Clinical Significance of Biliary Invasion at Diagnosis in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B-C Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis in South Korea.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1159/000541545
Chai Hong Rim, Won Sup Yoon, Sunmin Park
{"title":"Clinical Significance of Biliary Invasion at Diagnosis in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage B-C Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis in South Korea.","authors":"Chai Hong Rim, Won Sup Yoon, Sunmin Park","doi":"10.1159/000541545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Evidence of biliary invasion as a prognostic factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear. We aimed to verify the significance of clinically diagnosed biliary involvement in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B-C (BCLC B-C) HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Korean Liver Cancer Study Group randomly extracted data of patients with HCC enrolled in the Korean Central Cancer Registry between 2011 and 2016 from approximately 50 hospitals nationwide. After excluding records without information regarding serum bilirubin level, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, and Child-Pugh class, a pre-propensity score matching cohort comprising 4,077 patients was included. Considering age, sex, body mass index, viral cause, serum bilirubin level, AFP, Child-Pugh class, tumor size, multiplicity, portal invasion, and extrahepatic metastasis, patients with and without bile duct invasion at initial imaging diagnosis were matched at a ratio of 1:2 from the pre-propensity score matching cohort to form a matched cohort (propensity score matching cohort).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pre-propensity score matching cohort included 4,077 patients with BCLC B-C and 165 (4.0%) with biliary invasion at diagnosis. Regarding biliary invasion at diagnosis, 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 41.2% and 29.1% (with invasion) and 54% and 40.9% (without invasion), respectively (p &lt; 0.0001). Corresponding cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates at 1 and 2 years were 43.4% and 30.7% (with invasion) and 56.6% and 44% (without invasion), respectively (p &lt; 0.0001). Although biliary invasion was a significant factor affecting overall and CSS rates in a univariate analysis, it was not statistically significant in multivariate analyses for overall (p = 0.153) and cancer-specific (p = 0.198) survival rates. The propensity score matching cohort included 165 patients with biliary invasion at diagnosis and 330 without biliary invasion. In the propensity score matching cohort, biliary invasion at diagnosis was not a significant factor affecting overall (p = 0.603) or cancer-specific (p = 0.960) survival rates in the univariate analyses. One- and 2-year OS were 41.2% and 29.1% (with invasion) and 36.1% and 28.2% (without invasion), respectively. The corresponding CSS at one and 2 years were 43.4% and 30.7% (with invasion) and 39.8% and 31.4% (without invasion), respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that AFP levels, Child-Pugh class, tumor singularity, tumor size, portal invasion, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases significantly affected both overall and CSS rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biliary invasion at diagnosis in patients with BCLC B-C does not affect overall or CSS rates; however, other prognostic factors associated with biliary invasion could have a greater impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541545","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Evidence of biliary invasion as a prognostic factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear. We aimed to verify the significance of clinically diagnosed biliary involvement in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B-C (BCLC B-C) HCC.

Methods: The Korean Liver Cancer Study Group randomly extracted data of patients with HCC enrolled in the Korean Central Cancer Registry between 2011 and 2016 from approximately 50 hospitals nationwide. After excluding records without information regarding serum bilirubin level, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, and Child-Pugh class, a pre-propensity score matching cohort comprising 4,077 patients was included. Considering age, sex, body mass index, viral cause, serum bilirubin level, AFP, Child-Pugh class, tumor size, multiplicity, portal invasion, and extrahepatic metastasis, patients with and without bile duct invasion at initial imaging diagnosis were matched at a ratio of 1:2 from the pre-propensity score matching cohort to form a matched cohort (propensity score matching cohort).

