Comparison of incidence of hyponatremia between linezolid and vancomycin in neonates and infants.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jiac.2024.09.014
Yuichi Shibata, Jun Hirai, Nobuaki Mori, Nobuhiro Asai, Mao Hagihara, Yasumasa Yamada, Hiroshige Mikamo
{"title":"Comparison of incidence of hyponatremia between linezolid and vancomycin in neonates and infants.","authors":"Yuichi Shibata, Jun Hirai, Nobuaki Mori, Nobuhiro Asai, Mao Hagihara, Yasumasa Yamada, Hiroshige Mikamo","doi":"10.1016/j.jiac.2024.09.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A previous study reported that the incidence of hyponatremia after linezolid (LZD) use was higher than that with vancomycin (VCM) use in adults. However, hyponatremia due to LZD in neonates and infants was not investigated. This study aimed to compare the incidence of hyponatremia between LZD and VCM use in neonates and infants. The retrospective study was conducted at the Aichi Medical University Hospital. All patients who were cared for in NICU or GCU and received ≥3 days of LZD or VCM were included in this study. Hyponatremia was defined as serum sodium level ≤134 mEq/L and ≥5 % decrease from baseline after administration of LZD or VCM. A total of 76 patients (LZD, N = 36; VCM, N = 37) were included. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hyponatremia between the two groups (19.4 % vs 16.2 %, p = 0.72). The proportion of patients with a minimum value of serum sodium ≤134 mEq/L during treatment was 47.3 % in the LZD group and 35.1 % in the VCM group (p = 0.29), and the decrease in serum sodium level from baseline to the minimum value was 80.5 % and 78.4 %, respectively (p = 0.85). In conclusion, there was no significant difference in the incidence of hyponatremia between the LZD and VCM groups. Therefore, it is not necessary to avoid LZD use in neonates and infants because of the risk of hyponatremia.</p>","PeriodicalId":16103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiac.2024.09.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A previous study reported that the incidence of hyponatremia after linezolid (LZD) use was higher than that with vancomycin (VCM) use in adults. However, hyponatremia due to LZD in neonates and infants was not investigated. This study aimed to compare the incidence of hyponatremia between LZD and VCM use in neonates and infants. The retrospective study was conducted at the Aichi Medical University Hospital. All patients who were cared for in NICU or GCU and received ≥3 days of LZD or VCM were included in this study. Hyponatremia was defined as serum sodium level ≤134 mEq/L and ≥5 % decrease from baseline after administration of LZD or VCM. A total of 76 patients (LZD, N = 36; VCM, N = 37) were included. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hyponatremia between the two groups (19.4 % vs 16.2 %, p = 0.72). The proportion of patients with a minimum value of serum sodium ≤134 mEq/L during treatment was 47.3 % in the LZD group and 35.1 % in the VCM group (p = 0.29), and the decrease in serum sodium level from baseline to the minimum value was 80.5 % and 78.4 %, respectively (p = 0.85). In conclusion, there was no significant difference in the incidence of hyponatremia between the LZD and VCM groups. Therefore, it is not necessary to avoid LZD use in neonates and infants because of the risk of hyponatremia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较利奈唑胺和万古霉素在新生儿和婴儿中的低钠血症发生率。
之前有研究报告称,成人使用利奈唑胺(LZD)后发生低钠血症的几率高于使用万古霉素(VCM)。然而,对新生儿和婴儿因使用利奈唑胺而导致的低钠血症却未进行调查。本研究旨在比较新生儿和婴儿使用 LZD 和 VCM 时的低钠血症发生率。这项回顾性研究在爱知医科大学医院进行。所有在新生儿重症监护室(NICU)或普通重症监护室(GCU)接受护理并使用 LZD 或 VCM≥ 3 天的患者均被纳入本研究。低钠血症的定义是:服用 LZD 或 VCM 后,血清钠水平≤ 134 mEq/L,且比基线下降≥ 5%。共纳入 76 例患者(LZD,36 例;VCM,37 例)。两组低钠血症发生率无明显差异(19.4% vs 16.2%,P = 0.72)。治疗期间血清钠最低值≤134 mEq/L 的患者比例,LZD 组为 47.3%,VCM 组为 35.1%(p = 0.29),血清钠水平从基线到最低值的下降率分别为 80.5%和 78.4%(p = 0.85)。总之,LZD 组和 VCM 组的低钠血症发生率没有明显差异。因此,不必因为低钠血症的风险而避免在新生儿和婴儿中使用 LZD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy INFECTIOUS DISEASES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
303
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy (JIC) — official journal of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases — welcomes original papers, laboratory or clinical, as well as case reports, notes, committee reports, surveillance and guidelines from all parts of the world on all aspects of chemotherapy, covering the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and control of infection, including treatment with anticancer drugs. Experimental studies on animal models and pharmacokinetics, and reports on epidemiology and clinical trials are particularly welcome.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Legionella Diagnostic Prediction Score in patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron pneumonia. Encrusted pyelitis and hyperammonemia due to Corynebacterium urealyticum in a kidney transplant recipient. Teicoplanin 24-h loading dose regimen using a decision tree model to target serum trough concentration of 15-30 μg/mL: A retrospective study. Identification of causative and non-causative microorganisms of nephrostomy tube-associated pyelonephritis among patients with malignancy. Clinical characteristics and risk factors of infection in initially treated patients with multiple myeloma during the induction period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1