Shehab Fareed, Dina Sameh Soliman, Abdulrahman F Al-Mashdali, Amna Gameil, Yahya Mulikandathil, Awni Alshurafa, ElMustafa Abdalla, Abdallah Fadul, Sarah Aldali, Deena Mudawi, Kaplana Singh, Feryal Ibrahim, Anas Hamad, Honar Cherif, Mohamed Yassin
{"title":"Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Core Binding Factor Rearrangements: A 10-Year Cancer Center Experience.","authors":"Shehab Fareed, Dina Sameh Soliman, Abdulrahman F Al-Mashdali, Amna Gameil, Yahya Mulikandathil, Awni Alshurafa, ElMustafa Abdalla, Abdallah Fadul, Sarah Aldali, Deena Mudawi, Kaplana Singh, Feryal Ibrahim, Anas Hamad, Honar Cherif, Mohamed Yassin","doi":"10.1159/000544049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is characterized by t(8;21) or inv(16)/t(16;16) chromosomal rearrangements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study of 71 CBF-AML cases from Qatar's National Center for Cancer Care & Research (2013-2022), we analyzed clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort was predominantly male (76%) with a median age of 40 years, and 96% were de novo AML. The t(8;21) translocation was more frequent (69%) than inv(16)/t(16;16). Patients under 40 years showed higher white blood cell counts and blast percentages. Standard \"3+7\" induction chemotherapy (used in 69% of cases) achieved remission in 67% of patients. Median overall survival was 81% at 37 months, with median progression-free survival of 34 months. No significant survival differences were observed based on FLT3-ITD status, translocation type, complex karyotype, KIT mutation status, or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (performed in 19% of patients), though patients under 60 years demonstrated better survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights CBF-AML heterogeneity and challenges established prognostic markers, suggesting a need for risk stratification reassessment, treatment strategy optimization, ELN guidelines implementation, and continuous molecular monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is characterized by t(8;21) or inv(16)/t(16;16) chromosomal rearrangements.
Methods: In this retrospective study of 71 CBF-AML cases from Qatar's National Center for Cancer Care & Research (2013-2022), we analyzed clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes.
Results: The cohort was predominantly male (76%) with a median age of 40 years, and 96% were de novo AML. The t(8;21) translocation was more frequent (69%) than inv(16)/t(16;16). Patients under 40 years showed higher white blood cell counts and blast percentages. Standard "3+7" induction chemotherapy (used in 69% of cases) achieved remission in 67% of patients. Median overall survival was 81% at 37 months, with median progression-free survival of 34 months. No significant survival differences were observed based on FLT3-ITD status, translocation type, complex karyotype, KIT mutation status, or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (performed in 19% of patients), though patients under 60 years demonstrated better survival outcomes.
Conclusions: This study highlights CBF-AML heterogeneity and challenges established prognostic markers, suggesting a need for risk stratification reassessment, treatment strategy optimization, ELN guidelines implementation, and continuous molecular monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.