The Effects of Torso-Borne Loads on Functional Movement Patterns.

Q1 Health Professions International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-07-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Kathryn S Bell, Jasmine D Brooks, Kara N Radzak, Sean W Mulvenon, Brian K Schilling
{"title":"The Effects of Torso-Borne Loads on Functional Movement Patterns.","authors":"Kathryn S Bell, Jasmine D Brooks, Kara N Radzak, Sean W Mulvenon, Brian K Schilling","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Functional movement patterns are an important aspect of everyday life, and a growing area of interest for determining the risk of injury and performance ability. Police, military, and fire personnel often carry torso-borne loads that increase the demands on the body while performing occupational tasks. The purpose of this study was to compare movement screen results in both a loaded and unloaded condition to identify potential effects that torso-borne body armor load carriage may have on tactical performance. This provided objective data on the effects that external loads may have on functional movement patterns. Twenty-four physically active participants (11 males, 13 females) volunteered and completed the Fusionetics™ Movement Efficiency Test (FMET) in two conditions: loaded (wearing a 13.5 kg tactical vest) and unloaded, in a counterbalanced order. Participants were video recorded performing these movements and scored later. The overall scores, on a scale of 0 to 100, showed a large, statistically significant decline in functional movement pattern quality from the unloaded to the loaded condition (12.6±7.3 points, p<.001, <i>d</i>=1.8). In the subscales, statistically significant declines (<i>p</i><.001) were seen in the 2-leg squat (<i>d</i>=0.8), push-ups (<i>d</i>=1.1), shoulder movements (<i>d</i>=2.1), and trunk movements (<i>d</i>=0.9). There was no significant effect of load on the cervical movements or 1-leg squat. Overall, torso-borne body armor loading decreased functional movement pattern quality, suggesting the potential benefit of performing loaded movement screens on tactical athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 7","pages":"975-984"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11382776/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Functional movement patterns are an important aspect of everyday life, and a growing area of interest for determining the risk of injury and performance ability. Police, military, and fire personnel often carry torso-borne loads that increase the demands on the body while performing occupational tasks. The purpose of this study was to compare movement screen results in both a loaded and unloaded condition to identify potential effects that torso-borne body armor load carriage may have on tactical performance. This provided objective data on the effects that external loads may have on functional movement patterns. Twenty-four physically active participants (11 males, 13 females) volunteered and completed the Fusionetics™ Movement Efficiency Test (FMET) in two conditions: loaded (wearing a 13.5 kg tactical vest) and unloaded, in a counterbalanced order. Participants were video recorded performing these movements and scored later. The overall scores, on a scale of 0 to 100, showed a large, statistically significant decline in functional movement pattern quality from the unloaded to the loaded condition (12.6±7.3 points, p<.001, d=1.8). In the subscales, statistically significant declines (p<.001) were seen in the 2-leg squat (d=0.8), push-ups (d=1.1), shoulder movements (d=2.1), and trunk movements (d=0.9). There was no significant effect of load on the cervical movements or 1-leg squat. Overall, torso-borne body armor loading decreased functional movement pattern quality, suggesting the potential benefit of performing loaded movement screens on tactical athletes.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
躯干承载负荷对功能性运动模式的影响。
功能性运动模式是日常生活的一个重要方面,也是确定受伤风险和工作能力的一个越来越受关注的领域。警察、军人和消防人员在执行职业任务时经常会承受躯干负荷,从而增加了对身体的要求。本研究的目的是比较负重和非负重状态下的运动筛查结果,以确定躯干携带防弹衣可能对战术表现产生的潜在影响。这为外部负荷可能对功能性运动模式产生的影响提供了客观数据。24 名身体活跃的参与者(11 名男性,13 名女性)自愿参加,并在两种条件下完成了 Fusionetics™ 运动效率测试(FMET):加载(穿戴 13.5 千克战术背心)和空载,顺序相同。对参赛者的动作进行录像,随后进行评分。总分(0 至 100 分)显示,从无负荷到有负荷条件下,功能性动作模式质量下降幅度较大,且具有统计学意义(12.6±7.3 分,pd=1.8)。在各分量表中,俯卧撑(d=1.1)、肩部运动(d=2.1)和躯干运动(d=0.9)的下降具有统计学意义(pd=0.8)。负荷对颈椎运动和单腿深蹲没有明显影响。总体而言,躯干承载式护甲负载降低了功能性运动模式的质量,这表明对战术运动员进行负载运动筛查具有潜在的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Exercise Dependence Among High-Intensity Functional Training Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. The Psychometric Performance of State Mindfulness Scales Around Sitting and Walking on Desert Trails: A Pilot Study. Yoga vs. Static Stretching: Recovery Impact on Male Athletes' Post-HIIT Heart Rate, Respiratory Rate, Blood Pressure, and Heart Rate Variability Analysis. Longitudinal Analysis of Subsequent Musculoskeletal Injuries and Predictive Value of Index Injuries in Collegiate Women's Field Hockey. Observing the Relationship Between Additional Measures of Handgrip Strength and the 6-Minute Push Test in Ambulatory Young Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1