Results: The pre-propensity score matching cohort included 4,077 patients with BCLC B-C and 165 (4.0%) with biliary invasion at diagnosis. Regarding biliary invasion at diagnosis, 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 41.2% and 29.1% (with invasion) and 54% and 40.9% (without invasion), respectively (p < 0.0001). Corresponding cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates at 1 and 2 years were 43.4% and 30.7% (with invasion) and 56.6% and 44% (without invasion), respectively (p < 0.0001). Although biliary invasion was a significant factor affecting overall and CSS rates in a univariate analysis, it was not statistically significant in multivariate analyses for overall (p = 0.153) and cancer-specific (p = 0.198) survival rates. The propensity score matching cohort included 165 patients with biliary invasion at diagnosis and 330 without biliary invasion. In the propensity score matching cohort, biliary invasion at diagnosis was not a significant factor affecting overall (p = 0.603) or cancer-specific (p = 0.960) survival rates in the univariate analyses. One- and 2-year OS were 41.2% and 29.1% (with invasion) and 36.1% and 28.2% (without invasion), respectively. The corresponding CSS at one and 2 years were 43.4% and 30.7% (with invasion) and 39.8% and 31.4% (without invasion), respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that AFP levels, Child-Pugh class, tumor singularity, tumor size, portal invasion, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases significantly affected both overall and CSS rates.

Conclusion: Biliary invasion at diagnosis in patients with BCLC B-C does not affect overall or CSS rates; however, other prognostic factors associated with biliary invasion could have a greater impact.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴塞罗那诊所肝癌 B-C 期肝细胞癌诊断时胆道受侵的临床意义:韩国全国队列分析。
导言:胆道侵犯作为肝细胞癌患者预后因素的证据尚不明确。我们旨在验证临床诊断出的胆道受累对巴塞罗那肝癌诊所 B-C 期(BCLC B-C)肝细胞癌患者的意义。方法 韩国肝癌研究小组从全国约 50 家医院随机抽取了 2011-2016 年间韩国中央癌症登记处登记的肝细胞癌患者数据。在排除没有血清胆红素水平、甲胎蛋白水平和 Child-Pugh 分级信息的记录后,纳入了由 4077 名患者组成的预倾向评分匹配队列。考虑到年龄、性别、体重指数、病毒病因、血清胆红素水平、甲胎蛋白水平、Child-Pugh 分级、肿瘤大小、多发性、门静脉侵犯和肝外转移等因素,将初次影像诊断时有胆管侵犯和无胆管侵犯的患者按 1:2 的比例从倾向得分匹配前队列中匹配出来,形成匹配队列(倾向得分匹配队列)。结果 倾向得分匹配前队列包括 4077 例 BCLC B-C 患者,其中 165 例(4.0%)在诊断时有胆道侵犯。就诊断时的胆道侵犯而言,一年和两年总生存率分别为 41.2% 和 29.1%(有侵犯)和 54% 和 40.9%(无侵犯)(p<0.0001)。一年和两年的癌症特异性生存率分别为 43.4% 和 30.7%(有侵犯)以及 56.6% 和 44%(无侵犯)(p<0.0001)。虽然在单变量分析中,胆道侵犯是影响总生存率和癌症特异性生存率的重要因素,但在总生存率(p=0.153)和癌症特异性生存率(p=0.198)的多变量分析中,胆道侵犯并无统计学意义。倾向评分匹配队列包括 165 名诊断时有胆道侵犯的患者和 330 名无胆道侵犯的患者。在倾向得分匹配队列中,单变量分析显示,诊断时胆道受侵并不是影响总生存率(p=0.603)或癌症特异性生存率(p=0.960)的重要因素。一年和两年的总生存率分别为41.2%和29.1%(有侵犯)和36.1%和28.2%(无侵犯)。一年和两年的癌症特异性生存率分别为43.4%和30.7%(有侵犯)和39.8%和31.4%(无侵犯)。多变量分析显示,甲胎蛋白水平、Child-Pugh分级、肿瘤单发性、肿瘤大小、门脉侵犯、淋巴结转移和远处转移对总生存率和癌症特异性生存率有显著影响。结论 BCLC B-C 患者诊断时的胆道侵犯不会影响总生存率或癌症特异性生存率;但是,与胆道侵犯相关的其他预后因素可能会产生更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology
Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.
期刊最新文献
Clinicopathological Characteristics and Perioperative Treatment of Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study. Prognostic Evaluation of Conversion Therapy Following Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy or Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced or Transarterial Chemoembolization Unsuitable Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma-A retrospective cohort study. Prognostic Nutrition Index as a Biomarker for Treatment Sensitivity to Chemotherapy and Nivolumab as the First-Line Treatment in Patients with Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study. Development of an Artificial Intelligence System for Distinguishing Malignant from Benign Soft Tissue Tumors Using Contrast-Enhanced MR Images. Effects of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab on Skeletal Muscle Volume and Cardiac Function in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1