Eating Egg-Rich Diets and Modeling the Addition of One Daily Egg Reduced Risk of Nutrient Inadequacy among United States Adolescents with and without Food Insecurity

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.09.019
Analí Morales-Juárez , Alexandra E Cowan-Pyle , Regan L Bailey , Heather A Eicher-Miller
{"title":"Eating Egg-Rich Diets and Modeling the Addition of One Daily Egg Reduced Risk of Nutrient Inadequacy among United States Adolescents with and without Food Insecurity","authors":"Analí Morales-Juárez ,&nbsp;Alexandra E Cowan-Pyle ,&nbsp;Regan L Bailey ,&nbsp;Heather A Eicher-Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.09.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Adolescents have the poorest dietary intake throughout their lifespan. Food insecurity worsens these nutritional risks. Eggs are a nutrient-dense strategy to increase nutrient quality.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div><em>1</em>) compare usual nutrient intakes, Dietary Reference Intake and protein compliance with recommendations and scores of micronutrient quality; and <em>2</em>) analyze how adding 1 egg affects adolescents’ nutrient profiles, by food security status and egg-rich diets.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Dietary data of United States adolescents in the 2007–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed (14–17 y; <em>n</em> = 3633). Egg-rich diet levels were categorized as <em>1</em>) no eggs, <em>2</em>) eggs as ingredients in dishes, or <em>3</em>) primarily egg dishes. Food security status was classified using the United States Household Food Security Survey Module. The National Cancer Institute method was used to estimate usual nutrient intake and nutrient exposure scores [i.e., Food Nutrient Index (FNI) and Total Nutrient Index (TNI)]. Nutrient amounts from 1 medium egg were modeled on existing intakes. Pairwise t-tests determined significant differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over 60% of adolescents risked inadequate intake of calcium, choline, magnesium, vitamin D, and vitamin E regardless of food security status. Food-secure adolescents consuming primarily egg dishes had higher mean usual intakes of lutein + zeaxanthin (1544.1 <em>μ</em>g), choline (408.4 mg), vitamin B2 (2.3 mg), selenium (128.6 <em>μ</em>g), vitamin D (6 <em>μ</em>g), docosahexaenoic acid (70 mg), and protein (89.1 g) than other groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0002). Those who were food secure and consuming eggs as ingredients in dishes demonstrated higher nutrient adequacy for magnesium (scored ∼66 out of 100), potassium (scored 81), and total scores (scored 72 and 69, respectively) for the TNI and FNI; and folate only (scored 92) for the TNI, than those who were food insecure and not consuming eggs (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0002). Adding 1 egg increased choline and vitamin D usual intakes for some groups and nutrient index scores for all groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0005).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Adolescents are at substantial nutritional risk that was exacerbated by food insecurity and less egg consumption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":"154 11","pages":"Pages 3475-3484"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022316624010368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Adolescents have the poorest dietary intake throughout their lifespan. Food insecurity worsens these nutritional risks. Eggs are a nutrient-dense strategy to increase nutrient quality.

Objectives

1) compare usual nutrient intakes, Dietary Reference Intake and protein compliance with recommendations and scores of micronutrient quality; and 2) analyze how adding 1 egg affects adolescents’ nutrient profiles, by food security status and egg-rich diets.

Methods

Dietary data of United States adolescents in the 2007–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were analyzed (14–17 y; n = 3633). Egg-rich diet levels were categorized as 1) no eggs, 2) eggs as ingredients in dishes, or 3) primarily egg dishes. Food security status was classified using the United States Household Food Security Survey Module. The National Cancer Institute method was used to estimate usual nutrient intake and nutrient exposure scores [i.e., Food Nutrient Index (FNI) and Total Nutrient Index (TNI)]. Nutrient amounts from 1 medium egg were modeled on existing intakes. Pairwise t-tests determined significant differences.

Results

Over 60% of adolescents risked inadequate intake of calcium, choline, magnesium, vitamin D, and vitamin E regardless of food security status. Food-secure adolescents consuming primarily egg dishes had higher mean usual intakes of lutein + zeaxanthin (1544.1 μg), choline (408.4 mg), vitamin B2 (2.3 mg), selenium (128.6 μg), vitamin D (6 μg), docosahexaenoic acid (70 mg), and protein (89.1 g) than other groups (P < 0.0002). Those who were food secure and consuming eggs as ingredients in dishes demonstrated higher nutrient adequacy for magnesium (scored ∼66 out of 100), potassium (scored 81), and total scores (scored 72 and 69, respectively) for the TNI and FNI; and folate only (scored 92) for the TNI, than those who were food insecure and not consuming eggs (P < 0.0002). Adding 1 egg increased choline and vitamin D usual intakes for some groups and nutrient index scores for all groups (P < 0.0005).

Conclusions

Adolescents are at substantial nutritional risk that was exacerbated by food insecurity and less egg consumption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食用富含鸡蛋的膳食和建立每天添加一个鸡蛋的模型可降低美国青少年营养不足的风险,无论他们是否存在粮食不安全问题。
背景:在人的一生中,青少年的膳食摄入量最差。粮食不安全加剧了这些营养风险。目标:1)比较通常营养素摄入量、膳食营养素参考摄入量和蛋白质摄入量是否符合建议,以及微量营养素质量评分;2)根据食品安全状况和富含鸡蛋的膳食,分析增加一个鸡蛋对青少年营养概况的影响:方法:分析了 2007-2018 年 NHANES 中美国青少年的膳食数据(14-17 岁;n=3,633)。富含鸡蛋的饮食水平分为:1)非鸡蛋;2)作为菜肴配料的鸡蛋;或 3)以鸡蛋为主的菜肴。食品安全状况采用美国家庭食品安全调查模块进行分类。采用美国国家癌症研究所的方法估算通常的营养素摄入量和营养素暴露分数(即食物营养素指数和总营养素指数)。一个中等大小鸡蛋中的营养素含量以现有摄入量为模型。配对 t 检验确定显著差异:结果:无论食品安全状况如何,60%以上的青少年有可能摄入钙、胆碱、镁、维生素 D 和 E 不足。食品安全青少年主要食用蛋类菜肴,其叶黄素+玉米黄质(1544.1微克)、胆碱(408.4毫克)、维生素B2(2.3毫克)、硒(128.6微克)、维生素D(6微克)、二十二碳六烯酸(70毫克)和蛋白质(89.1克)的平均平时摄入量高于其他组别(结论:食品安全青少年的营养摄入量不足,可能会对他们的健康造成严重影响:青少年面临着巨大的营养风险,而粮食不安全和食用鸡蛋较少又加剧了这一风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition
Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
260
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.
期刊最新文献
Regular use of fish oil supplements, Life's Essential 8 score, and cardiovascular mortality in people with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study. Metabolic mechanisms underlying the association between the pro-fertility diet and in vitro fertilization endpoints. Roles of Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Postbiotics in B-cell mediated Immune Regulation. Lutein Emulsion Stabilized by a Food-Grade Biopolymer Enhanced Lutein Bioavailability and Improved Retinal Vessel Morphology in Neonatal Rats with Retinopathy of Prematurity. Predictors of stunting and pathway analysis for linear growth among children 2-3 years of age after a trial of small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements and home-installed growth charts in three districts in Zambia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1