without 11, 23, 35, and 50 security checks. We used different radiation sources to expose the TLDs before or after machine washing with or without hot drying. The three radiation sources are natural background radiation, 137 Cs γ rays, and 320 kVp x-rays. We measured 20 TLDs for each situation. The average doses for the TLDs with 11, 23, 35, 50 security checks are 27.7 μGy, 59.7 μGy, 84.1 μGy, and 121.0 μGy, respectively. We measured an average dose of 2.5 μGy per exposure. The doses showed no significant difference between different times of washing with different radiation sources, natural background radiation, 137 Cs, or x-ray exposures. There was also no significant difference between the dose coming from the controlled group, drying at 60 °C and 90 °C for 1 h after exposure to 137 Cs γ rays and 320 kVp x-rays. The common machine drying under the temperature of 90 °C did not affect TLD measured doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":"730-733"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001874","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: Objectives: To analyze the effects of normal x-ray inspection, machine washing, and machine drying on thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) measurements during external individual monitoring and to provide suggestions for determining individual monitoring measurements under the mentioned abnormal situations. In this study, we focused on three abnormal situations: x-ray inspection, machine washing, and machine drying, which are common in external individual dose monitoring. We measured and compared the doses from TLD with and without 11, 23, 35, and 50 security checks. We used different radiation sources to expose the TLDs before or after machine washing with or without hot drying. The three radiation sources are natural background radiation, 137 Cs γ rays, and 320 kVp x-rays. We measured 20 TLDs for each situation. The average doses for the TLDs with 11, 23, 35, 50 security checks are 27.7 μGy, 59.7 μGy, 84.1 μGy, and 121.0 μGy, respectively. We measured an average dose of 2.5 μGy per exposure. The doses showed no significant difference between different times of washing with different radiation sources, natural background radiation, 137 Cs, or x-ray exposures. There was also no significant difference between the dose coming from the controlled group, drying at 60 °C and 90 °C for 1 h after exposure to 137 Cs γ rays and 320 kVp x-rays. The common machine drying under the temperature of 90 °C did not affect TLD measured doses.
期刊介绍:
Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.