[How Region Sörmland dealt with Covid-19 in 2020-2021].

Lakartidningen Pub Date : 2024-09-17
Markus Castegren
{"title":"[How Region Sörmland dealt with Covid-19 in 2020-2021].","authors":"Markus Castegren","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Region Sörmland, the burden of critical illness during the first wave of Covid-19 in april 2020 lead to a 25-fold increase in the number of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. The decision was made that quantity should be prioritised before individual quality. This led to a highly standardised care during the intensive care period. All patients admitted to any of the county's three hospitals were assessed as regarded their ability to survive invasive mechanical ventilation. The assessment was based on the Charlson Age-adjusted Comorbidity Index and the Clinical Frailty Scale. Of all >2000 admitted patients with Covid-19, 37% were assessed as not to benifit from mechanical ventilation. The outcome of intensive care patients was very good in Region Sörmland compared to the rest of Sweden, with a 30-day mortality rate of 14% following intensive care. The outcome after Covid-19-associated intensive care in Sweden differed highly between ICUs, with a span of 7-58% 30-day mortality rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":17988,"journal":{"name":"Lakartidningen","volume":"121 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lakartidningen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Region Sörmland, the burden of critical illness during the first wave of Covid-19 in april 2020 lead to a 25-fold increase in the number of patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. The decision was made that quantity should be prioritised before individual quality. This led to a highly standardised care during the intensive care period. All patients admitted to any of the county's three hospitals were assessed as regarded their ability to survive invasive mechanical ventilation. The assessment was based on the Charlson Age-adjusted Comorbidity Index and the Clinical Frailty Scale. Of all >2000 admitted patients with Covid-19, 37% were assessed as not to benifit from mechanical ventilation. The outcome of intensive care patients was very good in Region Sörmland compared to the rest of Sweden, with a 30-day mortality rate of 14% following intensive care. The outcome after Covid-19-associated intensive care in Sweden differed highly between ICUs, with a span of 7-58% 30-day mortality rate.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[2020-2021 年萨尔姆兰地区如何应对 Covid-19]。
在 Sörmland 地区,2020 年 4 月第一波 Covid-19 期间的危重病负担导致需要有创机械通气的病人数量增加了 25 倍。在此情况下,我们做出了 "数量优先于质量 "的决定。这导致重症监护期间的护理高度标准化。该县三家医院中的任何一家医院都会对所有入院患者进行评估,看他们是否有能力在有创机械通气下存活。评估的依据是夏尔森年龄调整综合症指数(Charlson Age-adjusted Comorbidity Index)和临床虚弱量表(Clinical Frailty Scale)。在所有超过 2000 名患有 Covid-19 的入院患者中,有 37% 被评估为无法从机械通气中获益。与瑞典其他地区相比,索姆兰地区重症监护患者的治疗效果非常好,重症监护后 30 天的死亡率为 14%。瑞典各重症监护室在使用 Covid-19 相关重症监护后的效果差异很大,30 天死亡率从 7% 到 58% 不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lakartidningen
Lakartidningen Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
期刊最新文献
[Updated guidelines for anaphylaxis management - simplified structures for enhanced patient safety]. [QregPV - a regional quality register of patients in primary care with hypertension or coronary artery disease]. [Co-occurring diagnoses of autism spectrum disorder and borderline personality disorder]. [Treatment of heart failure in Sweden: progress but not there yet]. Postmenopausal osteoporos kan och bör förebyggas tidigt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1