Effect of Densah Burs on Primary and Secondary Stability of Immediately Loaded Implants in Addition to Crestal Bone Loss and Gingival Probing Depth - An Evaluative Study.

Q3 Dentistry Indian Journal of Dental Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-14 DOI:10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_908_23
Shraddha Rathi, N D Gupta, Sarwar Hashmi, S Abirami, Faiz Noor Khan Yusufi
{"title":"Effect of Densah Burs on Primary and Secondary Stability of Immediately Loaded Implants in Addition to Crestal Bone Loss and Gingival Probing Depth - An Evaluative Study.","authors":"Shraddha Rathi, N D Gupta, Sarwar Hashmi, S Abirami, Faiz Noor Khan Yusufi","doi":"10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_908_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osseodensification (OD) compaction increases primary stability by leaving the residual bone particles in the osteotomy site, which in turn act as an autograft. [ 1 ] Condensing the bone trabeculae through OD has demonstrated to have a potentiating influence on secondary stability. [ 2 ].</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A split-mouth study was conducted in 40 patients to determine the effect of OD on implant success rate in terms of primary and secondary stability in situations including immediate loading of implants placed in low-density bone, which was tested using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) at the interval of 0, 6 th month. In order to assess the implant success rate, gingival probing depth and crestal bone loss (CBL) around the implant were also assessed at baseline and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With respect to primary stability, at baseline, the mean RFA of Densah burs is 71.6 ± 9.5 and of conventional drills is 67.6 ± 10.4. The mean stability of Densah burs is significantly higher than conventional drills, both at baseline and after 6 months as well. CBL, at baseline, the mean CBL of Densah burs is 0.58 ± 0.11 and of conventional drills is 0.64 ± 0.12. The mean CBL of Densah burs is significantly lower than that of conventional drills for both.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implant stability values found in the present study were remarkable when compared between OD and conventional osteotomy techniques. Decreased loss of bone at the crest probing depth also aided in the increased success rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":13311,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dental Research","volume":" ","pages":"145-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_908_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Osseodensification (OD) compaction increases primary stability by leaving the residual bone particles in the osteotomy site, which in turn act as an autograft. [ 1 ] Condensing the bone trabeculae through OD has demonstrated to have a potentiating influence on secondary stability. [ 2 ].

Materials and methods: A split-mouth study was conducted in 40 patients to determine the effect of OD on implant success rate in terms of primary and secondary stability in situations including immediate loading of implants placed in low-density bone, which was tested using resonance frequency analysis (RFA) at the interval of 0, 6 th month. In order to assess the implant success rate, gingival probing depth and crestal bone loss (CBL) around the implant were also assessed at baseline and 6 months.

Results: With respect to primary stability, at baseline, the mean RFA of Densah burs is 71.6 ± 9.5 and of conventional drills is 67.6 ± 10.4. The mean stability of Densah burs is significantly higher than conventional drills, both at baseline and after 6 months as well. CBL, at baseline, the mean CBL of Densah burs is 0.58 ± 0.11 and of conventional drills is 0.64 ± 0.12. The mean CBL of Densah burs is significantly lower than that of conventional drills for both.

Conclusion: The implant stability values found in the present study were remarkable when compared between OD and conventional osteotomy techniques. Decreased loss of bone at the crest probing depth also aided in the increased success rate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Densah 车针对即刻加载种植体的初级和次级稳定性以及嵴骨损失和牙龈探查深度的影响--一项评估性研究。
简介骨质增生(OD)压实通过在截骨部位留下残余骨颗粒,进而起到自体移植的作用,从而增加一级稳定性[1]:对 40 例患者进行了分口研究,以确定 OD 对种植体成功率的影响,包括在低密度骨中植入种植体的即刻加载情况下的主要和次要稳定性,并在第 0 个月和第 6 个月之间使用共振频率分析(RFA)进行测试。为了评估种植体的成功率,还在基线和 6 个月时对种植体周围的牙龈探查深度和基底骨质流失(CBL)进行了评估:在基线稳定性方面,登沙车针的平均 RFA 为 71.6 ± 9.5,传统钻的平均 RFA 为 67.6 ± 10.4。无论是基线还是 6 个月后,Densah 车针的平均稳定性都明显高于传统车针。CBL 在基线时,电钻车针的平均 CBL 为 0.58 ± 0.11,而传统钻头的平均 CBL 为 0.64 ± 0.12。结论:本研究发现,OD和传统截骨技术的种植体稳定性值非常显著。嵴探查深度的骨丢失减少也有助于提高成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Indian Journal of Dental Research Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Dental Research (IJDR) is the official publication of the Indian Society for Dental Research (ISDR), India section of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR), published quarterly. IJDR publishes scientific papers on well designed and controlled original research involving orodental sciences. Papers may also include reports on unusual and interesting case presentations and invited review papers on significant topics.
期刊最新文献
Correction of Impacted Maxillary Permanent Anteriors - A Case Report. Probiotic Supplementation for Periodontal Diseases - An Umbrella Review. Relationship of Caries between Primary Molars and the Permanent First Molar. Rehabilitation of Nonsyndromic Oligodontia in Deciduous Dentition Using Modified Hollywood Bridge - A Case Report. Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite Concentration on the Outcome of Full Pulpotomy in Mature Permanent Teeth with Irreversible Pulpitis - A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1