{"title":"In vitro effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments.","authors":"Shaghayegh Golalipour, Ezatollah Jalalian, Sara Koosha, Sotude Khorshidi, Maryam Torshabi, Maryam Sayyari","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Titanium abutments are considered the criterion standard for dental implants, yet the gray color poses esthetic concerns. Anodization has been proposed to enhance esthetics, but its effects on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion are unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Sixteen titanium abutments were divided into test (anodized) and control (nonanodized) groups (n=8). Anodization used 63 V from seven 9 V batteries and an electrolyte of 250 mL distilled water with 1 g trisodium phosphate. Surface roughness was measured with a profilometer at 4 mN force and 0.5 mm/second, assessing 3 supragingival points per specimen. In addition, 1 specimen from each group was selected for field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Sterilized abutments were exposed to a Staphylococcus aureus suspension (10<sup>5</sup> CFUs/mL) and then placed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), sonicated, vortexed, diluted, and cultured on agar. Bacterial adhesion was assessed after incubating 144 microplates at 37 °C for 24 hours. Colony counts were calculated using a dilution factor and serial dilution, and log 10 of CFUs/mL plotted. Data analysis used the Student t test for bacterial adhesion and the Mann-Whitney U test for surface roughness (α=.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test and control groups showed no significant difference in surface roughness (P>.05). However, bacterial adhesion to anodized abutments was significantly lower than that to control abutments (P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anodization of titanium abutments significantly decreased bacterial adhesion and had no significant effect on surface roughness.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.08.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Statement of problem: Titanium abutments are considered the criterion standard for dental implants, yet the gray color poses esthetic concerns. Anodization has been proposed to enhance esthetics, but its effects on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion are unclear.
Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of anodization on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion to titanium abutments.
Material and methods: Sixteen titanium abutments were divided into test (anodized) and control (nonanodized) groups (n=8). Anodization used 63 V from seven 9 V batteries and an electrolyte of 250 mL distilled water with 1 g trisodium phosphate. Surface roughness was measured with a profilometer at 4 mN force and 0.5 mm/second, assessing 3 supragingival points per specimen. In addition, 1 specimen from each group was selected for field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). Sterilized abutments were exposed to a Staphylococcus aureus suspension (105 CFUs/mL) and then placed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), sonicated, vortexed, diluted, and cultured on agar. Bacterial adhesion was assessed after incubating 144 microplates at 37 °C for 24 hours. Colony counts were calculated using a dilution factor and serial dilution, and log 10 of CFUs/mL plotted. Data analysis used the Student t test for bacterial adhesion and the Mann-Whitney U test for surface roughness (α=.05).
Results: The test and control groups showed no significant difference in surface roughness (P>.05). However, bacterial adhesion to anodized abutments was significantly lower than that to control abutments (P<.001).
Conclusions: Anodization of titanium abutments significantly decreased bacterial adhesion and had no significant effect on surface roughness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.