Jie Xiang, Rajiv Ramasawmy, Felicia Seemann, Dana C Peters, Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn
{"title":"bSSFP Phase Contrast (PC-SSFP) at 0.55T Applied to Aortic Flow.","authors":"Jie Xiang, Rajiv Ramasawmy, Felicia Seemann, Dana C Peters, Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn","doi":"10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a growing interest in the development and application of mid-field (0.55T) for cardiac MR, including flow imaging. However, aortic flow imaging at 0.55T has limited SNR, especially in diastolic phases where there is reduced inflow-driven contrast for spoiled gradient echo (GRE) sequences. The low SNR can limit the accuracy of flow and regurgitant fraction measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this work, we developed a 2D phase contrast (PC) acquisition with balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP), termed PC-SSFP, for flow imaging and quantification at 0.55T. This PC-SSFP approach precisely nulls the 0<sup>th</sup> and 1<sup>st</sup> gradient moments at both the TE and TR, except for the flow-encoded acquisition, for which the 1<sup>st</sup> gradient moment at the TE is determined by the VENC. Our proposed sequence was tested in both phantoms and in healthy volunteers (n=11), to measure aortic flow. In volunteers, both a breath-hold and a free-breathing protocol, with averaging to increase SNR, were obtained. Total flow, peak flow, cardiac output and SNR were compared for PC-SSFP and PC-GRE. Stroke volumes were also measured and compared to planimetry method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a phantom, SNR was significantly higher using PC-SSFP compared to PC-GRE (25.5±9.6 vs 8.2±2.9), and the velocity measurements agreed well (R = 1.00). In healthy subjects, for both breath-hold (bh) and free-breathing (fb) protocols, PC-SSFP measured accurate peak flow (fb: R = 0.99, bh: R = 0.96) and cardiac output (fb: R = 0.98, bh: R = 0.88), compared to PC-GRE, accurate stroke volume (fb: R = 0.94, bh: R = 0.97), compared to planimetry measurement, and offered constant high SNR (fb: 28±9 vs 18±6, bh: 24±7 vs 11±3) over the cardiac cycle in 11 subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PC-SSFP is a more reliable evaluation tool for aortic flow quantification, when compared to the conventional PC-GRE method at 0.55T, providing higher SNR, and thus potentially more accurate flows.</p>","PeriodicalId":15221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101098","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There is a growing interest in the development and application of mid-field (0.55T) for cardiac MR, including flow imaging. However, aortic flow imaging at 0.55T has limited SNR, especially in diastolic phases where there is reduced inflow-driven contrast for spoiled gradient echo (GRE) sequences. The low SNR can limit the accuracy of flow and regurgitant fraction measurements.
Methods: In this work, we developed a 2D phase contrast (PC) acquisition with balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP), termed PC-SSFP, for flow imaging and quantification at 0.55T. This PC-SSFP approach precisely nulls the 0th and 1st gradient moments at both the TE and TR, except for the flow-encoded acquisition, for which the 1st gradient moment at the TE is determined by the VENC. Our proposed sequence was tested in both phantoms and in healthy volunteers (n=11), to measure aortic flow. In volunteers, both a breath-hold and a free-breathing protocol, with averaging to increase SNR, were obtained. Total flow, peak flow, cardiac output and SNR were compared for PC-SSFP and PC-GRE. Stroke volumes were also measured and compared to planimetry method.
Results: In a phantom, SNR was significantly higher using PC-SSFP compared to PC-GRE (25.5±9.6 vs 8.2±2.9), and the velocity measurements agreed well (R = 1.00). In healthy subjects, for both breath-hold (bh) and free-breathing (fb) protocols, PC-SSFP measured accurate peak flow (fb: R = 0.99, bh: R = 0.96) and cardiac output (fb: R = 0.98, bh: R = 0.88), compared to PC-GRE, accurate stroke volume (fb: R = 0.94, bh: R = 0.97), compared to planimetry measurement, and offered constant high SNR (fb: 28±9 vs 18±6, bh: 24±7 vs 11±3) over the cardiac cycle in 11 subjects.
Conclusion: PC-SSFP is a more reliable evaluation tool for aortic flow quantification, when compared to the conventional PC-GRE method at 0.55T, providing higher SNR, and thus potentially more accurate flows.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) publishes high-quality articles on all aspects of basic, translational and clinical research on the design, development, manufacture, and evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) methods applied to the cardiovascular system. Topical areas include, but are not limited to:
New applications of magnetic resonance to improve the diagnostic strategies, risk stratification, characterization and management of diseases affecting the cardiovascular system.
New methods to enhance or accelerate image acquisition and data analysis.
Results of multicenter, or larger single-center studies that provide insight into the utility of CMR.
Basic biological perceptions derived by CMR methods.