Age differences in memory for names and occupations associated with faces: the effects of assigned and self-perceived social importance.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Memory Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1080/09658211.2024.2399110
Lixia Yang, Julia Scaringi, Lingqian Li
{"title":"Age differences in memory for names and occupations associated with faces: the effects of assigned and self-perceived social importance.","authors":"Lixia Yang, Julia Scaringi, Lingqian Li","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2024.2399110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been documented that older adults' memory deficits can be reduced for information depicted as personally and socially important (e.g., Hargis & Castel, 2017 [Younger and older adults' associative memory for social information: The role of information importance. <i>Psychology and Aging</i>, <i>32</i>(4), 325-330]). The current study aimed to further assess the effects of both arbitrarily assigned and self-perceived importance in younger and older adults' memory for names (low in schematic support) and occupations (high in schematic support) associated with faces. Participants studied the same 16 face-name-occupation triplets (with neutral facial expressions) across four blocks, each including a free recall of names and occupations. At the end, they completed a cued recall of names and occupations. The faces were arbitrarily cued as socially important (i.e., with an orange frame) or unimportant (e.g., without a frame). The perceived social importance was assessed by rating all the triplets based on a 10-point Likert Scale (1 = least and 10 = most important) at the end. The results showed that age-related memory deficits were reduced or even eliminated for occupations (high in schematic support) relative to names (low in schematic support), especially in the free recall of faces self-perceived as important. In other words, the combination of schematic support and self-perceived importance can effectively mitigate older adults' memory deficit.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2024.2399110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has been documented that older adults' memory deficits can be reduced for information depicted as personally and socially important (e.g., Hargis & Castel, 2017 [Younger and older adults' associative memory for social information: The role of information importance. Psychology and Aging, 32(4), 325-330]). The current study aimed to further assess the effects of both arbitrarily assigned and self-perceived importance in younger and older adults' memory for names (low in schematic support) and occupations (high in schematic support) associated with faces. Participants studied the same 16 face-name-occupation triplets (with neutral facial expressions) across four blocks, each including a free recall of names and occupations. At the end, they completed a cued recall of names and occupations. The faces were arbitrarily cued as socially important (i.e., with an orange frame) or unimportant (e.g., without a frame). The perceived social importance was assessed by rating all the triplets based on a 10-point Likert Scale (1 = least and 10 = most important) at the end. The results showed that age-related memory deficits were reduced or even eliminated for occupations (high in schematic support) relative to names (low in schematic support), especially in the free recall of faces self-perceived as important. In other words, the combination of schematic support and self-perceived importance can effectively mitigate older adults' memory deficit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与人脸相关的姓名和职业记忆的年龄差异:指定和自我感觉的社会重要性的影响。
有资料表明,对于被描述为对个人和社会重要的信息,老年人的记忆缺陷会减少(例如,Hargis & Castel, 2017 [年轻人和老年人对社会信息的联想记忆:信息重要性的作用。Psychology and Aging, 32(4), 325-330])。本研究旨在进一步评估任意指定的重要性和自我感知的重要性对年轻人和老年人记忆与人脸相关的姓名(图式支持度低)和职业(图式支持度高)的影响。受试者在四个区块中学习了相同的 16 个面孔-姓名-职业三联体(带有中性面部表情),每个区块包括姓名和职业的自由回忆。最后,他们完成了对姓名和职业的提示回忆。这些面孔被任意提示为社会重要面孔(即带有橙色边框)或社会不重要面孔(如没有边框)。最后根据 10 分制李克特量表(1 = 最不重要,10 = 最重要)对所有三胞胎的社会重要性进行评分。结果表明,与年龄有关的记忆缺陷在职业(图式支持度高)方面比在姓名(图式支持度低)方面有所减少甚至消除,尤其是在自由回忆自我认为重要的面孔时。换句话说,图式支持和自我认为的重要性相结合,可以有效缓解老年人的记忆缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Memory
Memory PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
79
期刊介绍: Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.
期刊最新文献
Flashbulb and first-hand memories for campus closings due to COVID-19: consistency and change. Effectiveness of production and drawing as encoding techniques on recall using mixed- and pure-list designs. Inducing positive involuntary mental imagery in daily life using personalized photograph stimuli. Negative life events predict depressive trends: the moderating effect of overgeneral autobiographical memory and early parenting behaviour. You don't understand me! But, I do! Awareness of cross-generational differences in collective remembering of national historic events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1