The Effectiveness of Nonsurgical Interventions for Weight Loss Maintenance in Adults: An Updated, GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition reviews Pub Date : 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1093/nutrit/nuae128
Seyed Mojtaba Ghoreishy, Morvarid Noormohammadi, Sheida Zeraattalab-Motlagh, Nargeskhatoon Shoaibinobarian, Minoo Hasan Rashedi, Samira Movahed, Amirhossein Hemmati, Amirhossein Nazarian, Maria Luz Fernandez, Farzad Shidfar
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Nonsurgical Interventions for Weight Loss Maintenance in Adults: An Updated, GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Seyed Mojtaba Ghoreishy, Morvarid Noormohammadi, Sheida Zeraattalab-Motlagh, Nargeskhatoon Shoaibinobarian, Minoo Hasan Rashedi, Samira Movahed, Amirhossein Hemmati, Amirhossein Nazarian, Maria Luz Fernandez, Farzad Shidfar","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuae128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Today, there are many discussions about the best way to maintain weight and prevent weight regain after a period of weight loss.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to summarize, based on data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs), the impact of nonsurgical interventions for adults' weight loss maintenance.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science databases were reviewed during June 2023.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Meta-analyses assessing the impacts of nonsurgical interventions for weight loss maintenance were conducted. Effect sizes of nutritional interventions were recalculated by applying a random-effects model. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework was implemented to determine evidence certainty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meta-analysis of data from a total of 56 RCTs (n = 13 270 participants) represented a significant weight reduction after behavior and lifestyle interventions (mean difference [MD], -0.64 kg [95% CI, -1.18 to -0.09]; I2 = 89.5%; P < .001 for heterogeneity). Pharmacological interventions had also a significant effect on weight change during the weight maintenance phase (MD, -2.57 kg [95% CI, -3.12 to -2.02]; I2 = 91.6%; P < .001 for heterogeneity). The weight loss reduction from pharmacological interventions was greater with sibutramine (MD, -2.57; 95% CI: -3.12 to -2.02). Additionally, diet intervention and dietary and physical activity strategies were associated with a negligible trending decrease in weigh regain (respectively: MD, -0.91 kg [95% CI, -2.18 to 0.36], I2 = 55.7%, P = .016 for heterogeneity; and MD, -0.3 kg [95% CI, -4.13 to 3.52], I2 =  94.1%, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this review indicate there is a favorable impact of behavior-based interventions and antiobesity medications on weight maintenance.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no CRD42023468056.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuae128","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Today, there are many discussions about the best way to maintain weight and prevent weight regain after a period of weight loss.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to summarize, based on data from randomized clinical trials (RCTs), the impact of nonsurgical interventions for adults' weight loss maintenance.

Data sources: The Medline (PubMed), Scopus, and Web of Science databases were reviewed during June 2023.

Data extraction: Meta-analyses assessing the impacts of nonsurgical interventions for weight loss maintenance were conducted. Effect sizes of nutritional interventions were recalculated by applying a random-effects model. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework was implemented to determine evidence certainty.

Results: Meta-analysis of data from a total of 56 RCTs (n = 13 270 participants) represented a significant weight reduction after behavior and lifestyle interventions (mean difference [MD], -0.64 kg [95% CI, -1.18 to -0.09]; I2 = 89.5%; P < .001 for heterogeneity). Pharmacological interventions had also a significant effect on weight change during the weight maintenance phase (MD, -2.57 kg [95% CI, -3.12 to -2.02]; I2 = 91.6%; P < .001 for heterogeneity). The weight loss reduction from pharmacological interventions was greater with sibutramine (MD, -2.57; 95% CI: -3.12 to -2.02). Additionally, diet intervention and dietary and physical activity strategies were associated with a negligible trending decrease in weigh regain (respectively: MD, -0.91 kg [95% CI, -2.18 to 0.36], I2 = 55.7%, P = .016 for heterogeneity; and MD, -0.3 kg [95% CI, -4.13 to 3.52], I2 =  94.1%, P < .001).

Conclusion: The findings of this review indicate there is a favorable impact of behavior-based interventions and antiobesity medications on weight maintenance.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration no CRD42023468056.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非手术干预对维持成人体重的有效性:经过 GRADE 评估的最新随机临床试验系统综述和元分析。
背景:如今,关于维持体重和防止减肥后体重反弹的最佳方法有很多讨论:本研究的目的是根据随机临床试验(RCTs)的数据,总结非手术干预对成人减肥维持的影响:数据提取:在 2023 年 6 月期间对 Medline(PubMed)、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库进行了审查:数据提取:对非手术干预对维持体重的影响进行了荟萃分析。采用随机效应模型重新计算了营养干预的效应大小。采用 "建议、评估、发展和评价分级 "框架来确定证据的确定性:对总共 56 项 RCT(n = 13 270 名参与者)的数据进行了 Meta 分析,结果表明,经过行为和生活方式干预后,体重明显减轻(平均差 [MD],-0.64 千克 [95% CI,-1.18 至 -0.09];I2 = 89.5%;P 结论:本综述的结果表明,在采取营养干预措施后,体重明显减轻:系统综述注册:PROSPERO注册号:CRD42023468056。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of the Beneficial Effects of Berry Extracts on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Animal Models. Health Benefits From Diets High in Salicylates May Arise From Improved Utilization of Dietary Copper. The Longitudinal Evidence on Social Ties and Fruit and Vegetable Intake among Aging Adults: A Systematic Review. The psychological basis of hunger and its dysfunctions. Correction to: Menatetrenone (Vitamin K2) and Bone Quality in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1